Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: 5 bucks says that customs of the middle east 2k years ago are just a tad different than of today, AND lets not forget the king james version of the bible was written(liberally translated) in england several hundred years ago.
|
Liberally translated? on what do you base that?
I have read many different versions of the bible, some older than the KJV. The KJV is th eMOST accurate bible translation out there, unless you wish to learn to read Greek, Aramaic, and a fistful of other ancient and mostly dead languages. The old Latin bibles can be just plan scary.
Just because a king had a group of translators working to translate holy scripture does not make it liberally translated, nor does it mean it was translated to say what he wished it to say, that tended to be the providence of Rome
| Your right, just because a king had it translated doesn't in itself mean it was changed, but it was. At one point I was studying to be a youth minister and we were forbiddin from even having one as it was so different. Not to mention the basic premise of this being the south and no one here speaks the kings english.
Back to the original question now of why so many people interpret the bible with a western attitude. We are western, and times do change. I don't think today's modern middle eastern customs are quite the same as that past. On the theology side of it, I have my beliefs and no one out there can, or will, change them. On the historical side of it, the KJV is historically known to have "lost something in translation"
|
And what version would you prefer? I have yet o hear of any church (well, I can think of two, but they have issues to begine with) that say the KJV has been changed in a major way, we are nto talkign about the NIV here people. As for studying to be a Minister, I have little faith in what any Chucrch teaches ministers about how well a scripture was translated. I sat down with Books and translation dictionairies to figure out which I beleived, not to mention just comparing different versions of the bibles, I HAVE run into some printings of KJV that had errors, done the same with NIV, Gideons, some that really don't have a version (My adulterer's bible for one)
Not that it matters, we all have faith in our respective books, and are unlikely to change our minds on them
and as to the Western view, we are in fact western, so we will of course have a bias in that direction, I also don't believe Middle Eastern society as it was is anywhere near what it is, for one it used to be a highly educated and enlightened society, full of marvels and invention, not anymore. It also used to be closer to what is classified as a free society,
****Edited****<va-gunnut>, women may not have had much in the way of freedom, but that was not that different anywhere in the known world at the time. Men were free, even to the practicing of religion, somewhat....
But I digress, I truly believe where we live and how we are raised puts the bias to our depictions (BTW my church does not depict Christ as a whiteman, but as a middle eastern gentleman, even if he does have somewhat lighter skin than some ME men, and we do realize that he was Jewish, Hell, I met a preacher who insisted Christ was Baptist because John Baptized him...... Didn't seem to understand that Baptist is a title not necessarily a name)