User Panel
The Court said that "sensitive spaces" can be restricted. However, the restricted space must be under immediate police protection i.e. govt building with security checking everyone at the door and able to react to a crime within the space. A park is not that. A store is not that. A library is not that. A restaurant is not that.
These people knowingly violated the rights of New Yorkers. I hope that there are heavy penalties associated with such blatant violations. |
|
Do we know if the social media requirement or live fire applies to the permits for semi autos?
|
|
Looks like this is where they got their list of "sensitive" places. https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2022/07/01/bruen-guns-rights-carry-sensitive-places/
As Timothy Zick and Diana Palmer wrote recently in the Atlantic: Both red and blue states have created an archipelago of “sensitive places,” such as “public transit, polling places … athletic facilities, public swimming pools, riverboat casinos, school-bus stops, pharmacies, business parking lots, public highways, amusement parks, zoos, liquor stores, airports, parades, demonstrations, financial institutions, theaters, hotel lobbies, tribal lands, and even gun shows.” All these sensitive-place designations are now subject to challenge as insufficiently analogous to regulations that existed in the past. View Quote |
|
|
What about all those people in NYC that got a carry permit solely because they deal with cash or jewels on a daily basis and need to carry into banks to make deposits? There are thousands of people who carry because of that in NYC.
Now if that bank doesn't have a "guns allowed" sign, it's a felony. So...carry permits are 100% worthless to those people now. @nolocontendere I hope you have plans to overturn ALL of these BS new laws. Where do we donate???? |
|
|
|
I sure hope that any lawsuits include personal financial penalties for all legislators who willfully voted to violate Constitutional Rights of New Yorkers.
|
|
|
Quoted: The Court said that "sensitive spaces" can be restricted. However, the restricted space must be under immediate police protection i.e. govt building with security checking everyone at the door and able to react to a crime within the space. A park is not that. A store is not that. A library is not that. A restaurant is not that. These people knowingly violated the rights of New Yorkers. I hope that there are heavy penalties associated with such blatant violations. View Quote This should be hugely important. No carry sensitive places almost makes sense if there is an adequate number of armed LE to immediately protect everyone. If Hochul wants to make everywhere sensitive let her pay for constant SP presence everywhere. If dems want to take things backward force them to put police presence in schools if they want schools to be gun free, eta - And everybody who is a victim of crime in a 'sensitive' but unprotected place should immediately sue NYS |
|
HTF is anybody going to pass a qualification when you can't touch a handgun in NY unless you have a permit?
|
|
It looks like NY has actually opened the door to out of state carry….
“NONRESIDENTS OF THE STATE PARTICIPATING IN ANY LAWFUL RECREATIONAL FIREARMS RELATED ACTIVITY, AND WHILE IN THE COURSE OF TRAVELING TO AND FROM SUCH RECREATION ACTIVITY” Any lawful recreational activity and traveling to and from is pretty broad |
|
I started a fundraiser on Facebook for SAF for future legal action.
https://www.facebook.com/donate/601738927890400/ If not allowed here please delete. |
|
|
Quoted: This should be hugely important. No carry sensitive places almost makes sense if there is an adequate number of armed LE to immediately protect everyone. If Hochul wants to make everywhere sensitive let her pay for constant SP presence everywhere. If dems want to take things backward force them to put police presence in schools if they want schools to be gun free, eta - And everybody who is a victim of crime in a 'sensitive' but unprotected place should immediately sue NYS View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: The Court said that "sensitive spaces" can be restricted. However, the restricted space must be under immediate police protection i.e. govt building with security checking everyone at the door and able to react to a crime within the space. A park is not that. A store is not that. A library is not that. A restaurant is not that. These people knowingly violated the rights of New Yorkers. I hope that there are heavy penalties associated with such blatant violations. This should be hugely important. No carry sensitive places almost makes sense if there is an adequate number of armed LE to immediately protect everyone. If Hochul wants to make everywhere sensitive let her pay for constant SP presence everywhere. If dems want to take things backward force them to put police presence in schools if they want schools to be gun free, eta - And everybody who is a victim of crime in a 'sensitive' but unprotected place should immediately sue NYS |
|
|
|
|
Quoted: If you read the text, there is an exemption for possession of a weapon during a training class. They covered it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Exactly. They effectively made it impossible to get a CCW by implementing that. If you read the text, there is an exemption for possession of a weapon during a training class. They covered it. Lol so you show up to the class having never fired a handgun before and they expect you to pass an arbitrary shooting test? |
|
|
Quoted: Lol so you show up to the class having never fired a handgun before and they expect you to pass an arbitrary shooting test? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Exactly. They effectively made it impossible to get a CCW by implementing that. If you read the text, there is an exemption for possession of a weapon during a training class. They covered it. Lol so you show up to the class having never fired a handgun before and they expect you to pass an arbitrary shooting test? Good point |
|
|
So with NY banning carry in ALL private businesses unless they put up a "guns allowed" sign...
What if a business doesn't have the "guns allowed" sign...and someone gets caught carrying there...but the business doesn't want to press charges or maybe they forgot to put up the sign? What? The state just prosecutes the person anyway? That is not going to stand in any court except a kangaroo court...which we don't have a shortage of in NY unfortunately. |
|
Hell, the first issue is for the training program to actually exist.
They're supposed to go from zero to training and testing almost everybody with a current license plus all new applicants in a year. Doesn't sound to me like something the ny govt is capable of. |
|
Quoted: So with NY banning carry in ALL private businesses unless they put up a "guns allowed" sign... What if a business doesn't have the "guns allowed" sign...and someone gets caught carrying there...but the business doesn't want to press charges or maybe they forgot to put up the sign? What? The state just prosecutes the person anyway? That is not going to stand in any court except a kangaroo court...which we don't have a shortage of in NY unfortunately. View Quote There is something in the text that there does not have to be a sign as such. The business can 'otherwise give express consent'. |
|
Quoted: Lol so you show up to the class having never fired a handgun before and they expect you to pass an arbitrary shooting test? View Quote I would guess they would expect you to pay for training prior to taking your test. No desire to be stomped by my fellow HTF peeps but I would hope anyone looking to carry a handgun who has no prior experience would seek out some training for their own benefit, their own safety, and for everyone else's safety. |
|
Quoted: I would guess they would expect you to pay for training prior to taking your test. No desire to be stomped by my fellow HTF peeps but I would hope anyone looking to carry a handgun who has no prior experience would seek out some training for their own benefit, their own safety, and for everyone else's safety. View Quote How about you just get a carry license, then take it upon yourself to just practice, or pay for training if you can afford it. State mandated training is bs. Also...shooting a pistol at usual sd distances (7 yards) isn't exactly rocket surgery. I was doing it when I was 7 years old. |
|
|
Quoted: How about you just get a carry license, then take it upon yourself to just practice, or pay for training if you can afford it. State mandated training is bs. Also...shooting a pistol at usual sd distances (7 yards) isn't exactly rocket surgery. I was doing it when I was 7 years old. View Quote I was not agreeing with the states mandated training. It may not be rocket science to hit a target at 7 yards but I can assure you there are people who cannot do it. I spent years as RO doing sub-gun matches as well as 2 and 3 gun matches mixed in and I watched guys who owned various firearms for years who could not hit jack. I watched guys with years of gun handling experience violate the most basic firearms safety rules. |
|
I've been googling and it looks like most states have a stupid easy test.
This looks like about as serious as it gets(I think it's texas) full size silo target 175/250 to pass my sample of what it takes to pass 100/100 at 3 yards 20 shots 75/100 at 7 yards 20 shots 10 shots at 15 yards where you shouldn't even need any points make up a few if you blew a few at 7 looks like you have to handle malfs live or take lost points most rapid fire stage is 5 in 15 seconds no hot reloads most fails are being stupidly unsafe, not the shooting score not guarantee ours will be even close but it's something to think about https://www.licensetocarry.com/top-10-reasons-why-students-fail-the-ltc-proficiency-demonstration/ |
|
Sales of "Weapons Permitted" stickers are gonna soar. Guess I'll just have to slap one on every door I open.
|
|
Quoted: What about all those people in NYC that got a carry permit solely because they deal with cash or jewels on a daily basis and need to carry into banks to make deposits? There are thousands of people who carry because of that in NYC. Now if that bank doesn't have a "guns allowed" sign, it's a felony. So...carry permits are 100% worthless to those people now. @nolocontendere I hope you have plans to overturn ALL of these BS new laws. Where do we donate???? View Quote |
|
Quoted: HTF is anybody going to pass a qualification when you can't touch a handgun in NY unless you have a permit? View Quote Sure, Someone that’s never touched a gun before is going to get 80% in the x ring at 150 feet no problem. |
|
The State of New York does not have a true constitutional provision for the right to bear arms. However, the state's Civil Rights Law includes the following provision:
State Right to Bear Arms in New York Civil Rights Law art. II, § 4 provides that " [a] well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms cannot be infringed." Infringement: To break a law or pact, or encroach upon the rights of others. |
|
Quoted: So if the bank does not put up the signs, what about armed security? View Quote Certified armed security is an exemption. Only where they work while working, even they can't carry in any other sensitive area. I don't see any allowance for private bodyguards. Unless you're so vitally important to society that your security details is cops, of course. |
|
Quoted: Sales of "Weapons Permitted" stickers are gonna soar. Guess I'll just have to slap one on every door I open. View Quote How about real small signs put on the lower corners of windows and doors? Maybe even clear background stickers…. Barely noticeable. Must be high quality stickers to last decades. |
|
Ok, so if there is an exemption for armed security.
What if everyone becomes an armed security guard? I was hired to protect this child (my child). |
|
|
|
|
Lanza gets it. They are mocking us and the SC.
Senator Andrew Lanza Speaks on Senate Bill S51001 |
|
This is what it looks like when tyrannical ideologue's only concerned with power take over your state. They completely ignore the law and Constitution because it's suits their personal predilections, not those whom they were elected to serve. People are sometimes curious what life was like in 1776. Look around you now.
|
|
Quoted: 4) Database of all ammunition purchases 6) Background checks on ammunition purchases through the State Police. Another section creates a "background check fund" to finance this. View Quote Couple of things I noticed in re-reading the PDF this morning 1- Ammunition tracking wont just be for ammunition sales. It requires documenting ammunition received. Heaven help the small FFL who's off on his ammunition inventory Of course, after December the ammunition has to be kept out of reach of customers, but still, thats a mess. The state is taking on not just the background check for ammo, but taking over the background check on firearms transfers. You know that NYS wont be doing that for free. How much do other states charge per transfer? Five bucks? Ten bucks? You can bet that NYS will aim for their fee to be punitive, something in the range of $20-25 per check. Gotta rake those evil gun owners over the coals.... |
|
Since airports are now sensitive places does this mean you can not bring a rifle to transport to another state to hunt?
|
|
|
Quoted: This is all about concealed carry not about unloaded cased firearms for transport. View Quote Not the way I read it. "CRIMINAL POSSESSION OF A FIREARM, RIFLE OR SHOTGUN IN A SENSITIVE LOCATION IS A CLASS E FELONY." " 1. A PERSON IS GUILTY OF CRIMINAL POSSESSION OF A FIREARM, RIFLE OR SHOTGUN IN A SENSITIVE LOCATION WHEN SUCH PERSON POSSESSES A FIREARM, RIFLE OR SHOTGUN IN OR UPON A SENSITIVE LOCATION, AND SUCH PERSON KNOWS OR REASONABLY SHOULD KNOW SUCH LOCATION IS A SENSITIVE LOCATION." |
|
Quoted: This is all about concealed carry not about unloaded cased firearms for transport. View Quote In intent, yes. but even where they don't intend to be evil, they're still incompetent. What the text does is ban possession of a firearm,rifle or pistol almost everywhere. I see no exemption for secured transport. It seems quite possible to be a felon for a shotgun locked in your trunk if you drive in the wrong place. Carrying a locked case into an airport does seem to be a problem as the law stands. |
|
So is the background check for purchasing a firearm conducted by the NYSP. Are they actually doing the NICS check as well? I thought Vermont tried that and it didn't work? Or is this just a step beyond after the NICS check?
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.