When I viewed the WNEM interview with the owner of Bare's immediately following the robbery, it was stated that they were going to consider upgrading their security systems. That's good, if not timely....
Gordie, I'm sure that the major franchise firearm retailers you mentioned have the financial means to afford top grade security systems. As for the other 90% of firearms dealers: if one's business is the sale of weapons, then one should take measures to ensure their security: whether that means spending significant funds for a top notch security system, or having a less extensive alarm system and thus at the end of the business day taking the time to store firearms in safes. (BTW: the local FFL I mentioned earlier not only removes his weapons to safes, but also has a hi-tech security system in place.)
As regarding my remark about Bare's having a good insurance carrier: In this society where if someone illegally enters/invades my home, I fear for my life, and thus utilize deadly force to quell the threat to my family - it is common practice for the deceased perpetrator's family to file litigation and seek damages. (It's a sad commentary as to the state of not only the legal system to allow such activities, but also indicative of societal degeneration as a whole where the notion of personal responsibility largely has gone by the way.) So, Gordie - I guess I look at it this way: there are a lot of lawyers in this world that would likely consider filing suit against a small time FFL if their client's family suffered a loss from a stolen weapon - IF it could be proven that the store owner had failed to adequately provide the necessary level of security to safeguard their merchandise.
Gordie, I may be too cynical. But I've experienced people at their worst when money, legalities, and greed come into play.
Again, .02 -