I have the Stylus Tough 6000, and generally like it. It is great for my "new" lifestyle of travelling with an infant, spending time on the water, and generally beating the heck out of it. Some down-sides:
1. Shutter lag can be AWFUL in some lighting/focusing situations.
2. Low-light performance is not ideal- the flash is too powerful on close subjects, and fairly short-range.
3. Picture quality is generally pretty good, however, high-iso performance is what you expect from a p&s. It just isn't there.
My observations to the good:
1. The camera is pretty solidly constructed. I have not tested the drop height claim, because I am kind of suspect of that one, but I HAVE spent a fair amount of time in/on the water with it (jetski, boat, pool), and it has survived just fine. Underwater pictures can actually be pretty good, presuming adequate light (clear water, close to the surface).
2. Some of my favorite pictures of my son are with this camera, because it was the one that I had, or the one that would survive where I was at right that moment. The dSLR obviously does better, but I can't carry it in my pocket.
3. The instructions say, "if you get it wet in anything other than clean water, rinse it off with clean water" - and I do this. I dump bottled water on it when it gets salt water on it, it may be unnecessary, but the camera is in near perfect condition after 8 months of abuse/exposure.
I ultimately think these cameras are a little spendy when looking at just the camera features/image quality, but they are not badly priced when considering the ruggedness. I would buy the 6000 again, I probably wouldn't (still) pony up for the 8000 unless I needed the additional ruggedness. I can't see image quality changing a whole lot.
shooter