I went to the range today, and zeroed the ACOG (TA01B),
that I had mounted on my FAL.
I mounted this optic using the LaRue Tactical QD mount,
and the DSA scope mount for the FAL.
The ammunition was South African surplus purchased from
Aim Surplus. The lot numbers were as pictured below.
All shooting was done at 100yds, from a bench for initial
zero.
The first group that I fired was just off the target and
measured 1-1/4" C to C. It is pictured below.
This group was way to the right, but elevation was almost
perfect. I then proceded to bring the POI left.
This next target shows that progression.
The group next to the orange dot was the last one I fired
before I switched targets, due to the fact that there were
so many holes I couldn't tell which were which in my spotting scope.
The largest group that I fired was 2" C to C, and the
smallest was 1" C to C.
That is an average of 1.5 MOA.
This I believe is proof enough that the FAL is a lot more
accurate than an average of 2-3 MOA that most claim.
The final target pictured here is my last group and some
other offhand shooting that I did after the initial zero was
done. The final group was the 2 rounds touching and the
one on the other side of the orange dot.
Those 3 rounds measure 1-1/4" C to C.
Not bolt-gun sniper grade accurate, but plenty good enough
for a battle rifle thrust into the Designated Marksman role.
You will notice however that one group I fired measures
2-1/2". That group was fired with FNM Portugese surplus.
This is normally very accurate ammunition. This lot however,
is not. I did not fire anymore of this ammunition after that group.
That being said,
The FAL is a very accurate and capable rifle.
I urge anyone looking for a battle rifle, to give the FAL some
serious consideration.
Sources,
www.dsarms.comwww.riflescopes.comwww.laruetactical.comwww.aimsurplus.comRegards,
Scott