Here's what you should be able to do according to a Physical Training blurb from a British Army publication:
1. Run 3 miles in boots in less than 29 minutes.
2. Complete a full assault course.
3. Jump into water from a height of 6ft and tread water for two minutes and then swim 100 meters.
4. Cover 10 miles, climb a 6ft wall, jump a 9ft ditch (I hope that's swinging with a rope), and then carry a man 200 meters.
Heck, if you can do all that, obviously you're in good shape. The key is really overall fitness. A good Physical Training (PT) program would be varied and broad enough that the above 4 standards should be attainable. Go for an overall fitness level that will allow you to achieve the above 4 goals. If you can do that, you'd be in good shape.
What I'm saying is to be carful how you use any comparison to US standards. They aren't the ones you're going to be training for. We only test the push-up, sit-up and 2 mile run. The other US services vary somewhat, but it's pretty similar. While the US scoring system is a good one to use, you're not going to be scored by the US system so don't get too wrapped up in it. I'm willing to bet that the Australian system of testing battle fitness is going to be more invovled and similar to those 4 point standards above. Use the US point system as a way to keep track of progress, but don't neglect the rest of overall fitness. While those three events are the only ones we test for in the US, the actual training in the Army at least was broad based and varied enough for overall fitness conditioning. It's just we only test those three. Find out what the Australian Army tests for and train for that, but again, don't neglect other types of exercise drills.
Ross