Quote History Quoted:
If I had a Vickers, I'd shoot it as much as I wanted.
I don't think it's something that will be historically significant and will only appreciate in value so much before it's just an old gun.
We see in this thread that already many people don't really get or appreciate the significance of LAV and the modern 1911.
It's significant to me only because I was around LAV some in '07--'12 during the hot and heavy days of training back in the GWOT. That was a great time in my life even if I didn't realize it then.
To someone coming up now, or in the future, it'll just be an old 1911. Just like a Clark, Swenson, Pachamyr, 1911 don't hold any special place for me, but they do to guys 15-20 years older than me.
View Quote
That is an opinion I can agree with. I too would shoot the hell out of it if I were fortunate enough to be able to buy it. The late Al Mar (knife designer) once told me that it was silly for someone to buy some neat bit of kit and not use it. He said that if you don't use it, after you die, your widow will probably sell it for pennies on the dollar, and whoever buys it at that bargain price will then use the hell out of it, so you might as well be the guy using it, and enjoying it. That gave me a different perspective on buying neat stuff and using it, rather than "saving it" for some thing else.
Chances are, that for most people who buy firearms for speculation, that unless they sell the items before they die, whoever has to liquidate their estate either won't know the true value of the piece, or the auction house, or seller will get a large share of the value of the item.
The above thoughts have caused me to liquidate most of the guns that I had collected. I still have more than I can shoot, so I realize I am fortunate, and I enjoy what I kept.