Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 4/18/2010 11:28:35 PM EDT
Sucked... I bought it and watched it because I loved the first one.  The movie was ok, but wasn't that great.  The first one is a classic with replay value.. This one not so much.  And instead of going after the italian mafia again, they should have hunted down and killed Sean Patrick Flanery's plastic surgeon.  Wtf did he do to himself.  I know the first one was made over 10 years ago, so you can expect some aging, but this was definately not the case.  It looked like he went to a doctor and said he wanted to be a crossbreed between Edward Norton and Agent Moulder from the x-files.  I thought this was corny that they would try to cast a look-a-like to replace him, and was shocked to find out it was actually him.

1999


2009


What do you think?  10 years of aging or plastic surgery gone wrong?
Link Posted: 4/18/2010 11:34:59 PM EDT
[#1]
10 years.   And I liked the sequel
Link Posted: 4/18/2010 11:45:13 PM EDT
[#2]
Didn't like the second as much as the original, but it was definitely pretty funny
Link Posted: 4/18/2010 11:46:53 PM EDT
[#3]



Quoted:


10 years.   And I liked the sequel


I liked it, and it could have been much, much worse.

 
Link Posted: 4/18/2010 11:48:55 PM EDT
[#4]
It needs to find it's way into the same place that ET video game went too
Link Posted: 4/18/2010 11:49:56 PM EDT
[#5]
when will #3 come out?





Link Posted: 4/18/2010 11:54:54 PM EDT
[#6]
Quoted:
when will #3 come out?







I don't know, but when #3 comes out, he will probably look like Eddie Murphy or Michael Jackson.  Actually I think it's too much botox. Probably took a lot of effort for him to make facial expressions.

Link Posted: 4/19/2010 12:37:16 AM EDT
[#7]
I'm majorly disappointed that Ron Jeremy didn't make a return


Boondock saints 3: Ron Jermey's Catholic school girl adventures.
Link Posted: 4/19/2010 2:22:08 AM EDT
[#8]
#2 tried too hard.
Link Posted: 4/19/2010 2:31:13 AM EDT
[#9]



Quoted:


#2 tried too hard.






 
Link Posted: 4/19/2010 2:38:23 AM EDT
[#10]
Personally, I enjoyed both. Now, I agree #2 wasn't as good as #1, but think about it: In how many other movie series is the second one even half as good as the first? Very few! So at least this pair made it farther than the vast majority or sequels.
Link Posted: 4/19/2010 2:53:36 AM EDT
[#11]
#2 was an exercise in suckery gone very, very bad.  Ten kinds of dead-cat-fuck awful.  
Link Posted: 4/19/2010 3:12:14 AM EDT
[#12]
I want to watch it soon.
Link Posted: 4/19/2010 3:20:43 AM EDT
[#13]
I thought it was really good. You have to remember the first one was pretty damn campy too. Accept it, enjoy the movie.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
Link Posted: 4/19/2010 3:28:08 AM EDT
[#14]
I thought it was pretty good. It wasn't the greatest movie ever but it was entertaining. Plus the FBI chick was sexy as hell...
Link Posted: 4/19/2010 3:43:59 AM EDT
[#15]
LOVE the first one, I had low expectations for the second one and thought it totally sucked. I'm pretty easy to please as far as movies go and this one sucked.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top