Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Posted: 6/24/2002 9:55:04 AM EDT
i have been looking at getting an L1a1/fal, etc. lately, today i looked at a CETME for the first time, and was impressed.
i'm definately going to get either a century FAL or a CETME, was wondering what the pros and cons of each are.
anyone have any good or bad with the CETME?

how easy ar mags and synthetic stocks for the CETME to come by?
thanks.
Link Posted: 6/24/2002 10:01:11 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 6/24/2002 10:04:54 AM EDT by Aimless]
Link Posted: 6/24/2002 5:36:39 PM EDT
I own a cetme and a HK91. My cetme was OK after breakin. Like the wood stocks but has no windage ajustment like on the HK91. That's a feature I like.
Link Posted: 6/24/2002 5:47:45 PM EDT
The CETME is very hard on brass, which can be an issue if you reload your ammo. If not, no big deal, bolth are great guns and will serve well.
Link Posted: 6/24/2002 7:11:15 PM EDT
that's easy,

L1A1, it is a better rifle in my opinion. Although I do desire to get a CETME after the SAR-1 and SAR-3

dave
Link Posted: 6/24/2002 7:43:54 PM EDT
Get your ffl to get a l1a1 from sog for 389 plus tax......you won`t be sorry......
Link Posted: 6/24/2002 7:47:14 PM EDT
yeah, i was kinda leaning toward the L1A1, i like synthetic stocks on my "fun" guns. and i plan on reloading in the near future, i've been saving all of my brass for the last 2 years in anticipation of this.
i also think i'm going through SOG for the L1A1

thanks for the input guys.
Link Posted: 6/24/2002 7:50:07 PM EDT
You won`t regret it..........
Link Posted: 6/24/2002 7:50:38 PM EDT
L1A1 without a doubt!

I wouldn't recommend anything that Century sells though. But hey, that's a different topic. :D
Top Top