Hi Gunbert,
Interesting.
The Springfield "Loaded" model 1911 pistol got "Gun Tests" magazine's "Best Pistol of the Year" award back in 1999 when it was first introduced. I bought mine in 1999. So, it's an early model with the extended guide rod with the slotted end for a regular screwdriver and no integral trigger lock.
My pistol was always very reliable with factory hardball; UMC, Win. "white box', Magtech, etc., but hated handloads with a vengence. After a lot of experimenting I've got a couple of handloads that work fine now. Primarily by using the UMC Remington round as a template. I've had to become very dedicated to trimming cases and matching headstamps and creating VERY consistant ammo. But, the pistol is now reliable with all of my (14 or so at last count) 7 and 8 round, Springfield, Colt and Wilson Combat magazines.
When my pistol was new it was very tight. The slide wouldn't just slide off the receiver, you had to pull it off. Now, after about 5,000 or 6,000 rounds or so, a trip to Springfield Armory for a "reliability package" (and a lot of grief) the thing is actually a very good pistol.
In fact, it's probably my favorite pistol. One more thing, no one else makes a "standard pattern" 1911 with a brushed stainless finish and the nicely cut ( well, I like them a lot) cocking searations on the slide ( Wilson Combat's "Stainless Protector is the only other one I know of). Also, I got to agree with you about the sharp edges. It took some use to get those polished down. Lastly, this kind of story isn't that unusual for 1911 owners. You just got to love the traditional design and historic reputation of the thing to stick with some of these pistols until you finally get them to run right. Many guys simply buy an H & K. And it's hard to argue with them.
Coolio