Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Posted: 1/16/2006 7:19:20 AM EDT
I want something that is durable and accurate. I will also carry this gun when it is cold. I know both guns are great but just getting some opinions.
Link Posted: 1/16/2006 8:38:26 AM EDT
I can not comment too much on the Glock, as I do not own any, but I have had no problems with my Sig pistols (P220 and P229R-DAK); personally, I like the ability of the DAK (or any double action) to repeat strike in the event of a failure to fire... not possible with the Glock mechanism.

-tjg
Link Posted: 1/16/2006 9:30:24 AM EDT
Good point. I have a 220 .45 now and shoot it well so I will probably end up getting the SIG just because they are such good guns. Thanks.
Link Posted: 1/16/2006 1:08:07 PM EDT
I do not have any experience with the Sig 226. I can say that the glock 34 is very easy to shoot well and is 100% reliable. I used my 34 for IDPA for a period of about 6 weeks during a hectic month. It went through atleast 600 rds without cleaning and never had any kind of malfunction. Hope it helps.
Link Posted: 1/17/2006 9:20:23 AM EDT
I much prefer the Sig 226. The DAK is a little long but very smooth. Also consider which feels better in your hand. For some reason Most Glocks do not fit my hand very well.
Link Posted: 1/17/2006 7:56:07 PM EDT
I will say get the DAK. I own a 229R DAK and can not stop loving this pistol. The constant trigger pull is sweet, better that I had expected. Now I am true DAK believer... Yo won´t regret it.
Link Posted: 1/20/2006 7:05:43 PM EDT
You were right about the DAK. Ever since I brought mine home I can't leave it alone.
Link Posted: 1/20/2006 7:10:41 PM EDT
From personal experience I can say that the Glock will work well past 50K with nothing more than $15 in springs and some plastic parts, but I can't say that about a SIG. YMMV.
Top Top