Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Posted: 9/28/2003 9:21:29 AM EDT
I informed here that it is now safe to vote for progun bill that go in front of the senate. Also included the World Net Daily page that has the story. I know that she is a rubber stamp Democrat but we can try.



WEAPONS OF CHOICE
Daschle supports pro-gun bill
Measure bans lawsuits against firearms industry

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: September 27, 2003
1:00 a.m. Eastern



© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com


The Senate's top Democrat has broken ranks with most of his party's constituents and has agreed to support legislation banning potentially ruinous lawsuits against the firearms industry.



Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D.

"The vast majority of gun owners, manufacturers and sellers are honest and law-abiding," said Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle of South Dakota, according to the Sioux Falls Argus Leader. "It is wrong – and it is a misuse of the civil-justice system – to try to punish honest, law-abiding people for illegal acts committed by others without their knowledge or involvement. That's not the way we do things in America."

The legislation, which is backed by the National Rifle Association, the nation's largest gun-rights group, blocks most lawsuits against the gun industry.

However, the bill would allow suits against gun manufacturers and dealers who illegally sold firearms to persons who were not qualified to own them. Also, the legislation permits suits against companies who manufacture defective weapons.

Gun-control advocates have backed a series of lawsuits filed against the industry by numerous cities and municipalities over the past few years. The suits generally claim gun makers should be held liable for criminal misuse of their products and should be made to compensate cities financially for funds spent on treating victims of armed criminal action. So far, however, cities have failed to convince the courts.

As WorldNetDaily reported, the House in April passed a version of legislation banning gun-industry suits. Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., and chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, also chastised the use of the court system to punish gun makers.

"We shouldn't use the judicial process to bankrupt an industry that makes a legal product," he said, adding gun-control groups were using the court system to push a "back door" political agenda.

Gun-control groups have said they wanted to impose financial hardships on gun makers by taking them to court and forcing them to spend tens of thousands of dollars defending their products.

So far, one company – Navegar Inc. – has declared bankruptcy, though lawsuits brought against the company in California failed to find it negligent in a 1993 San Francisco multiple homicide.

The White House has said it supports the legislation. The administration believes it will "prevent abuse of the legal system and help curb the growing problem of frivolous lawsuits," according to a statement.

Some Republicans, mindful that Daschle is up for re-election next year, believe his decision is based more on politics than on ideology.

"Tom Daschle is clearly having what is known as an election year conversion," Republican National Committee spokeswoman Christine Iverson told the Argus Leader.

The minority leader is most frequently a champion of gun-control legislation. Over the years he has supported legislation backed by the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence about 80 percent of the time, the paper said.

Aides, however, denied politics was involved, telling the Argus Leader their boss – who is an avid hunter – was making a principled decision.

"[The bill] is the model of what we tried to accomplish, which is working for a bipartisan compromise that works," Daschle spokesman Dan Pfeiffer told the paper.

Nine other Senate Democrats have signed on to co-sponsor the bill. So far, it has 55 co-sponsors, five shy of the 60 needed to become filibuster-proof by opponents.

Link Posted: 10/3/2003 10:07:54 AM EDT
Good job WaMag!!!!
I'll bet a box of .223 that you get an email form letter back stating something like-

"" Thank you for contacting me over the Internet. I appreciate your comments
and welcome the opportunity to respond.

If you did not include your postal address please send a copy of your full
message with your address included so I can respond to your postal
address.

Due to the amount of mail I receive, I can not reply to all messages. If
you are from outside the 8th Congressional District, I will forward your
message to your congressman/woman. Also, please take a moment to visit my
website at ... to find my latest press releases,
op-eds, and event information. To sign-up for our Electronic Newsletter,
you may subscribe at .....

Thank you again for sharing your thoughts with me. If there is anything
else I can do for you, please do not hesitate to contact me again. ""

Typically what I get in responce from emails, and I might add I do send out a lot and this type of reply is mostly from the Dem's.

Good job though, all we can do is keep hammering away!

Prospector
Link Posted: 10/6/2003 9:07:33 PM EDT

Aides, however, denied politics was involved, telling the Argus Leader their boss – who is an avid hunter – was making a principled decision.



What does hunting have to do w/ the 2nd????

Principled decision.... where is my BS life vest...
Top Top