User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 8/4/2022 9:54:47 AM EDT
[#1]
|
|
|
|
NY, USA
|
Posted: 8/4/2022 10:27:04 AM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By fighter443: https://apnews.com/article/gun-violence-us-supreme-court-colorado-shootings-politics-f919b74dc95062f322389349f35c0e93 Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By fighter443: https://apnews.com/article/gun-violence-us-supreme-court-colorado-shootings-politics-f919b74dc95062f322389349f35c0e93 Not all those lawsuits will necessarily be successful. The Texas attorney general, for example, argues the Supreme Court ruling doesn't affect the state's age limit law, and more state and local governments can certainly defend their gun laws as being in line with U.S. history. Adam Skaggs, chief counsel and policy director at the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, predicted that when the dust settles, only laws "along the margins" will eventually be struck down. "Most judges are going to see these for what they are, which is overreaching and lacking in any merit," he said. Backers of gun restrictions can also look to a concurring opinion from Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Joined by Chief Justice John Roberts, Kavanaugh stressed that the Second Amendment does allow for a "variety" of gun regulations. He cited the use of background checks and mental health records as part of a licensing process to carry a gun and noted that states can forbid the carrying of firearms in "sensitive places" such as schools and government buildings. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/4/2022 10:30:32 AM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NoloContendere: https://c.tenor.com/b2VkoMV4hrYAAAAC/tombstone-im-your-huckleberry.gif Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NoloContendere: Originally Posted By HiramRanger: August 23 can't get here soon enough https://c.tenor.com/b2VkoMV4hrYAAAAC/tombstone-im-your-huckleberry.gif You spelled "bitch" wrong... 
|
|
|
|
NY, USA
|
Posted: 8/4/2022 6:53:59 PM EDT
[#4]
Sensitive spaces and private property bans will be used by antigun states to make carry practically useless. Kavanaugh is typical of the 'sensitive' blather - oh, churches are sensitive as God might turn him into a pillar of salt for allowing a gun in church. No crazy will come to a library - or perhaps someone will read a book and that will turn a licensed carrier into a maniac. Lot of evidence of that, Beer Boy.
So loosening up the laws to get useless permits and higher capacity guns that you can't carry - so what. Scotus lives in an ivory tower of theoretic RKBA but has little idea of the day to day life of gun carry. They babble about levels of scrutiny, historical precedent and then leave tremendous loopholes to make the permits useless. They could have precluded this if they had truly thought about it. They are not that committed or bright. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/4/2022 7:06:30 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By EXSUNY: Sensitive spaces and private property bans will be used by antigun states to make carry practically useless. Kavanaugh is typical of the 'sensitive' blather - oh, churches are sensitive as God might turn him into a pillar of salt for allowing a gun in church. No crazy will come to a library - or perhaps someone will read a book and that will turn a licensed carrier into a maniac. Lot of evidence of that, Beer Boy. So loosening up the laws to get useless permits and higher capacity guns that you can't carry - so what. Scotus lives in an ivory tower of theoretic RKBA but has little idea of the day to day life of gun carry. They babble about levels of scrutiny, historical precedent and then leave tremendous loopholes to make the permits useless. They could have precluded this if they had truly thought about it. They are not that committed or bright. Welcome fellow Gun enthusiast… |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/4/2022 7:48:01 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By EXSUNY: Sensitive spaces and private property bans will be used by antigun states to make carry practically useless. Kavanaugh is typical of the 'sensitive' blather - oh, churches are sensitive as God might turn him into a pillar of salt for allowing a gun in church. No crazy will come to a library - or perhaps someone will read a book and that will turn a licensed carrier into a maniac. Lot of evidence of that, Beer Boy. So loosening up the laws to get useless permits and higher capacity guns that you can't carry - so what. Scotus lives in an ivory tower of theoretic RKBA but has little idea of the day to day life of gun carry. They babble about levels of scrutiny, historical precedent and then leave tremendous loopholes to make the permits useless. They could have precluded this if they had truly thought about it. They are not that committed or bright. CSB |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2022 12:53:36 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By EXSUNY: Sensitive spaces and private property bans will be used by antigun states to make carry practically useless. Kavanaugh is typical of the 'sensitive' blather - oh, churches are sensitive as God might turn him into a pillar of salt for allowing a gun in church. No crazy will come to a library - or perhaps someone will read a book and that will turn a licensed carrier into a maniac. Lot of evidence of that, Beer Boy. So loosening up the laws to get useless permits and higher capacity guns that you can't carry - so what. Scotus lives in an ivory tower of theoretic RKBA but has little idea of the day to day life of gun carry. They babble about levels of scrutiny, historical precedent and then leave tremendous loopholes to make the permits useless. They could have precluded this if they had truly thought about it. They are not that committed or bright. Welcome……but we know what your agenda is Say hi to Kathy |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 8/5/2022 2:49:26 PM EDT
[#8]
Disgruntled former state employee caught up in the SUNY scandal?
|
|
|
NY, USA
|
Posted: 8/5/2022 6:19:35 PM EDT
[#9]
What are you talking about? My point was that the new law will negate useful permits and that is a problem. How is that supporting Hochul or having anything to do with SUNY scandals? Agenda - I think reading comprehension might be a problem for some.
The laws in response to the decision on 9/1 makes the permits useless. Scotus location ban language seemed to suggest the path for this. NOW, do you understand? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/6/2022 9:45:38 AM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By EXSUNY: What are you talking about? My point was that the new law will negate useful permits and that is a problem. How is that supporting Hochul or having anything to do with SUNY scandals? Agenda - I think reading comprehension might be a problem for some. The laws in response to the decision on 9/1 makes the permits useless. Scotus location ban language seemed to suggest the path for this. NOW, do you understand?  |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/6/2022 11:02:40 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By EXSUNY: What are you talking about? My point was that the new law will negate useful permits and that is a problem. How is that supporting Hochul or having anything to do with SUNY scandals? Agenda - I think reading comprehension might be a problem for some. The laws in response to the decision on 9/1 makes the permits useless. Scotus location ban language seemed to suggest the path for this. NOW, do you understand? How pray tell did the ruling which says you cannot make everything a restricted or sensitive place pave the way for them to make EVERYTHING A RESTRICTED OR SENSITIVE PLACE? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/6/2022 12:26:18 PM EDT
[Last Edit: DaveM4P99]
[#12]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By HiramRanger: How pray tell did the ruling which says you cannot make everything a restricted or sensitive place pave the way for them to make EVERYTHING A RESTRICTED OR SENSITIVE PLACE? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By HiramRanger: Originally Posted By EXSUNY: What are you talking about? My point was that the new law will negate useful permits and that is a problem. How is that supporting Hochul or having anything to do with SUNY scandals? Agenda - I think reading comprehension might be a problem for some. The laws in response to the decision on 9/1 makes the permits useless. Scotus location ban language seemed to suggest the path for this. NOW, do you understand? How pray tell did the ruling which says you cannot make everything a restricted or sensitive place pave the way for them to make EVERYTHING A RESTRICTED OR SENSITIVE PLACE? Yeah really. The majority opinion, which is the only opinion that holds the weght of law and sets precedence, says it quite well. SCOTUS was crystal clear, especially with text history and tradition as the bar. It's the low IQ NY state attorneys and legislators that don't understand the ruling enough to realize every gun law they have passed and are trying to pass is unconstitutional. No questions about it now. NY and Hochul drafted this concealed carry improvement law years ago hoping for intermediate scrutiny or a watered down strict scrutiny. When Thomas dropped the bomb of text history and tradition, they quickly started to re-write the law to comply, but quickly realized that every statute in the law was a no-go with the Thomas ruling. So they said fuck it and passed the whole law without changes. How is this not clear?   And then a nice little twist of the knife to strike AWBs and mag laws and ammo restriction laws...  And the Kavanaugh concurrence that everyone thinks affirms licensing but actually just says "this ruling wasn't asked to address licensing, but we know licensing in most liberal states is BS...so bring us a suit and we will overturn licensing too:"  And really you don't even need any of these gems to eviscerate gun laws... Did they have laws in the late 1700s that banned carry basically everywhere? No. Maybe a couple old English laws banning carry in certain flammable areas...but that was fire code due to black powder. Not applicable today. Did they have laws in the 1700s banning certain guns? Nope. Did they have laws banning the making of homemade guns? Nope. Did they require training and licensing to own a gun in the late 1700s? Nope. If there was no analogous law it's unconstitutional. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/6/2022 12:58:27 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By DaveM4P99: Yeah really. The majority opinion, which is the only opinion that holds the weght of law and sets precedence, says it quite well. SCOTUS was crystal clear, especially with text history and tradition as the bar. It's the low IQ NY state attorneys and legislators that don't understand the ruling enough to realize every gun law they have passed and are trying to pass is unconstitutional. No questions about it now. NY and Hochul drafted this concealed carry improvement law years ago hoping for intermediate scrutiny or a watered down strict scrutiny. When Thomas dropped the bomb of text history and tradition, they quickly started to re-write the law to comply, but quickly realized that every statute in the law was a no-go with the Thomas ruling. So they said fuck it and passed the whole law without changes. How is this not clear? https://i.imgur.com/0Esnrsx.png https://i.imgur.com/wdOdjLL.jpeg And then a nice little twist of the knife to strike AWBs and mag laws and ammo restriction laws... https://i.imgur.com/B9oEGdk.png And the Kavanaugh concurrence that everyone thinks affirms licensing but actually just says "this ruling wasn't asked to address licensing, but we know licensing in most liberal states is BS...so bring us a suit and we will overturn licensing too:" https://i.imgur.com/YADhiML.png And really you don't even need any of these gems to eviscerate gun laws... Did they have laws in the late 1700s that banned carry basically everywhere? No. Maybe a couple old English laws banning carry in certain flammable areas...but that was fire code due to black powder. Not applicable today. Did they have laws in the 1700s banning certain guns? Nope. Did they have laws banning the making of homemade guns? Nope. Did they require training and licensing to own a gun in the late 1700s? Nope. If there was no analogous law it's unconstitutional.  |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/6/2022 1:12:52 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By DaveM4P99: Yeah really. The majority opinion, which is the only opinion that holds the weght of law and sets precedence, says it quite well. SCOTUS was crystal clear, especially with text history and tradition as the bar. It's the low IQ NY state attorneys and legislators that don't understand the ruling enough to realize every gun law they have passed and are trying to pass is unconstitutional. No questions about it now. NY and Hochul drafted this concealed carry improvement law years ago hoping for intermediate scrutiny or a watered down strict scrutiny. When Thomas dropped the bomb of text history and tradition, they quickly started to re-write the law to comply, but quickly realized that every statute in the law was a no-go with the Thomas ruling. So they said fuck it and passed the whole law without changes. How is this not clear? https://i.imgur.com/0Esnrsx.png https://i.imgur.com/wdOdjLL.jpeg And then a nice little twist of the knife to strike AWBs and mag laws and ammo restriction laws... https://i.imgur.com/B9oEGdk.png And the Kavanaugh concurrence that everyone thinks affirms licensing but actually just says "this ruling wasn't asked to address licensing, but we know licensing in most liberal states is BS...so bring us a suit and we will overturn licensing too:" https://i.imgur.com/YADhiML.png And really you don't even need any of these gems to eviscerate gun laws... Did they have laws in the late 1700s that banned carry basically everywhere? No. Maybe a couple old English laws banning carry in certain flammable areas...but that was fire code due to black powder. Not applicable today. Did they have laws in the 1700s banning certain guns? Nope. Did they have laws banning the making of homemade guns? Nope. Did they require training and licensing to own a gun in the late 1700s? Nope. If there was no analogous law it's unconstitutional. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By DaveM4P99: Originally Posted By HiramRanger: Originally Posted By EXSUNY: What are you talking about? My point was that the new law will negate useful permits and that is a problem. How is that supporting Hochul or having anything to do with SUNY scandals? Agenda - I think reading comprehension might be a problem for some. The laws in response to the decision on 9/1 makes the permits useless. Scotus location ban language seemed to suggest the path for this. NOW, do you understand? How pray tell did the ruling which says you cannot make everything a restricted or sensitive place pave the way for them to make EVERYTHING A RESTRICTED OR SENSITIVE PLACE? Yeah really. The majority opinion, which is the only opinion that holds the weght of law and sets precedence, says it quite well. SCOTUS was crystal clear, especially with text history and tradition as the bar. It's the low IQ NY state attorneys and legislators that don't understand the ruling enough to realize every gun law they have passed and are trying to pass is unconstitutional. No questions about it now. NY and Hochul drafted this concealed carry improvement law years ago hoping for intermediate scrutiny or a watered down strict scrutiny. When Thomas dropped the bomb of text history and tradition, they quickly started to re-write the law to comply, but quickly realized that every statute in the law was a no-go with the Thomas ruling. So they said fuck it and passed the whole law without changes. How is this not clear? https://i.imgur.com/0Esnrsx.png https://i.imgur.com/wdOdjLL.jpeg And then a nice little twist of the knife to strike AWBs and mag laws and ammo restriction laws... https://i.imgur.com/B9oEGdk.png And the Kavanaugh concurrence that everyone thinks affirms licensing but actually just says "this ruling wasn't asked to address licensing, but we know licensing in most liberal states is BS...so bring us a suit and we will overturn licensing too:" https://i.imgur.com/YADhiML.png And really you don't even need any of these gems to eviscerate gun laws... Did they have laws in the late 1700s that banned carry basically everywhere? No. Maybe a couple old English laws banning carry in certain flammable areas...but that was fire code due to black powder. Not applicable today. Did they have laws in the 1700s banning certain guns? Nope. Did they have laws banning the making of homemade guns? Nope. Did they require training and licensing to own a gun in the late 1700s? Nope. If there was no analogous law it's unconstitutional. Thank you…..well said |
|
|
|
NY, USA
|
Posted: 8/6/2022 4:28:14 PM EDT
[#15]
And, you can't make the entire island of Manhattan sensitive BUT you make every business banned unless they specifically allow carry. That destroys useful carry. How many businesses are gong to do that?
If you folks can't understand that this provision on 9/1 is devastating and all the quotes are meaningless if this law operates, you are not just getting it. You can't go into the gas station, the market, etc., etc. Thus, back to court for years of litigation and it is not clear that the court will not decide that this is property rights issue and let it go. Your quotes are meaningless in the operative environment on 9/1 - NO SIGN - you are a felon. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/6/2022 4:51:53 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By EXSUNY: And, you can't make the entire island of Manhattan sensitive BUT you make every business banned unless they specifically allow carry. That destroys useful carry. How many businesses are gong to do that? If you folks can't understand that this provision on 9/1 is devastating and all the quotes are meaningless if this law operates, you are not just getting it. You can't go into the gas station, the market, etc., etc. Thus, back to court for years of litigation and it is not clear that the court will not decide that this is property rights issue and let it go. Your quotes are meaningless in the operative environment on 9/1 - NO SIGN - you are a felon. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/6/2022 5:44:27 PM EDT
[Last Edit: DaveM4P99]
[#17]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By EXSUNY: And, you can't make the entire island of Manhattan sensitive BUT you make every business banned unless they specifically allow carry. That destroys useful carry. How many businesses are gong to do that? If you folks can't understand that this provision on 9/1 is devastating and all the quotes are meaningless if this law operates, you are not just getting it. You can't go into the gas station, the market, etc., etc. Thus, back to court for years of litigation and it is not clear that the court will not decide that this is property rights issue and let it go. Your quotes are meaningless in the operative environment on 9/1 - NO SIGN - you are a felon. That was just Thomas giving an example of a ridiculous sensitive place law...because NY has deemed NYC sensitive since 1911. Thomas clearly says almost no places are sensitive. I'm all for private property rights but the state can't decide that preemptively for all private properties. If a business wants to put up a no guns sign...and you disobey and refuse to leave, it would be a trespassing charge. Should not be anything to do with a weapons charge. Thomas was clear. Now the NY courts just have to abide. Which I agree is the tough part. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/6/2022 10:48:01 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By EXSUNY: And, you can't make the entire island of Manhattan sensitive BUT you make every business banned unless they specifically allow carry. That destroys useful carry. How many businesses are gong to do that? If you folks can't understand that this provision on 9/1 is devastating and all the quotes are meaningless if this law operates, you are not just getting it. You can't go into the gas station, the market, etc., etc. Thus, back to court for years of litigation and it is not clear that the court will not decide that this is property rights issue and let it go. Your quotes are meaningless in the operative environment on 9/1 - NO SIGN - you are a felon. Just JB Weld a "Guns Allowed" sign near the entrance on your way in. 
|
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 8/6/2022 11:22:35 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By fighter443: I'm fairly certain all of us here understand what is going on. Yep, especially since we have had numerous threads on it but the new guy just jumped in. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/8/2022 10:48:15 AM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By EXSUNY: And, you can't make the entire island of Manhattan sensitive BUT you make every business banned unless they specifically allow carry. That destroys useful carry. How many businesses are gong to do that? If you folks can't understand that this provision on 9/1 is devastating and all the quotes are meaningless if this law operates, you are not just getting it. You can't go into the gas station, the market, etc., etc. Thus, back to court for years of litigation and it is not clear that the court will not decide that this is property rights issue and let it go. Your quotes are meaningless in the operative environment on 9/1 - NO SIGN - you are a felon. Yeah thanks pal... none of us were aware of that until you graced us with your presence... Might be why we pushed for Nolo to come here to fight this. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/8/2022 11:24:51 AM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By DaveM4P99: Yeah really. The majority opinion, which is the only opinion that holds the weght of law and sets precedence, says it quite well. SCOTUS was crystal clear, especially with text history and tradition as the bar. It's the low IQ NY state attorneys and legislators that don't understand the ruling enough to realize every gun law they have passed and are trying to pass is unconstitutional. No questions about it now. They understand. They just don't care. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/8/2022 1:02:37 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By BushBoar: They understand. They just don't care. Throw enough crap against the wall and some is bound to stick. Brought to you by the poo flinging apes in the NYS legislature. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/8/2022 1:26:44 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Bushman_269: Throw enough crap against the wall and some is bound to stick. Brought to you by the poo flinging apes in the NYS legislature. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Bushman_269: Originally Posted By BushBoar: They understand. They just don't care. Throw enough crap against the wall and some is bound to stick. Brought to you by the poo flinging apes in the NYS legislature. Why do you have to insult apes dude? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/8/2022 7:40:34 PM EDT
[#24]
I miss the old days, when @highspeedforlife was the gatekeeper for the new guys - no one was welcome anywhere!
Yes, they purposefully have passed stupid legislation that cannot justified legally in light of the Supreme Court. We know. |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 8/8/2022 7:52:11 PM EDT
[#25]
They understand. Don’t underestimate politicians. This was a big FU to SCOTUS. And to the Upstate voters.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/9/2022 6:39:10 AM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Abom: They understand. Don't underestimate politicians. This was a big FU to SCOTUS. And to the Upstate voters. That's why I think nolo is notifying so many of the counties that their qualified immunity is null and void and he I'll be suing them personally. |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 8/9/2022 7:34:15 AM EDT
[#27]
22ers
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 8/10/2022 12:02:06 PM EDT
[#28]
***Last call***
Anyone interested in joining us for dinner w/ Nolo in Syracuse on Monday 8/22 at around 5:30-6pm, please DM me. Do not email me from the site. We will pick a spot this weekend and communicate plans via DM. Those of you who have already contacted me are good to go, I’ve got you on the list already. Hoping to see many of you 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2022 7:10:21 PM EDT
[#29]
I filed for a permit renewal over a month and a half ago.
The county of Nassau charged my credit card. I spoke with pistol licensing and they have my permit renewal info. I have yet to receive a new permit. Here I sit with an expired permit now. Anyone else having this issue? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2022 7:05:12 AM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Adirondack47: ***Last call*** Anyone interested in joining us for dinner w/ Nolo in Syracuse on Monday 8/22 at around 5:30-6pm, please DM me. Do not email me from the site. We will pick a spot this weekend and communicate plans via DM. Those of you who have already contacted me are good to go, I’ve got you on the list already. Hoping to see many of you Great, another list I'm on... 
|
|
|
|
NY, USA
|
Posted: 8/11/2022 10:23:03 AM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By fighter443: The county of Nassau charged my credit card.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2022 10:34:20 AM EDT
[Last Edit: sherm8404]
[#32]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NoloContendere: is valerie the person that would remove your restriction? the guidance came from the Supreme Court, so if "her" decision is predicated on "proper cause" which is unconstitutional, i would not like to be her at this moment. Valerie is a clerk there. |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 8/16/2022 11:58:30 PM EDT
[#33]
@nolocontendere what can you tell us about the states response today?
|
|
|
NY, USA
|
Posted: 8/17/2022 5:06:30 AM EDT
[#34]
Knowing NYS, what “stick” does SCOTUS have that would ever make NYS comply with their decision?
NYS operates as a nation unto itself. |
|
|
NY, USA
|
Posted: 8/17/2022 9:14:42 AM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By BillyBones: Knowing NYS, what "stick" does SCOTUS have that would ever make NYS comply with their decision? NYS operates as a nation unto itself. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2022 10:10:41 AM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Aardvark: The only "stick" is DOJ and Federal Marshal's or troops like was done to integrate schools down south. But since DOJ is pretty much against private citizenry being armed, I seriously doubt DOJ would file suit against NYS for ignoring a SCOTUS ruling. We will have flying purple unicorn's fa_ting rainbows long before DOJ goes after a state for ignoring the 2nd Amendment. It was nice to believe that the June 23rd (Thomas's and my birthday) Bruen ruling would change things but we already have two post-Bruen rulings out now from courts that basically ignore it. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Aardvark: Originally Posted By BillyBones: Knowing NYS, what "stick" does SCOTUS have that would ever make NYS comply with their decision? NYS operates as a nation unto itself. I believe the "others" case in suffolk, and the other case, which I forget, were argued without taking NYSRPA vs. Bruen into account. It wasn't part of the argument. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2022 11:05:11 AM EDT
[#37]
We're all felons anyway. So if everyone is a felon, nobody is a felon.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2022 12:16:36 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Dopple: We're all felons anyway. So if everyone is a felon, nobody is a felon. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2022 12:32:52 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By DaveM4P99: I believe the "others" case in suffolk, and the other case, which I forget, were argued without taking NYSRPA vs. Bruen into account. It wasn't part of the argument. And that case was pushed back as well. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2022 8:44:22 PM EDT
[#40]
Folks from other Boards hit the roof telling me I was wrong about stripped Lowers, but if you read the language...
|
|
|
|
NY, USA
|
Posted: 8/19/2022 6:20:40 AM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By fp1201: Folks from other Boards hit the roof telling me I was wrong about stripped Lowers, but if you read the language... Wrong how? What do you mean? |
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 8/19/2022 4:38:17 PM EDT
[#42]
PM’s have been sent to those of you who would like to get together with us on Monday evening. If anyone has not gotten one or would like to, PM me.
Looking forward to it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/19/2022 9:22:45 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Adirondack47: PM’s have been sent to those of you who would like to get together with us on Monday evening. If anyone has not gotten one or would like to, PM me. Looking forward to it. I'm absolutely looking forward to it! |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/19/2022 9:25:45 PM EDT
[Last Edit: fp1201]
[#44]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Tahawus: Wrong how? What do you mean? 3. "Firearm" means (a) any pistol or revolver; or (b) a shotgun having one or more barrels less than eighteen inches in length; or (c) a rifle having one or more barrels less than sixteen inches in length; or (d) any weapon made from a shotgun or rifle whether by alteration, modifica- tion, or otherwise if such weapon as altered, modified, or otherwise has an overall length of less than twenty-six inches; or (e) an assault weapon; OR (F) ANY OTHER WEAPON THAT IS NOT OTHERWISE DEFINED IN THIS SECTION CONTAINING ANY COMPONENT THAT PROVIDES HOUSING OR A STRUCTURE DESIGNED TO HOLD OR INTEGRATE ANY FIRE CONTROL COMPONENT THAT IS DESIGNED TO OR MAY READILY BE CONVERTED TO EXPEL A PROJECTILE BY ACTION OF EXPLOSIVE. For the purpose of this subdivision the length of the barrel on a shotgun or rifle shall be determined by measuring the distance between the muzzle and the face of the bolt, breech, or breech- lock when closed and when the shotgun or rifle is cocked; the overall length of a weapon made from a shotgun or rifle is the distance between the extreme ends of the weapon measured along a line parallel to the center line of the bore. Firearm does not include an antique firearm. S-9456 |
|
|
|
NY, USA
|
Posted: 8/19/2022 10:12:05 PM EDT
[#45]
Gotcha.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2022 12:09:05 PM EDT
[#46]
How long will the injunction hearing take ,will it be a few hours or a few days
do any of you guys plan on attending the hearing or are you even allowed to attend thanks for the responses . |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2022 12:38:09 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By cranberry1: How long will the injunction hearing take ,will it be a few hours or a few days do any of you guys plan on attending the hearing or are you even allowed to attend thanks for the responses . Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By cranberry1: How long will the injunction hearing take ,will it be a few hours or a few days do any of you guys plan on attending the hearing or are you even allowed to attend thanks for the responses . Hearing is Tuesday - Originally Posted By NoloContendere: TEXT NOTICE re Motion [9] for Preliminary Injunction filed by Ivan Antonyuk, Gun Owners Foundation, Gun Owners of America New York, Inc., and Gun Owners of America, Inc.: An In-Person Motion Hearing is set for 8/23/2022 at 10:30 AM in Syracuse before Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby. (sal) I was leaving work early Monday to get to dinner on time; I'm tempted to take Tuesday off to go to the hearing but didn't know how much space there was going to be. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2022 2:38:52 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MikeyCNY: Hearing is Tuesday - I was leaving work early Monday to get to dinner on time; I'm tempted to take Tuesday off to go to the hearing but didn't know how much space there was going to be. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MikeyCNY: Originally Posted By cranberry1: How long will the injunction hearing take ,will it be a few hours or a few days do any of you guys plan on attending the hearing or are you even allowed to attend thanks for the responses . Hearing is Tuesday - Originally Posted By NoloContendere: TEXT NOTICE re Motion [9] for Preliminary Injunction filed by Ivan Antonyuk, Gun Owners Foundation, Gun Owners of America New York, Inc., and Gun Owners of America, Inc.: An In-Person Motion Hearing is set for 8/23/2022 at 10:30 AM in Syracuse before Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby. (sal) I was leaving work early Monday to get to dinner on time; I'm tempted to take Tuesday off to go to the hearing but didn't know how much space there was going to be. That’s a concern in terms of capacity. I’m coming in Monday and staying over to attend the hearing if capacity allows. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/22/2022 5:34:40 PM EDT
[#49]
Good luck!
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/22/2022 6:33:06 PM EDT
[#50]
Our thoughts and prayers are with you, God Bless you Nolo for what you do for the Second Amendment!
|
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
