SO I was just thinking, let's say shit has hit the fan, only not everyone is dead (let's say just half the nation or something), and things are really bad, BUT law enforcement and the "system" does not fall apart. Let's also say in this situation there's displaced people across the board. Reason doesn't matter, fallout, invasion, for some reason there's a lot of good people like you and me that no longer have a home, and can't even return to the area you're from.
Ignoring the simple fact that uh "some" of us are out of weight and just couldn't practically ruck it cross country, what would the legalities of travelling armed with some semblance of law, perhaps martial law in some areas be? What would likely happen to an individual or small group (3-5) hiking cross country fully armed, rifle, pistol, backpack, etc.
tl;dr: Would our arsenals be of any use in a post-apocalyptic world where the police turn militant on the populace to maintain control in a SHTF situation? Realistically, would we be quickly disarmed or disarmed eventually? To compare this idea, what would the legality of a homeless man be walking cross country with a loaded rifle and pistol?
Just some random ideas for conversation.