Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Posted: 2/3/2006 8:24:48 PM EDT

folks,
see any problem with a lower marked as follows...



re:
ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=3&f=118&t=247446
and
www.globaltactical.com/axami/shop.php?grd=292&prd=293

thanks,
ar-jedi

Link Posted: 2/3/2006 9:10:09 PM EDT


It says AR15.......so I wouldn't take the chance
Link Posted: 2/4/2006 12:58:41 AM EDT

Originally Posted By DWFAN:

It says AR15.......so I wouldn't take the chance



I would agree.
Link Posted: 2/4/2006 4:07:47 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 2/4/2006 4:08:30 AM EDT by PK90]
IMO, this is not a "Colt AR-15 and CAR-15 series" as described in NJS 2C:39-1w. Shouldn't be a problem. No different than a Fulton Armory FAR-15 or Rock River Arms LAR-15.

You could call the NJSP Firearms Unit @ 609-882-2000, or better yet write a letter, and tell them it is a model "GT-AR15" made by Stag Arms and will be built in Post-Ban configuration to comply with the substantially identical clause of the Assault Weapon Ban.
Link Posted: 2/4/2006 5:56:15 AM EDT
It's not a Colt.....hence not the named Colt AR15 that is banned
Link Posted: 2/4/2006 11:37:57 AM EDT

Originally Posted By PK90:
IMO, this is not a "Colt AR-15 and CAR-15 series" as described in NJS 2C:39-1w. Shouldn't be a problem. No different than a Fulton Armory FAR-15 or Rock River Arms LAR-15.

You could call the NJSP Firearms Unit @ 609-882-2000, or better yet write a letter, and tell them it is a model "GT-AR15" made by Stag Arms and will be built in Post-Ban configuration to comply with the substantially identical clause of the Assault Weapon Ban.



There you go again with logic

Technically, I agree fully with PK90, I just wouldn't take the chance. Especially when you can get other lowers and not have to worry about it.
Link Posted: 2/5/2006 3:04:37 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 2/5/2006 3:28:48 PM EDT by Accuracy_With_Volume]
I can't see how GT-AR15 = Colt AR-15 and CAR-15 series. As long as the firearm does not have more than two evil features, it is not substantially identical to the banned firearm. A manufacturers model name simply does not make a firearm substantially identical the banned firearm. The AG makes it very clear that "substantially identical" is refering to functionality.
Please take a look at the guidlines the AG has set for the definition of "substantially identical."

www.state.nj.us/lps/dcj/agguide/assltf.htm


Quote directly from the letter:

"A semi-automatic firearm should be considered to be "substantially identical," that is, identical in all material respects, to a named assault weapon if it meets the below listed criteria:

A. semi-automatic rifle that has the ability to accept a detachable magazine and has at least 2 of the following:

a folding or telescoping stock;
a pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon;
a bayonet mount;
a flash suppressor or threaded barrel designed to accommodate a flash suppressor; and
a grenade launcher"


Having a model name of GT-AR15 does not meet the criteria to make it a banned assault weapon.
Top Top