Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 8/17/2018 10:54:31 AM EDT
Up to 25% off refurb at Nikon

Nikon Refurb Sale
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:22:20 PM EDT
[#1]
Anyone have any experience with the Nikon 10-20? I was pretty set on the Tolina 11-16, but that is cheaper than the tokina...
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 7:44:53 PM EDT
[#2]
I was actually about to post on this.  

Free shipping over $100 btw.  All prices posted are my quick 'guesstimates' but should be pretty ballpark.

Screaming deals highlighted in red with a reason why.  Exception is the DSLR cameras as those are pretty obvious on why.

D610 $1200
D750 $1350
D810 $2000
D7500 $900
D7200 $700

200mm f/2 VRII $4600
300mm f/2.8 VRII $3500
70-200mm f/2.8 FL $2250
24-70mm f/2.8 VR $1977
70-200mm f/2.8 VRII $1800
300mm f/4 PF $1625
14-24mm f/2.8 $1450
24-70mm f/2.8G $1350
200-500mm f/5.6 $1100 Damned good lens for the $$$.  They don't get as much reach as the Sigma and Tamron 150-600mm lenses, but fixed aperture and better optically IMO.  Love mine.
70-200mm f/4 $1000
24-120mm f/4 $500  Fantastic 'walking around' lens.  If I had $500 I'd snag one in a heartbeat.  Trying to sell my 24-70mm f/2.8 for one.  Yes, they are that nice.
105mm f/2.8G IF-ED $640
20mm f/1.8G $620
24mm f/1.8G $550
28mm f/1.8G $500
70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 AF-P FX ED $460  Can't be beat on a camera that can use the AF-P lenses.
70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED $350 Best sub $700 telephoto out there for Nikon that isn't an AF-P lens.  Seriously shoots way above it's bracket.
85mm f/1.8G $350  Sharp as holy fuck.  WAY underrated lens and I freaking love mine.
50mm f/1.8G $150
Link Posted: 8/18/2018 11:28:44 AM EDT
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Anyone have any experience with the Nikon 10-20? I was pretty set on the Tolina 11-16, but that is cheaper than the tokina...
View Quote
Are you looking at the "AF-P DX NIKKOR 10-20mm f/4.5-5.6G VR?" I am have one, and I really like it, personally I can't tell any image difference between my 10-24. If you don't need the f/3.5 and you have a newer AF-P compatible body, it is a good lens.  It is way lighter than my 10-24, because it is mostly plastic. I know many pros have a disdain for non-metal lens bodies, but I personally have a huge respect for plastic(aka polymer) witness the Glocks, Walther, and S&W guns, pretty tough stuff. Before buying be sure to check Nikon's list for compatible bodies, some may require firmware updates, which takes 2 minutes after you've done your 1st one. This lens is also way lighter on the wallet at >60% of the price of the Nikon 10-24.

BTW one last cravat, if you order direct from Nikon they will charge you sales tax.
Link Posted: 8/18/2018 1:46:22 PM EDT
[#4]
THANKS just pick up a 50mm fixed 1.8
Link Posted: 8/18/2018 3:11:14 PM EDT
[#5]
I need a 50/1.8 but it'll wait.  I have my 35/1.8 that covers pretty well.

I want to get the 70-300 P VR next.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top