Posted: 1/11/2006 11:45:15 AM EDT
The full 10 page report is now out: This explains a lot about why we see what we see from Colt. forums.1911forum.com/showthread.php?p=1168476&posted=1#post1168476 Mark [Roberts, the new sales and marketing director for Colt] agreed and again pointed out that Colts target market was not necessarily those shooters with money burning a hole in their pockets, determined to go out and buy the “flavor of the week” 1911 advertised on the back cover of last months Handguns magazine because they had been swayed by the “neato” factor and some fancy photographs. Mark implied but did not say outright that Colts target market was somewhat more mature, had more disposable income, appreciated hand craftsmanship, could tell the difference between a barstock hammer and a cast hammer, and were willing to pay for that difference.
|
[“flavor of the week” 1911, “neato” factor] = guns with "reptile" scales You know who you are. PREVIOUS POST: Here's the preview of his report: Colt Factory Tourthe full version of which he hasn't posted yet, but should soon: As Mark mentioned, the tour went very well. Things have been crazy at work, and I want to give the report the attention it deserves, and yet give Mark a chance to see it an comment on it before I post it on a public forum. I promise you it will be true to what I saw, no holds barred, but I still feel that Mark should see the write-up first so he can correct any mistakes I might have made. (The blueing tanks were so cool I forgot to take as good notes as I should have).
I will say this as a preview... there are some companies who favor quantity over quality, CNC over hand fitting, bead blasted finish over hand polished blue, cast receivers over forged, MIM hammers over barstock, employees as "parts assemblers" over craftsman, and easy over good.
None of these things are necessarily bad, and all have their place in the business model of some companies, but for those who can tell the difference, and for whom the difference is worth paying for, sometimes the old ways are the best.
I may be stretching a bit here, but if you were in the market for a violin, which would be better, a cookie cutter model assembled rather than built, or a violin made by a single artisan? If you are tone deaf and can't play, either violin would work, but for some the difference is tangible the value derived from the hand built violin is outweights the extra cost.
During my visit I saw craftsman building 1911's one at a time by hand, I saw slide stops machined out of a single billet of steel, I saw actual human hands building 1911's, fitting, testing, fitting again until they were satisfied, I saw original draftsman prints on desks and workstations, not inside CNC machines.
Don't get me wrong, technology is a wonderful thing, without it we would not have many of the wonderful designs we have today, but in some cases the old way can be better, and hand made can be better than mass produced, and as long as there is a market for such items, Colt will be there to provide them.
Now there are downsides to craftsmanship, and building things by hand one at a time, the labor costs are higher... people need breaks CNC machines do not, it takes time to train a person while machines simply run, you do not get the cookie cutter sameness that a CNC machine and outsourced parts provide, changes are more difficult, and not every item will be perfect, because none of the artisans are perfect.
Luckily there are companies who offer both ends of the spectrum, and if you are swayed by fancy pictures in magazines, or the need for a high cap pistol, or a light rail, or simply the "gee whiz" factor, there are companies out there who will cater to you. If you think there is value to the slower more tradional path and parts selection I touched on above, then there are companies out there who cater to that market as well... and for production pistols in the latter class, a Hartford Colt made by hand would be hard to beat.
|
It provides me more fodder for when people ask me why they should buy a Colt 1911 as opposed to a Kimber.
|