User Panel
|
In my opinion, 99% of trifecta issues are with users. I've been running 5.56 Sakers with Trifecta mounts for 4 years. Never once had an issue with the suppressor coming off the mount. One Saker has 10k rounds thru it. Most folks don't take the time to learn the dynamics of the mount.
First of all, as with all taper based mounts, lubricate the contact surfaces of the mount and suppressor with an anti-carbon fouling lubricant before assembly. I use Kelllube. A typical range session for me is between 200 and 300 rounds. When done, I remove the suppressor while the unit is still warm and don't let the carbon solidify over a few days before removing. I clean both the mount and suppressor contact surfaces before using again. With the trifecta mount, it's very important that securing mechanism lugs are fully disengaged before attempting to mount the suppressor and we'll as when unmounting (as clearly detailed in the instructions). When mounting, tighten the securing ring until it stops, don't over-tighten as that could create issues once carbon is introduced. YMMV |
|
Did they grab my pic?
|
|
Quoted:
In my opinion, 99% of trifecta issues are with users. I've been running 5.56 Sakers with Trifecta mounts for 4 years. Never once had an issue with the suppressor coming off the mount. One Saker has 10k rounds thru it. Most folks don't take the time to learn the dynamics of the mount. First of all, as with all taper based mounts, lubricate the contact surfaces of the mount and suppressor with an anti-carbon fouling lubricant before assembly. I use Kelllube. A typical range session for me is between 200 and 300 rounds. When done, I remove the suppressor while the unit is still warm and don't let the carbon solidify over a few days before removing. I clean both the mount and suppressor contact surfaces before using again. With the trifecta mount, it's very important that securing mechanism lugs are fully disengaged before attempting to mount the suppressor and we'll as when unmounting (as clearly detailed in the instructions). When mounting, tighten the securing ring until it stops, don't over-tighten as that could create issues once carbon is introduced. YMMV View Quote |
|
Quoted: Either I’m stupid or this is a widespread problem that three companies have addressed with aftermarket solutions. View Quote I'm not even defending trifecta. imho, it's a problem prone mounting system. Which is why Silencerco dumped it and upgrades people for free (mount AND muzzle devices which is amazing CS) to ASR, which is a far better system. |
|
Quoted: Not saying you're stupid. But referencing other companies making "aftermarket solutions" is silly. Silencerco makes mounts for AAC, YHM, etc. It's not an aftermarket solution for problems with other company's suppressors or mounts. It's a self serving way of making your product available to a wider audience. The Key-Mo wasn't made from benevolence to solve an issue with a Silencerco suppressor. It was made so people with Silencerco suppressors could purchase their mount, muzzle devices, and suppressors without having to start from scratch. Silencerco making their suppressors modular on the mounting and able to accept third party mounts to begin with was pretty nice. A lot of companies weld their shit on whether you like it or not. You can't change a Sandman or a Q suppressor to a YHM, AAC, or Silencerco mount. I'm not even defending trifecta. imho, it's a problem prone mounting system. Which is why Silencerco dumped it and upgrades people for free (mount AND muzzle devices which is amazing CS) to ASR, which is a far better system. View Quote |
|
If i'm not mistaken, the developer of KeyMo is the same engineer that developed trifecta, and he made KeyMo at the new company after being fired by Silencerco. Of course an engineer that develops a product and then sees the failings in it a few years later is going to develop a product that refines and corrects that issue.
I disagree that those solutions wouldn't be on the market if trifecta didn't suck. They would be anyway, because its an excellent way of attracting new customers from people who already own a competing company's suppressor. It's easy to slap some threads on their mount and boom, they have a road into a new market. It's the exact same reason Silencerco made their suppressor able to accept all the mounts to begin with. Not because every other company's suppressors "sucked", but because by allowing AAC or YHM mounts and the like, people that owned stuff from those companies would be attracted to buying a Silencerco suppressor with compatible mounting solutions. |
|
Dude, that sucks. When I got my Saker, I immediately switched it for the AAC 51t mount since I already had AAC muzzle devices and an AAC can.
If anyone wants it, I have an unused .30 cal Trifecta 5/8x24 brake and Saker base and will let it go cheap or trade. Duane |
|
|
Quoted:
If i'm not mistaken, the developer of KeyMo is the same engineer that developed trifecta, and he made KeyMo at the new company after being fired by Silencerco. Of course an engineer that develops a product and then sees the failings in it a few years later is going to develop a product that refines and corrects that issue. I disagree that those solutions wouldn't be on the market if trifecta didn't suck. They would be anyway, because its an excellent way of attracting new customers from people who already own a competing company's suppressor. It's easy to slap some threads on their mount and boom, they have a road into a new market. It's the exact same reason Silencerco made their suppressor able to accept all the mounts to begin with. Not because every other company's suppressors "sucked", but because by allowing AAC or YHM mounts and the like, people that owned stuff from those companies would be attracted to buying a Silencerco suppressor with compatible mounting solutions. View Quote |
|
Quoted: Not saying you're stupid. But referencing other companies making "aftermarket solutions" is silly. Silencerco makes mounts for AAC, YHM, etc. It's not an aftermarket solution for problems with other company's suppressors or mounts. It's a self serving way of making your product available to a wider audience. The Key-Mo wasn't made from benevolence to solve an issue with a Silencerco suppressor. It was made so people with Silencerco suppressors could purchase their mount, muzzle devices, and suppressors without having to start from scratch. Silencerco making their suppressors modular on the mounting and able to accept third party mounts to begin with was pretty nice. A lot of companies weld their shit on whether you like it or not. You can't change a Sandman or a Q suppressor to a YHM, AAC, or Silencerco mount. I'm not even defending trifecta. imho, it's a problem prone mounting system. Which is why Silencerco dumped it and upgrades people for free (mount AND muzzle devices which is amazing CS) to ASR, which is a far better system. View Quote Meanwhile cans are getting modular like the AR. And the best part of all these after market 'latest hottest' upgrades is you can get good deals in the EE on ASR mounts and muzzle devices. I sympathize with the OP; it sucks to have to dick with an expensive item that was ostensibly engineered for an NFA lifetime. Let us know how it gets resolved. |
|
Quoted: No shit. Having a welded on 18T AAC mount sucks way worse. Even finding muzzle devices is getting hard. But the other side of that coin is having a beater can that's comfortable like an old pair of work boots. It's also possible to get an 02/07 to weld a new mount or thread insert onto an old can if you know the metallurgy. Meanwhile cans are getting modular like the AR. And the best part of all these after market 'latest hottest' upgrades is you can get good deals in the EE on ASR mounts and muzzle devices. I sympathize with the OP; it sucks to have to dick with an expensive item that was ostensibly engineered for an NFA lifetime. Let us know how it gets resolved. View Quote I’m betting it will be over a week before SiCo responds to my voicemails and email. |
|
Quoted:
SiCo hasn't responded, I called them again and left a voicemail today. Also sent them an email. I want a swap to ASR ASAP. Pissed off. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/109690/080185F1-1C31-4241-81F4-783275A1569C-620905.JPG https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/109690/C9D56E62-2210-40BF-A018-333C4B50B085-620906.JPG https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/109690/7296E345-7AE3-420C-AB1F-0D49D6F5F8B5-620908.JPG https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/109690/24C0A2CC-C8B0-4C5F-B4D1-0C8E04FC9277-620909.JPG https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/109690/88ECA78D-BE4F-4845-A22A-931B0362BCA5-620910.JPG View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Clear case of allowing carbon buildup. Not the manufacturer's fault.... View Quote It wasn’t that dirty. Whether or not you think you know what I see in person versus what you think you perceive from online pictures does not make you an authority on any damned thing in my house. The brake was not encrusted with carbon, I know, I can go look at it right now. |
|
Spot checked my other Saker (5.56) and noticed that can of antiseize I bought solely for my cans. Oh yeah, nothing but carbon build up. Also took a picture of the brake that the Saker 762 was stuck on.
Attached File Attached File Attached File |
|
Quoted:
Clear case of allowing carbon buildup. Not the manufacturer's fault.... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
SiCo hasn't responded, I called them again and left a voicemail today. Also sent them an email. I want a swap to ASR ASAP. Pissed off. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/109690/080185F1-1C31-4241-81F4-783275A1569C-620905.JPG https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/109690/C9D56E62-2210-40BF-A018-333C4B50B085-620906.JPG https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/109690/7296E345-7AE3-420C-AB1F-0D49D6F5F8B5-620908.JPG https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/109690/24C0A2CC-C8B0-4C5F-B4D1-0C8E04FC9277-620909.JPG https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/109690/88ECA78D-BE4F-4845-A22A-931B0362BCA5-620910.JPG |
|
|
Quoted: Oh, bullshit. Complete and utter bullshit. Tell me every Trifecta owner that has had this problem did the same thing. Tell me I didn't have this generously lubed and therefore call me a liar. It wasn't that dirty. Whether or not you think you know what I see in person versus what you think you perceive from online pictures does not make you an authority on any damned thing in my house. The brake was not encrusted with carbon, I know, I can go look at it right now. View Quote The % of trifecta owners with issues is a very small sample. Of course, just as with politics, non-issues get over blown out of proportion by those not in the know. Been using suppressors for over 20 years (Surefire, SiCo, Griffin, OSS, AAC and Gemtech) and have accumulated much experience over the years with suppressors. Some have had issues, others not. Based on my experience on the range, attending classes, providing classes, etc., most suppressor issues are with the user. Hope the alternative manufacturer mounts work out.... |
|
I saw that on their instagram and was wondering if it came from this thread.
|
|
Truly, thanks for the correction on the mount development info. Id heard that multiple times, but clearly It was wrong info and it's nice to have someone that's actually involved and not speaking second or third hand talk about it. Apologies for bringing it up if it wasn't true, certainly didn't mean any malice by it! I've also got nothing against your company at all, i've got a KeyMo enroute for my 762 Saker right now.
|
|
Quoted:
Truly, thanks for the correction on the mount development info. Id heard that multiple times, but clearly It was wrong info and it's nice to have someone that's actually involved and not speaking second or third hand talk about it. Apologies for bringing it up if it wasn't true, certainly didn't mean any malice by it! View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Clear case of allowing carbon buildup. Not the manufacturer's fault.... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes All joking aside, this is truly a design issue. Can customers mess it up? Yeah, and it's poor product design that allows the customer mess it up. Nothing's foolproof, but this system allows for so much stupid stuff to happen that's totally beyond the user's control. Because of this, they abandoned the design. Quoted:
... The % of trifecta owners with issues is a very small sample. Of course, just as with politics, non-issues get over blown out of proportion by those not in the know. Been using suppressors for over 20 years (Surefire, SiCo, Griffin, OSS, AAC and Gemtech) and have accumulated much experience over the years with suppressors. Some have had issues, others not. Based on my experience on the range, attending classes, providing classes, etc., most suppressor issues are with the user. Hope the alternative manufacturer mounts work out.... I do agree, though. If anyone can break something--it's gun owners. (eta: Except jefflebowski. Totally excited you're getting a Key-Mo. ) (eta eta: Dude don't break it!) |
|
Quoted: On the CF barrel, the Cherry Bomb turns 6 3/4 rotations before seating on the shoulder, on the other barrel it gets 7 1/4 rotations. That's plenty. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/277473/20180725_222007_resized-619688.JPG https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/277473/20180725_222410_resized-619689.JPG View Quote |
|
Quoted: https://media.giphy.com/media/14ceV8wMLIGO6Q/giphy.gif There it is. I do a bit of that "training" thing myself (burned out 2 barrels on my trainer AR in relatively short order) and had a good idea on Saker Trifecta mounts, but that sounds like it's worse than any of us knew. I'm also excited about the KeyMo, I'll let you know how I like it. I really appreciate the insight, dude View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Spot checked my other Saker (5.56) and noticed that can of antiseize I bought solely for my cans. Oh yeah, nothing but carbon build up. Also took a picture of the brake that the Saker 762 was stuck on. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/109690/C5721910-4E93-429C-9DFF-E7799EB969A7-624276.JPG View Quote Pull that crush washer, pull that flash hider. Clean the threads, reinstall with ~28-30 ft/lbs of torque. |
|
Quoted: Just as a heads up, that flash hider isn't installed correctly. You'll have both a higher than average chance of strikes, and probably a much higher chance than average of the can coming off with the flash hider inside since you probably aren't at the proper torque. Pull that crush washer, pull that flash hider. Clean the threads, reinstall with ~28-30 ft/lbs of torque. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Could care less about being an authority in your house... The % of trifecta owners with issues is a very small sample. Of course, just as with politics, non-issues get over blown out of proportion by those not in the know. Been using suppressors for over 20 years (Surefire, SiCo, Griffin, OSS, AAC and Gemtech) and have accumulated much experience over the years with suppressors. Some have had issues, others not. Based on my experience on the range, attending classes, providing classes, etc., most suppressor issues are with the user. Hope the alternative manufacturer mounts work out.... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: Oh, bullshit. Complete and utter bullshit. Tell me every Trifecta owner that has had this problem did the same thing. Tell me I didn't have this generously lubed and therefore call me a liar. It wasn't that dirty. Whether or not you think you know what I see in person versus what you think you perceive from online pictures does not make you an authority on any damned thing in my house. The brake was not encrusted with carbon, I know, I can go look at it right now. The % of trifecta owners with issues is a very small sample. Of course, just as with politics, non-issues get over blown out of proportion by those not in the know. Been using suppressors for over 20 years (Surefire, SiCo, Griffin, OSS, AAC and Gemtech) and have accumulated much experience over the years with suppressors. Some have had issues, others not. Based on my experience on the range, attending classes, providing classes, etc., most suppressor issues are with the user. Hope the alternative manufacturer mounts work out.... |
|
Quoted:
If i'm not mistaken, the developer of KeyMo is the same engineer that developed trifecta, and he made KeyMo at the new company after being fired by Silencerco. Of course an engineer that develops a product and then sees the failings in it a few years later is going to develop a product that refines and corrects that issue. View Quote |
|
Quoted: I'm not even defending trifecta. imho, it's a problem prone mounting system. Which is why Silencerco dumped it and upgrades people for free (mount AND muzzle devices which is amazing CS) to ASR, which is a far better system. View Quote |
|
|
Over a week and no returned phone call, no response to my email. I guess that the SiCo CS people are busy building suppressors or something.
Thankfully, my parts from Hansohn Brothers and SWFA came in. Just finished swapping out the problem child Saker 7.62 out and test firing my hand loaded 220gr subs in my backyard range. I’m a fan of KeyMo already. |
|
I've had both the Saker 5.56 and 7.62 with Trifecta since they have come out. I got the 5.56 stuck twice before I started using LOK-CEASE. No problems since. I have no doubt that KEY-MO is superior but the Trifecta has done everything I've needed it to. If I launch a can or get it really stuck I'll be sure to eat Crow and start a thread about it.
|
|
Quoted: Just as a heads up, that flash hider isn't installed correctly. You'll have both a higher than average chance of strikes, and probably a much higher chance than average of the can coming off with the flash hider inside since you probably aren't at the proper torque. Pull that crush washer, pull that flash hider. Clean the threads, reinstall with ~28-30 ft/lbs of torque. View Quote |
|
I initially loved the MAAD Mount.
I experienced the stuck issue, and unreliable locking. Looking at the thin locking petals, I saw that they’re easily marred causing burrs to raise up, resulting in inability to unlock. There’s literally no room for error, the slightest little burr or debris would cause failure of the petal mechanism. The first mount never ratcheted right after a couple of uses. My beautiful new can went downrange like an RPG.?? Luckily no baffles were damaged. Scared the crap out of everyone standing there. The next one they sent me locked up. I don’t use crush washers, just plain flat washers or peel washers. I used anti-seize. At some point I couldn’t trust the mount. The design is bad, overly complicated and too delicate IMHO. The ASR seems more robust. And gives a greater sense that it’s locked. I haven’t used Silencerco CS for a few years. I hope they survive and improve both their engineering and CS. Because I don’t want to buy more cans what with the long approval times. We need them to be better. |
|
I’m not sure they still do trade ins, especially with their dodgy CS now.
I have a screw mount as well as my ASR. I’ve used it once, and not since getting my ASR. It works, but best to use your old flash hider to protect the threads. |
|
Quoted:
Spot checked my other Saker (5.56) and noticed that can of antiseize I bought solely for my cans. Oh yeah, nothing but carbon build up. Also took a picture of the brake that the Saker 762 was stuck on. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/109690/C5721910-4E93-429C-9DFF-E7799EB969A7-624276.JPGhttps://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/109690/7C7B3BC6-6D1B-48CD-B5DA-EB4548DB3781-624277.JPGhttps://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/109690/ADAC6D29-811E-4346-904F-0A12E13CD98D-624278.JPG View Quote Is that a crush washer I see there... |
|
Quoted:
I’m not sure they still do trade ins, especially with their dodgy CS now. I have a screw mount as well as my ASR. I’ve used it once, and not since getting my ASR. It works, but best to use your old flash hider to protect the threads. View Quote |
|
I called a couple weeks ago about switching my saker mounts. (Actually called and left a voicemail about the BOGO deal, and asked about it while I had them on the phone.)
The guy told me they would switch the modules on both my sakers, only if they determined there was a problem. When asked about the mounts, he asked how many (10) and was very hesitant to say they would replace them. He said one or two wouldn't be a problem but not that many. It was a stark contrast to all the postings I read on here that said, "Just call them and they'll replace everything for ASR." My cans get stuck occasionally, have to hit them with a rubber mallet to get them off the mount, but nothing like above. I want to switch over, before I have a serious issue and my can flies off. Esp being I bought into the trifecta line because it was supposed to be the new thing, an upgrade from the ASR specwar mount, an SiCo totally abandoned it a few years later. IMO, them abanding their latest mount design when the omega came out is a clear admission of defeat and they should switch out anyone's trifecta setup no questions asked. |
|
Quoted:
I called a couple weeks ago about switching my saker mounts. (Actually called and left a voicemail about the BOGO deal, and asked about it while I had them on the phone.) The guy told me they would switch the modules on both my sakers, only if they determined there was a problem. When asked about the mounts, he asked how many (10) and was very hesitant to say they would replace them. He said one or two wouldn't be a problem but not that many. It was a stark contrast to all the postings I read on here that said, "Just call them and they'll replace everything for ASR." My cans get stuck occasionally, have to hit them with a rubber mallet to get them off the mount, but nothing like above. I want to switch over, before I have a serious issue and my can flies off. Esp being I bought into the trifecta line because it was supposed to be the new thing, an upgrade from the ASR specwar mount, an SiCo totally abandoned it a few years later. IMO, them abanding their latest mount design when the omega came out is a clear admission of defeat and they should switch out anyone's trifecta setup no questions asked. View Quote |
|
Just emailed sico to see about swapping my 2 mounts and 4 FH/brakes.
I have only had a few minor issues, but with them dropping the design, I’m not going to keep them. Asr or keymo I guess. |
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted: Maybe someone who has had their trifecta replaced can comment but I doubt most people are swapping double digit muzzle devices... |
|
Quoted:
Quoted: Maybe someone who has had their trifecta replaced can comment but I doubt most people are swapping double digit muzzle devices... The writing was on the wall when no other can had the Trifecta mount. SiCo made it official with dropping Trifecta awhile ago when they came out with the ASR Saker. |
|
I quoted captnstabn and he said they “were very hesitant to swap (10) muzzle devices for me”
|
|
Quoted: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/109690/C5721910-4E93-429C-9DFF-E7799EB969A7-624276.JPG Is that a crush washer I see there... View Quote |
|
Quoted: Fixed.https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/109690/6490E622-8633-4E14-B267-8136F89844AF-629841.JPG View Quote |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.