User Panel
I metered the TPM MP5SD at the ear and MIL STD today. Need a few days to write it up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The short 8” TPM suppressor is very quiet; I may have to buy the transitional 12” version also to see how quiet it can get.
https://youtu.be/4O9otdz4ODc |
|
One of these days my SD can is going to clear and Im going to build a SD
|
|
Anyone ever compare the sound level with a regular MP5 and Octane 9 or Omega 9K can? I've got an Octane 9 with an Omega 9K on the way, but I only reload 147gr 9mm anyways. Wondering if I'll notice any sound difference between a MP5SD running 115gr or 124gr vs a suppressed MP5 running 147gr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attached File
Attached File Attached File Attached File Liemohn Manufacturing. A3 for transport & A2 at the range. |
|
Quoted:
Anyone ever compare the sound level with a regular MP5 and Octane 9 or Omega 9K can? I've got an Octane 9 with an Omega 9K on the way, but I only reload 147gr 9mm anyways. Wondering if I'll notice any sound difference between a MP5SD running 115gr or 124gr vs a suppressed MP5 running 147gr. View Quote |
|
Live now. Let me know your thoughts.
https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2018/07/07/mp5sd-versus-apc9/ |
|
Quoted:
Live now. Let me know your thoughts. https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2018/07/07/mp5sd-versus-apc9/ View Quote |
|
Quoted: What's the point of using 127 in the SD and 147 in the B&T? Seems like a waste of time. View Quote As bullets out of both guns will be subsonic leaving the muzzle of the can I think it's a fair comparison. |
|
Quoted: Can't shoot subs through the SD as the barrel is ported to slow supers down to subsonic. Shooting subsonic in the SD could damage the suppressor. As bullets out of both guns will be subsonic leaving the muzzle of the can I think it's a fair comparison. View Quote Point being, part of the MP5SD's "magic" is that ported barrel, so I would rather see him run 124gr (that the MP5 was built around) through both weapons, and see how the MP5SD stacks up against a more "modern" platform with a conventional silencer configuration. Edit: And the MP5 Operator's Manual by Jim Schatz says not to use subsonic ammo, below 140gr in the SD, so 147 in both would be fine also. |
|
Quoted: Can't shoot subs through the SD as the barrel is ported to slow supers down to subsonic. Shooting subsonic in the SD could damage the suppressor. As bullets out of both guns will be subsonic leaving the muzzle of the can I think it's a fair comparison. View Quote |
|
Looking forward to seeing the Omega 9k numbers compared, along with your subjective impressions.
|
|
Quoted:
Looking forward to seeing the Omega 9k numbers compared, along with your subjective impressions. View Quote |
|
Quoted: I dont want to get into that debate- as I don't believe that is the reason. Has more to do with energy and "lethality" in my opinion, than it does with poking holes in paper and using a microphone. Point being, part of the MP5SD's "magic" is that ported barrel, so I would rather see him run 124gr (that the MP5 was built around) through both weapons, and see how the MP5SD stacks up against a more "modern" platform with a conventional silencer configuration. Edit: And the MP5 Operator's Manual by Jim Schatz says not to use subsonic ammo, below 140gr in the SD, so 147 in both would be fine also. View Quote No one else thought my TPM numbers were high? |
|
A word of caution: anyone who takes my data as gospel is a fool. I’m just a guy with observations.
I just want to be clear with everyone. |
|
Quoted:
The 147 I have is subsonic. I can run 124 through both, I just figured the supersonic crack in the APC would make it not worthwhile. No one else thought my TPM numbers were high? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: I dont want to get into that debate- as I don't believe that is the reason. Has more to do with energy and "lethality" in my opinion, than it does with poking holes in paper and using a microphone. Point being, part of the MP5SD's "magic" is that ported barrel, so I would rather see him run 124gr (that the MP5 was built around) through both weapons, and see how the MP5SD stacks up against a more "modern" platform with a conventional silencer configuration. Edit: And the MP5 Operator's Manual by Jim Schatz says not to use subsonic ammo, below 140gr in the SD, so 147 in both would be fine also. No one else thought my TPM numbers were high? |
|
Quoted: Yeah, or you can run the 147 through both Jim Schatz, who wrote the MP5 manual (at least, the PDF copy I have on hand) says subsonic in the MP5SD doesn't net much of a gain in dB reduction, so I would think a 5-shot string of 147 through both, should be about as fair of a test as you could do between the 2 platforms. View Quote |
|
I’m a little surprised. I thought the MP5SD would’ve performed better.
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
Can't shoot subs through the SD as the barrel is ported to slow supers down to subsonic. Shooting subsonic in the SD could damage the suppressor. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Sure you can, I have been doing it for years. The bullets are subsonic when they reach the suppressor, either way. The only issue is to have a proper locking piece to match the recoil impulse. This from G3Kurz - RIP. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Can't shoot subs through the SD as the barrel is ported to slow supers down to subsonic. Shooting subsonic in the SD could damage the suppressor. |
|
There I was
Calling the ATF for the first time since this adventure When I realized I dont even have my SD cans serial number written down anywhere Complete fail |
|
Quoted:
There I was Calling the ATF for the first time since this adventure When I realized I dont even have my SD cans serial number written down anywhere Complete fail View Quote |
|
Quoted: You'll get the hang of it eventually... my suggestion: Excel spreadsheet, with replacement cost, serial# and any important info about said item, ex: "SD can only fits specific guns, ser# XXX-XXX" (And I also note the date forms were mailed.) View Quote |
|
Quoted: You'll get the hang of it eventually... my suggestion: Excel spreadsheet, with replacement cost, serial# and any important info about said item, ex: "SD can only fits specific guns, ser# XXX-XXX" (And I also note the date forms were mailed.) View Quote I just assumed that info was on there Im surprised to see that it looks like its blocked out. Which I really hope my dealer didnt drop the ball on getting the serial numbers on the other forms that went to the ATF I remember reading the cans serial to him. I also remember that the cans info was kinda boogered up and made you look harder. It looks like they stamped one or two of the numbers twice because they didnt hit depth or something. We both looked at it surprised they left it that way. I use to have pics... but yeah, now I have a new phone Oh wait I think I found the pics |
|
To all those who bought TPM SD guns- did any of you have issues with a crooked cocking tube or front sight not aligned?
Just curious. |
|
|
Quoted:
To all those who bought TPM SD guns- did any of you have issues with a crooked cocking tube or front sight not aligned? Just curious. View Quote Ill admit the markings on my SD can were not very impressive My dealer and I both had to really look at it when doing the form 4 Maybe one day Ill get my SD can |
|
Quoted: Nope. Haven’t ever heard of those issues with TPM. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: They ended up having another smith fix the issues, my understanding is that they tried to get TPM to fix them first. I was told of this by people involved. I've heard of other issues as well. Most seem to be happy with them although when you are paying a premium for a clone you shouldn't have to deal with that. |
|
Quoted: In the HK forum about who to send a kit to, member said TPM had issues with cocking tubes and front sights not being straight. I had never heard of this until then. Link View Quote Ill regard it as a one off if even real |
|
|
Quoted: That's sad if so Ill admit the markings on my SD can were not very impressive My dealer and I both had to really look at it when doing the form 4 Maybe one day Ill get my SD can View Quote It's engraving on a can under a handguard - who cares? |
|
Quoted: Their engraving is done by a well known engraving company that gets great reviews. It's engraving on a can under a handguard - who cares? View Quote Its seriously the worst engraving Ive ever seen It looks like the can moved or something during the engraving process Im not mad about it, its just not that great and hard to read |
|
|
Finally handled a SD this weekend
Man It kinda felt like a pig upfront compared to a 3 lug suppressed MP5 It seemed quite a bit quieter than other suppressed guns going off at the event, but it was honestly too hard to compare with all the gunfire going on |
|
Quoted:
Finally handled a SD this weekend Man It kinda felt like a pig upfront compared to a 3 lug suppressed MP5 It seemed quite a bit quieter than other suppressed guns going off at the event, but it was honestly too hard to compare with all the gunfire going on View Quote And people talk about smack if you build a PCC on the AR platform, saying that it is an AR trying to be a PDW. Okay. Well I can build a 9mm AR, suppress it and be under 5lbs easy. As short or shorter than a MP5SD. If I do it with something like the CMMG Roller system, Im getting pretty golden now. Labels are labels. |
|
Quoted: 7.5lbs is the spec weight on a MP5SD. If I got a MP5, I would probably run my own supressor for that reson. And people talk about smack if you build a PCC on the AR platform, saying that it is an AR trying to be a PDW. Okay. Well I can build a 9mm AR, suppress it and be under 5lbs easy. As short or shorter than a MP5SD. If I do it with something like the CMMG Roller system, Im getting pretty golden now. Labels are labels. View Quote That said, man a AR9 just feels wrong to me when I shoot them. That's why I dont like them. They just feel harsh. Granted I have not used the CMMG roller system you mention |
|
Quoted:
Only place Ive ever heard a ill word spoken about them Ill regard it as a one off if even real View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: In the HK forum about who to send a kit to, member said TPM had issues with cocking tubes and front sights not being straight. I had never heard of this until then. Link Ill regard it as a one off if even real |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.