Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Posted: 2/17/2006 4:53:58 PM EDT
Link Posted: 2/17/2006 7:12:10 PM EDT
Antiques are not logged in your book. Are you sure it's an antique?

Dennis Jenkins


Originally Posted By Mbsk01:
Would I have to log an antique in my bound book?

Link Posted: 2/17/2006 9:13:16 PM EDT
Are you talking about a pre-1898?
Link Posted: 2/18/2006 3:04:50 AM EDT
If the receiver has not been altered and is pre-1899, then it is a non-firearm in the eyes of the Feds. Even if a modern rifle, such as a Mosin M39 has been assembled around the receiver, it is still a non-firearm and should not be in your bound book.
Link Posted: 2/18/2006 3:59:54 AM EDT
Link Posted: 2/18/2006 2:34:22 PM EDT
My M39 has a 1897 tang date. I put it in the bound book though before I discovered the date.

Dennis Jenkins


Originally Posted By Mbsk01:

Originally Posted By Will-Rogers:
Even if a modern rifle, such as a Mosin M39 has been assembled around the receiver, it is still a non-firearm and should not be in your bound book.



That's what I'm looking at buying.

Thx guys.

Link Posted: 2/19/2006 5:38:54 AM EDT
When I got BATF approval for an electronic bound book, they said that antique firearms could be logged for inventory purposes if I desired but that I was not required to do so.
Top Top