Quote History Quoted:
Ok, I gotta ask then - what would be up to your level of hype? I see this come up on all these new offerings, and just can't understand this logic.
A better trigger with an improved reset, aggressive texture, front serrations aren't enough? Compared to a Gen 1 shield- I think they packed in a bunch of improvement.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History Quoted:
Quoted:
Meh... About as "revolutionary" as Glock's Gen5 offerings
Sad really, all the hype for absolutely nothing...
Ok, I gotta ask then - what would be up to your level of hype? I see this come up on all these new offerings, and just can't understand this logic.
A better trigger with an improved reset, aggressive texture, front serrations aren't enough? Compared to a Gen 1 shield- I think they packed in a bunch of improvement.
Ok, for starts they could have actually put a good trigger in the gun, not just polished the same turd and called it "better". The M&P 2.0 I handled did not feel that much different than the original. Still a mushy break, which was my problem with the 1.0, not the reset.
Second, the front serrations are a joke... That little quarter inch tall strip of six measly serrations is nothing to get excited about.
The only real noteworthy improvement is the grip texture. I do like that a lot.
My point was, all the changes implemented could have just been in the form of technical changes on the Shield production line. There is nothing "2.0" about it, just a few minor improvements.