There was a letter signed by then head of SLFU , Lt. Robert Kiehm stating directly that the .223 and 5.45 versions of "AK clones" (in otherwise post ban configuration) were legal .
Remember, there is no legal justification, whatsoever as to what constitutes an "AK TYPE". It isn't defined by STATUTE, anywhere. It's all subjective and open to interpretation.
Right now, that interpretation is a gun that uses AK mags and resembles an AK in appearance and has other parts that interchange with an AK (such as bolt, bolt carrier, etc.) and is chambered for 7.62x39.
For over eight years since the original 1993 ban and prior to May 8, 2002 - the interpretation as ruled on by the CT State Supreme Court in 1995 - held that the rifle had to have "AK-47 AVTOMAT" on the receiver. For eight years, CT State Police SLFU told dealers at seminars those guns were legal
one fine day in Bantam, CT ............... they weren't.
The State has refused to even hear the case CCS prepared and basically told us to stick it up our asses and if we bitched anymore, they would add MORE guns to the list
Tomorrow, that interpretation could mean any semi auto from an M-1 Garand to a Remington 1100