Quote History Quoted:
It was Don Williams of Action Works that told me it would need a old style barrel for replacement. Considering how long he has been working on Hi Powers I accept his word on it. Something to do with cam battering when using a new style barrel in a older HP.
View Quote
I'm unaware of such problems. FN designed the newer style barrel to be backward compatible, that was a requirement of many military organizations whom were buying replacement parts for their Hi Powers. You can find that information in the book "The Browning Hi Power Automatic Pistol" by R. Blake Stevens.
Also, when I worked for Pacific International in the 1980's, we imported 12,000 Inglis Hi Powers from China (war surplus). The most common problem we had to fix to make those guns workable again was the barrel and the sear springs. The rounded style barrel cam had issues with shearing off, and there were several dozen out of the 12k that indeed did have the barrel cams sheared off. We bought barrels from FN by the case, 50 barrels per "case", and those barrels were late style barrels and FN assured us they WERE in fact backward compatible. We didn't have ANY pistol come back to us for anything barrel related.
BTW, when they redesigned the barrel cam that is also when they went to the two piece barrel design. The two piece design allowed them to make barrels with grain structure that was correct for the barrel AND the locking cams. Prior to the two piece design, the grain structure was such that it favored barrel strength while somewhat compromising locking cam strength. So contrary to internet 'expert's' claims, the two piece barrels are actually STRONGER than the older one piece style...it wasn't a cost saving design, but a strengthening design. After that re-design, barrel cam shear became a very rare issue.
The most important element in choosing a barrel is how well it's fit to the pistol.