Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Posted: 6/13/2003 10:40:33 AM EDT
17 today
Link Posted: 6/13/2003 10:42:37 AM EDT

Originally Posted By hound:
17 today



Oh. I thought you talk about our DFW crew Mary Kate and Ashley. My bad.
Link Posted: 6/13/2003 10:47:31 AM EDT
That's why it is posted here........
Link Posted: 6/13/2003 10:53:17 AM EDT
YES! only one year to go. What I am talking about.

I'd hit it
Link Posted: 6/13/2003 10:58:43 AM EDT
Those two russian girls are old enough...I would mention the name but this thread would get locked.......Weasels!!!!!
Link Posted: 6/13/2003 11:19:33 AM EDT
he he.... Ill have to see what those ladies are doin in a year...

yeah right..

What am I doing in this forum?

eek! wheres my beer?
Link Posted: 6/13/2003 11:29:58 AM EDT
mahabali go get a coors and get out of texas...no shiner for you....
Link Posted: 6/13/2003 11:32:02 AM EDT
The Hun is taking them out for ice cream.

Link Posted: 6/13/2003 12:00:33 PM EDT
Holy frijoles! Those are the Full House twins? I never realized they turned out so well.
Link Posted: 6/13/2003 1:25:12 PM EDT
actually, that's a photoshop of A twin, mirrored on the other side. They're not THAT identical (and mirrored!) IRL.
Link Posted: 6/13/2003 1:51:16 PM EDT

Originally Posted By steenkybastage:
actually, that's a photoshop of A twin, mirrored on the other side. They're not THAT identical (and mirrored!) IRL.



your a huge geek.
Link Posted: 6/13/2003 1:58:43 PM EDT


The gals in question.
Link Posted: 6/13/2003 2:06:32 PM EDT

Originally Posted By LotBoy:
photos.ar15.com/ImageGallery/IG_LoadImage.asp?iImageUnq=5847

The gals in question.



The best dinner pic I've seen in a long time!
Link Posted: 6/13/2003 2:08:01 PM EDT

Originally Posted By Boomholzer:

Originally Posted By steenkybastage:
actually, that's a photoshop of A twin, mirrored on the other side. They're not THAT identical (and mirrored!) IRL.



your a huge geek.





Which explains the crappy photoshop job? You're only a wannabe geek?
Link Posted: 6/13/2003 2:12:49 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 6/13/2003 2:15:45 PM EDT by Boomholzer]
My GF said that MK&A have implants. Can anyone confirm or deny? Any first-hand experience?


I know my photoshops are crude n sucky. That is the power if MS Paint!
Link Posted: 6/13/2003 2:13:21 PM EDT

Originally Posted By LotBoy:
The gals in question.



Wow! It's been a while since Full House, eh?
Link Posted: 6/13/2003 6:58:14 PM EDT
"First hand". hehe

No tattoos' ?

No boyfriend in a grunge band ?

Never been arrested ?

Dammm.
Link Posted: 6/13/2003 7:05:03 PM EDT
Although a pistol is illegal for me in New York State, M + K are quite legal as the age of consent is 17.
Link Posted: 6/13/2003 7:10:02 PM EDT
OH MY GOD......I can't breathe.


-REAPER2502
Link Posted: 6/13/2003 8:00:43 PM EDT
7 of 9 is much hotter
Link Posted: 6/13/2003 8:42:56 PM EDT
17 is legal baby in TX!!!
Link Posted: 6/13/2003 9:09:09 PM EDT

Originally Posted By Citabria7GCBC:
7 of 9 is much hotter



Here you go Citabria7GCBC


Link Posted: 6/13/2003 9:09:31 PM EDT

Originally Posted By jadams951:
17 is legal baby in TX!!!



WRONG. Aren't you a cop? If so, shouldn't you know the laws that you enforce? damn.

18 is the legal limit in the State of Texas. If it went to trial, and she was under 18, and if she's 14+, and you can prove she's permiscuous, and if the judge allows such evidence, then 17 would be legal under these circumstances.
Link Posted: 6/13/2003 9:34:32 PM EDT

Originally Posted By Energizer:

Originally Posted By jadams951:
17 is legal baby in TX!!!



WRONG. Aren't you a cop? If so, shouldn't you know the laws that you enforce? damn.

18 is the legal limit in the State of Texas. If it went to trial, and she was under 18, and if she's 14+, and you can prove she's permiscuous, and if the judge allows such evidence, then 17 would be legal under these circumstances.



has this changed ???

I KNOW in 1987 the age of consent was 17
Link Posted: 6/13/2003 10:19:20 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 6/13/2003 10:21:04 PM EDT by lordtrader]
Link Posted: 6/13/2003 10:31:23 PM EDT
Link Posted: 6/13/2003 10:48:56 PM EDT

Originally Posted By TREETOP:
17, 18, illegal, legal, Texas, New York, whatever.


together, 17+17=34.
34=Legal.



now that's an equation I can understand
Link Posted: 6/13/2003 11:14:42 PM EDT

Originally Posted By TREETOP:
17, 18, illegal, legal, Texas, New York, whatever.

together, 17+17=34.
34=Legal.



Nice!!! Peach-fuzzy Logic.


CHRIS
Link Posted: 6/13/2003 11:29:19 PM EDT
They are only twelve days younger than me. They were always legal for me!
Link Posted: 6/14/2003 12:13:53 AM EDT
the question is.....would it be sick if they made lesbian porn together?
Link Posted: 6/14/2003 6:24:20 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Energizer:

Originally Posted By jadams951:
17 is legal baby in TX!!!



WRONG. Aren't you a cop? If so, shouldn't you know the laws that you enforce? damn.

18 is the legal limit in the State of Texas. If it went to trial, and she was under 18, and if she's 14+, and you can prove she's permiscuous, and if the judge allows such evidence, then 17 would be legal under these circumstances.



I'm right dude!
Link Posted: 6/14/2003 12:21:04 PM EDT
You ppl know your statutory laws real well.

I'll just play it safe and look for women on the other side of 20.
Link Posted: 6/14/2003 12:38:38 PM EDT
If they are implants they did them in a tasteful size. Just right for their frame.

Don't forget, they are multi multi multi millionaires.

Bob
Link Posted: 6/14/2003 6:49:34 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 6/14/2003 6:56:18 PM EDT by SuperAlpha]
Explain this:



§ 22.011. Sexual Assault

(a) A person commits an offense if the person:

(1) intentionally or knowingly:

(A) causes the penetration of the anus or female sexual organ of another person by any means, without that person's consent;

(B) causes the penetration of the mouth of another person by the sexual organ of the actor, without that person's consent; or

(C) causes the sexual organ of another person, without that person's consent, to contact or penetrate the mouth, anus, or sexual organ of another person, including the actor; or

(2) intentionally or knowingly:

(A) causes the penetration of the anus or female sexual organ of a child by any means;

(B) causes the penetration of the mouth of a child by the sexual organ of the actor;

(C) causes the sexual organ of a child to contact or penetrate the mouth, anus, or sexual organ of another person, including the actor;

(D) causes the anus of a child to contact the mouth, anus, or sexual organ of another person, including the actor; or

(E) causes the mouth of a child to contact the anus or sexual organ of another person, including the actor.

(b) A sexual assault under Subsection (a)(1) is without the consent of the other person if:

(1) the actor compels the other person to submit or participate by the use of physical force or violence;

(2) the actor compels the other person to submit or participate by threatening to use force or violence against the other person, and the other person believes that the actor has the present ability to execute the threat;

(3) the other person has not consented and the actor knows the other person is unconscious or physically unable to resist;

(4) the actor knows that as a result of mental disease or defect the other person is at the time of the sexual assault incapable either of appraising the nature of the act or of resisting it;

(5) the other person has not consented and the actor knows the other person is unaware that the sexual assault is occurring;

(6) the actor has intentionally impaired the other person's power to appraise or control the other person's conduct by administering any substance without the other person's knowledge;

(7) the actor compels the other person to submit or participate by threatening to use force or violence against any person, and the other person believes that the actor has the ability to execute the threat;

(8) the actor is a public servant who coerces the other person to submit or participate;

(9) the actor is a mental health services provider or a health care services provider who causes the other person, who is a patient or former patient of the actor, to submit or participate by exploiting the other person's emotional dependency on the actor; or

(10) the actor is a clergyman who causes the other person to submit or participate by exploiting the other person's emotional dependency on the clergyman in the clergyman's professional character as spiritual adviser.

(c) In this section:

(1) "Child" means a person younger than 17 years of age who is not the spouse of the actor.

(2) "Spouse" means a person who is legally married to another.

(3) "Health care services provider" means:

(A) a physician licensed under Subtitle B, Title 3, Occupations Code;

(B) a chiropractor licensed under Chapter 201, Occupations Code;

(C) a licensed vocational nurse licensed under Chapter 302, Occupations Code;

(D) a physical therapist licensed under Chapter 453, Occupations Code;

(E) a physician assistant licensed under Chapter 204, Occupations Code; or

(F) a registered nurse or an advanced practice nurse licensed under Chapter 301, Occupations Code.

(4) "Mental health services provider" means an individual, licensed or unlicensed, who performs or purports to perform mental health services, including a:

(A) licensed social worker as defined by Section 505.002, Occupations Code;

(B) chemical dependency counselor as defined by Section 504.001, Occupations Code;

(C) licensed professional counselor as defined by Section 503.002, Occupations Code;

(D) licensed marriage and family therapist as defined by Section 502.002, Occupations Code;

(E) member of the clergy;

(F) psychologist offering psychological services as defined by Section 501.003, Occupations Code; or

(G) special officer for mental health assignment certified under Section 1701.404, Occupations Code.

(d) It is a defense to prosecution under Subsection (a)(2) that the conduct consisted of medical care for the child and did not include any contact between the anus or sexual organ of the child and the mouth, anus, or sexual organ of the actor or a third party.

(e) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under Subsection (a)(2) that:

(1) the actor was not more than three years older than the victim and at the time of the offense:

(A) was not required under Chapter 62, Code of Criminal Procedure, as added by Chapter 668, Acts of the 75th Legislature, Regular Session, 1997, to register for life as a sex offender; or

(B) was not a person who under Chapter 62 had a reportable conviction or adjudication for an offense under this section; and

(2) the victim was a child of 14 years of age or older.

(f) An offense under this section is a felony of the second degree.

Link Posted: 6/14/2003 6:50:10 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 6/14/2003 8:18:59 PM EDT by SuperAlpha]
and this: (porn law)



§ 43.25. Sexual Performance by a Child

(a) In this section:

(1) "Sexual performance" means any performance or part thereof that includes sexual conduct by a child younger than 18 years of age.

(2) "Sexual conduct" means actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sado-masochistic abuse, or lewd exhibition of the genitals, the anus, or any portion of the female breast below the top of the areola.

(3) "Performance" means any play, motion picture, photograph, dance, or other visual representation that can be exhibited before an audience of one or more persons.

(4) "Produce" with respect to a sexual performance includes any conduct that directly contributes to the creation or manufacture of the sexual performance.

(5) "Promote" means to procure, manufacture, issue, sell, give, provide, lend, mail, deliver, transfer, transmit, publish, distribute, circulate, disseminate, present, exhibit, or advertise or to offer or agree to do any of the above.

(6) "Simulated" means the explicit depiction of sexual conduct that creates the appearance of actual sexual conduct and during which a person engaging in the conduct exhibits any uncovered portion of the breasts, genitals, or buttocks.

(7) "Deviate sexual intercourse" has the meaning defined by Section 43.01.

(b) A person commits an offense if, knowing the character and content thereof, he employs, authorizes, or induces a child younger than 18 years of age to engage in sexual conduct or a sexual performance. A parent or legal guardian or custodian of a child younger than 18 years of age commits an offense if he consents to the participation by the child in a sexual performance.

(c) An offense under Subsection (b) is a felony of the second degree.

(d) A person commits an offense if, knowing the character and content of the material, he produces, directs, or promotes a performance that includes sexual conduct by a child younger than 18 years of age.

(e) An offense under Subsection (d) is a felony of the third degree.

(f) It is an affirmative defense to a prosecution under this section that:

(1) the defendant, in good faith, reasonably believed that the child who engaged in the sexual conduct was 18 years of age or older;

(2) the defendant was the spouse of the child at the time of the offense;

(3) the conduct was for a bona fide educational, medical, psychological, psychiatric, judicial, law enforcement, or legislative purpose; or

(4) the defendant is not more than two years older than the child.

(g) When it becomes necessary for the purposes of this section or Section 43.26 to determine whether a child who participated in sexual conduct was younger than 18 years of age, the court or jury may make this determination by any of the following methods:

(1) personal inspection of the child;

(2) inspection of the photograph or motion picture that shows the child engaging in the sexual performance;

(3) oral testimony by a witness to the sexual performance as to the age of the child based on the child's appearance at the time;

(4) expert medical testimony based on the appearance of the child engaging in the sexual performance; or

(5) any other method authorized by law or by the rules of evidence at common law.




So as long as you do not take pics, make home movies, etc, you are okay with 17, otherwise it is 18? (since you would be the actor in this case)
Link Posted: 6/14/2003 6:57:27 PM EDT
In Ohio 16 is legal. Those are some fine looking twins
Link Posted: 6/14/2003 7:05:16 PM EDT
Link Posted: 6/26/2003 11:07:25 AM EDT
17 is legal in TX???? NOPE!!!!!!!!!

Tell it to the guy in my home town who just recieved a 30 year vacation last week for sex with a minor. The defense tried to show her (the victim) as premiscuous (sp), but the judge ruled the evidence inadmissable.

30 years of being sombodys bitch........hope it was worth it.

JH94
Link Posted: 6/26/2003 11:58:21 AM EDT
See above TX laws.
17 is legal in Texas as long as it is not "performance by child."
Link Posted: 6/26/2003 1:20:35 PM EDT

Originally Posted By JarHead94:
17 is legal in TX???? NOPE!!!!!!!!!

Tell it to the guy in my home town who just recieved a 30 year vacation last week for sex with a minor. The defense tried to show her (the victim) as premiscuous (sp), but the judge ruled the evidence inadmissable.



Exactly what I have been saying all along. The judge does not have to allow the evidence.
Link Posted: 6/26/2003 6:42:08 PM EDT
IBTL
Link Posted: 6/27/2003 12:43:57 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 6/27/2003 12:44:50 PM EDT by ProfessorEvil]
I bagged Twins Lesbians?

Link Posted: 6/27/2003 12:54:15 PM EDT
16 is legal in Nevada too
Link Posted: 6/28/2003 4:35:47 AM EDT
I just watched a show about the twins on VH1 called driven, they said they sold 1.6 billion worth of Mary Kate and Ashley goods!!

Ropes
Link Posted: 6/28/2003 12:52:52 PM EDT

Originally Posted By JarHead94:
17 is legal in TX???? NOPE!!!!!!!!!

Tell it to the guy in my home town who just recieved a 30 year vacation last week for sex with a minor. The defense tried to show her (the victim) as premiscuous (sp), but the judge ruled the evidence inadmissable.

30 years of being sombodys bitch........hope it was worth it.

JH94



Was she 17 or younger?

TS
Link Posted: 6/28/2003 1:13:32 PM EDT

Originally Posted By MDC85:
the question is.....would it be sick if they made lesbian porn together?



Is that a trick question?

That would be sooooooo f'in sweet
Link Posted: 6/28/2003 1:48:27 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 6/28/2003 1:48:59 PM EDT by NAM]
Link Posted: 6/28/2003 2:43:46 PM EDT

Originally Posted By NAM:
www.ageofconsent.com/ageofconsent.htm



What's with the 14/16 or 16/18 stuff?

TS
Top Top