Try this: If you assault someone with a weapon, it's an assault weapon. That applies even to fists.
A weapon's appearance doesn't change its value as a weapon.
Shot for shot, a Winchester Model 70, bolt action, blued steel, walnut stock, having no "evil features" associated with assault rifles, equipped with internal 5 round magazine, no bayonet lug, no flash hider, no grenade launcher,no pistol grip, and no collapsible or folding stock, is just as potentially lethal as any so-called "assault weapon", if not even more so due to its accuracy, particularly at longer ranges, making it a good "sniper rifle" as is demanded when hunting alert game at longer ranges. But nobody's trying to ban hunter's rifles, are they?
So what's the real difference? Looks, mostly.
But, anti-gunners, seeing this, rather than see how ludicrous the assault weapons ban is (Well, they will see it, but they won't admit it), will then try to ban bolt action rifles!
Truth and logic is on our side. Use it.
CJ