User Panel
[#1]
my fear is that all a convention will get us is socialism hard coded into the Constitution and gun rights explicitly denied
|
|
[#2]
|
|
[#3]
Quoted:
Like the SAFE Act? lol View Quote People also forget that the state constitution is subservient to the U.S. Constitution. They can put an anti-Second Amendment in the state constitution but if SCOTUS finally releases a strong pro-Second Amendment ruling, a state constitutional prohibition would be null and void. |
|
[#4]
Quoted:
LOL People also forget that the state constitution is subservient to the U.S. Constitution. They can put an anti-Second Amendment in the state constitution but if SCOTUS finally releases a strong pro-Second Amendment ruling, a state constitutional prohibition would be null and void. View Quote |
|
[#5]
3 delegates are selected from each of the 63 state senate districts (32D to 31R) and 15 elected statewide (likely all D). If someone has time they can overlay the state senate district with 2016 election results to get an idea of the type of delegates that may be send and possible breakdown.
http://www.nypirg.org/goodgov/concon/con_con_merged_final.pdf |
|
[#6]
|
|
[#7]
Quoted:
my fear is that all a convention will get us is socialism hard coded into the Constitution and gun rights explicitly denied View Quote NOW IS THE TIME |
|
[#8]
It's too late in our decline to work. I fear an armed revolution and civil war is in our future.
|
|
[#9]
|
|
[#10]
Quoted:
3 delegates are selected from each of the 63 state senate districts (32D to 31R) and 15 elected statewide (likely all D). If someone has time they can overlay the state senate district with 2016 election results to get an idea of the type of delegates that may be send and possible breakdown. http://www.nypirg.org/goodgov/concon/con_con_merged_final.pdf View Quote |
|
[#11]
|
|
[#12]
Quoted:
Given that all but 3 or 4 counties upstate passed anti safe act resolutions it seems like a pro 2a result has a decent chance. From a 2a perspective things can't get much worse. If Cuomo tries to raid the pension funds maybe that will be enough to finally get rid of him at the ballot box. Using a con con to "finish us off" is silly at the state level, they don't need it and as long as the scotus refuses to hear 2a cases they have nothing to worry about. View Quote |
|
[#13]
Quoted:
I think a lot of that would hinge on supporters of any amendments actually getting out to vote yes on them if they made it to the ballot. Gun owners couldn't even get out and vote against Cuomo in the last election, I don't hold much more hope for them getting out to vote on an amendment. But I don't disagree that there is potential. That's why I don't understand why the state gun groups haven't been more involved with a plan. I haven't heard anything official from NYSRPA or SCOPE. View Quote |
|
[#14]
|
|
[#15]
Quoted:
This doesn't make any sense. Are you saying that every voter who doesn't vote is being counted as a yes? View Quote It is expected that many will either miss the ballot question or decide it's too complex and just desiring the status quo, not enter a vote. So in that sense, a non-vote favors the yes crowd. |
|
[#16]
Quoted:
It's not quite true, but a reduction on the number of supporters necessary to make it pass. For example, let's say there are 100 voters, 26 vote "yes," 24 vote "no," and 50 don't vote... that means the measure passes even though only 26% of the population are actually in support of "yes." It is expected that many will either miss the ballot question or decide it's too complex and just desiring the status quo, not enter a vote. So in that sense, a non-vote favors the yes crowd. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
This doesn't make any sense. Are you saying that every voter who doesn't vote is being counted as a yes? It is expected that many will either miss the ballot question or decide it's too complex and just desiring the status quo, not enter a vote. So in that sense, a non-vote favors the yes crowd. ETA: before I get flogged I vote conservative. |
|
[#17]
Quoted:
It's not quite true, but a reduction on the number of supporters necessary to make it pass. For example, let's say there are 100 voters, 26 vote "yes," 24 vote "no," and 50 don't vote... that means the measure passes even though only 26% of the population are actually in support of "yes." It is expected that many will either miss the ballot question or decide it's too complex and just desiring the status quo, not enter a vote. So in that sense, a non-vote favors the yes crowd. View Quote As you said, it's expected that many people will miss it (since they are apparently planning on putting the question on the back of the ballot) I am by no means an expert in the subject, just parroting back what I have read and heard...I still don't know how this can possibly be legal, but as I said I'm hearing it from more than one source and people I talk to are hearing the same... |
|
[#18]
Quoted:
this is not my understanding at all, I have read in various places online (if it's on the internet it must be true ) and have also heard on an AM Radio show that if for example 35 vote "yes", 40 vote "no", and the remaining 25 do not vote for or against but instead leave it blank, that those 25 are counted as a "yes" bringing the official tally to 60 "yes" vs. 40 "no"...if voters stay home and abstain completely nothing is then counted As you said, it's expected that many people will miss it (since they are apparently planning on putting the question on the back of the ballot) I am by no means an expert in the subject, just parroting back what I have read and heard...I still don't know how this can possibly be legal, but as I said I'm hearing it from more than one source and people I talk to are hearing the same... View Quote |
|
[#19]
View Quote |
|
[#20]
View Quote and just for the record, FaceBook was not one of my sources, haha... ARFCOM is as close to social media as I get, aside from following various newsfeeds on Twitter |
|
[#21]
I'm seeing a lot of public union employees freaking out over this & telling everyone to vote no - so I'm thinking the correct vote is yes...
|
|
[#22]
|
|
[#23]
Quoted:
I am standing by my earlier statement on the matter. If Cumhole wants it, it can't be good for taxpaying New Yorkers. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
[#24]
I have been beating the drum on the pension issue for along time along with the stability of the state finances.
|
|
[#25]
Quoted:
I'm seeing a lot of public union employees freaking out over this & telling everyone to vote no - so I'm thinking the correct vote is yes... View Quote Anything the unions are vehemently opposed is exceedingly likely to be better for taxpayers. Attached File |
|
[#26]
Quoted:
This. Anything the unions are vehemently opposed is exceedingly likely to be better for taxpayers.https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/176224/Union-cartoon1-316090.JPG View Quote |
|
[#27]
Quoted:
But that changes when Coumo is in the equation. So.... given the choice, I'm siding AGAINST Coumo, as we all should. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
This. Anything the unions are vehemently opposed is exceedingly likely to be better for taxpayers.https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/176224/Union-cartoon1-316090.JPG |
|
[#28]
If Prince Andy (aka Cumhole)
Wants this, somehow someway we (NY Gun enthusiasts) are going to get Fucked, Guaranteed! |
|
[#29]
|
|
[#30]
|
|
[#31]
Quoted:
Let's put it this way, Cuomo wants every blank vote to count as a yes... THAT is how bad he wants this. Anything he wants that badly cannot be good for us! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
[#33]
|
|
[#34]
I went to one of the sessions on the Con con and came away thinking NO! The last one they had in the late 60's was a cluster **** and this one would be infinatley worse I'm afraid because politicians can double dip as a representitive!
|
|
[#35]
I believe the Teamster vote is the source of the failure to vote = yes vote rumors. Different animal:
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/retired-new-york-teamsters-pension-payouts-shrink-30-article-1.3494073 |
|
[#36]
Quoted:
Cuomo wants it, that's all I need to know. NO View Quote Como announces support for it, = The right will vote against it Start talking about Public Employees Pensions = The Unions will vote against it Wonder if it's not all fear mongering to prevent measures that could affect real change, such as term limits, and recall provisions. |
|
[#37]
Quoted:
I wonder if that's not half the ploy. Como announces support for it, = The right will vote against it Start talking about Public Employees Pensions = The Unions will vote against it Wonder if it's not all fear mongering to prevent measures that could affect real change, such as term limits, and recall provisions. View Quote |
|
[#38]
Quoted:
Makes sense. In all reality, how much worse could it be? Maybe upstate would have a voice and become more autonomous. View Quote |
|
[#39]
I'm tempted to vote "Yes" because of all the "Vote No" stickers and signs I see and it's like the fucking liberals are telling me how to think again. Then again, Herr Cuomo says vote yes, so what do I do? Probably vote yes, just because there will never be positive change in this state otherwise, and even if things get worse, maybe it will hasten the circling of the drain until enough people get fed up and leave. Let's face it, the ONLY way this state will ever improve is if NYC is cut off from the rest of the state. It's an incredible longshot but what else are you going to do.
|
|
[#40]
Quoted:
I'm tempted to vote "Yes" because of all the "Vote No" stickers and signs I see and it's like the fucking liberals are telling me how to think again. Then again, Herr Cuomo says vote yes, so what do I do? Probably vote yes, just because there will never be positive change in this state otherwise, and even if things get worse, maybe it will hasten the circling of the drain until enough people get fed up and leave. Let's face it, the ONLY way this state will ever improve is if NYC is cut off from the rest of the state. It's an incredible longshot but what else are you going to do. View Quote |
|
[#41]
Quoted:
I'm tempted to vote "Yes" because of all the "Vote No" stickers and signs I see and it's like the fucking liberals are telling me how to think again. Then again, Herr Cuomo says vote yes, so what do I do? Probably vote yes, just because there will never be positive change in this state otherwise, and even if things get worse, maybe it will hasten the circling of the drain until enough people get fed up and leave. Let's face it, the ONLY way this state will ever improve is if NYC is cut off from the rest of the state. It's an incredible longshot but what else are you going to do. View Quote NOTHING GOOD can come of this. NOTHING. As to the rest of your post, I respectfully suggest that thought process is akin to cutting off your own dick as a birth control measure. |
|
[#42]
Quoted:
I'm voting yes. As noted, the ones opposing so far give me hope it is a good thing. Regardless, no matter what they come up with, the people still have to vote on the work product. If they create an unpalatable set of changes they can be voted down. View Quote |
|
[#43]
Quoted:
Bingo, lets burn this mother down... Pensions for convicted criminals and pederasts, and Albany corruption... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm voting yes. As noted, the ones opposing so far give me hope it is a good thing. Regardless, no matter what they come up with, the people still have to vote on the work product. If they create an unpalatable set of changes they can be voted down. |
|
[#44]
Quoted:
I pay enough taxes. State and Fed already get 40% of my fucking check. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm voting yes. As noted, the ones opposing so far give me hope it is a good thing. Regardless, no matter what they come up with, the people still have to vote on the work product. If they create an unpalatable set of changes they can be voted down. On a side note dont worry under the current gop tax plan you'll pay more... As you know, residents of states with income taxes are going to take it in the ass under the current Republican plan.... And they will exoand the deficit because they are good small government conservatives. |
|
[#45]
|
|
[#46]
|
|
[#47]
|
|
[#48]
Quoted:
I wonder if that's not half the ploy. Como announces support for it, = The right will vote against it Start talking about Public Employees Pensions = The Unions will vote against it Wonder if it's not all fear mongering to prevent measures that could affect real change, such as term limits, and recall provisions. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Cuomo wants it, that's all I need to know. NO Como announces support for it, = The right will vote against it Start talking about Public Employees Pensions = The Unions will vote against it Wonder if it's not all fear mongering to prevent measures that could affect real change, such as term limits, and recall provisions. |
|
[#49]
Quoted:
I'm tempted to vote "Yes" because of all the "Vote No" stickers and signs I see and it's like the fucking liberals are telling me how to think again. Then again, Herr Cuomo says vote yes, so what do I do? Probably vote yes, just because there will never be positive change in this state otherwise, and even if things get worse, maybe it will hasten the circling of the drain until enough people get fed up and leave. Let's face it, the ONLY way this state will ever improve is if NYC is cut off from the rest of the state. It's an incredible longshot but what else are you going to do. View Quote |
|
[#50]
consider the pension fund is opened up like a piggy bank,, like cuomo has been jerking off over. raids the pension fund, then taxes get jacked even higher to cover the liability. smart move idiots.
ontop of that.. that huge sum of money starts rolling through liberal hands, they will be giving out free fucking everything to every scumbag in the state. free herion, meth clinics on every corner... every stupid, unimaginable social service program just got funded for DECADES. and think of the new shit they'll think of to spend that cash on... un real. while fireman and police, guys who worked for their pensions get fucked. (understandably, the majority of you guys, this is nightly wet dream for you) - the pension system is solvent and sustainable. police and fire is overfunded at this point, due to proper money handling by a somewhat competent comptroller, and newly installed tiers that require increased member contributions to help shave the cost. this is just 1 single dot on the scope of what they could royally fuck up in this thing is opened up. with the unmeasurable amount of corruption within this states political machine, i couldn't imagine a con con working out in ANYONES favor, let alone blue collar and/or gun owners. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.