As attractive as the lines are on a 1911 it irks me when companies mar the aesthetics with their signature stylings. Below are some of the things that just grate on my nerves.
Grip chop: Ed Brown's baby (seen on a night hawk & a few others). While it serves a (marginal) utility purpose, it looks awful to me.
Tacky logos/advertisements. The larger and less "official" the uglier in my opinion. Some examples:
Para Ordnance: pre 2004 was OK, then they started stamping stupid shit on the sides like "Para Carry". Even better, they came up with the PXT (external extractor) and the jagged font was printed on it to make it all "proactive and exciting". To me it just looks like a fucking cheesy Mountain Dew/Doritos "Extreme Flavor!!" wrapper.
Kimber: Not ungodly by any means but stamping a big cursive signature is the gay.
Nighthawk: I hear some excellent things about these pistols but the slide stampings in conjunction with their ridiculous "medallion" grips is just throwing the advertisement in your face. A Ferrari is a thing of beauty whose lines and workmanship speak for itself. There is no need to paint a 2' emblem on the hood.
Auto Ordnance: Silly bullet logo. Just looks cheap.
I think Colt is pushing the limit (esp with the little pony printed behind the thumb safety) but they are within the parameters of good taste. Springfield Armory, Wilson Combat, and the USGIs are all handsome representations in my opinion.
As you can see, I like the subtle traditional style which seems to complement the weapon, and feel the 1911 really needs no gaudy makeover. FWIW one "modern adulteration" I find tasteful/attractive is bushing work (beveling/melting or the bushingless system) I am sure that not everbody shares my tastes, however. So, IN TERMS OF AESTHETICS, What things have manufacturers done to 1911s that turn your stomach?