Quoted:
WHAT THE FUCK FUCKING FUCK FUCK FUCK!

FUCKING BULLSHIT!

FUCK!

I just want a damn Glock carbine already.

Quoted:
Threads like this show why people think the Glock community is so toxic...

Glock makes the 42 - People bitch because it’s not a 9mm

Glock makes the 43 - People bitch because it's bigger than the .380

Glock makes the Gen5 without finger grooves (like the community asked for) - People bitch because they want the finger grooves back

Glock introduces the 19X (because people showed interest in the MHS) - People bitch because it' not what THEY wanted...

I have never seen a community that will literally bitch about absolutely ANYTHING that a company does.

http://e.lvme.me/ub1smht.jpg

Quoted:
There seems to be a lot of misconception that this pistol is somehow intended for concealed carry.  It certainly could work in that role but its primary function (in the MHS format) was a duty pistol.  Concealed carry is hardly the only market there is for handguns and despite what is posted here I doubt most concealed carriers carry a gun even as large as a G19.  At any rate Glock already makes a great gun for concealed carry for those who can live with its size, some may have heard of it, it is called the 19.  I don't really buy into the utility of a G17 slide on a G19 frame.  I'm not against Glock making it, the more the merrier, if it sells then great.  However, are we really convinced that an extra 1/2" of barrel/slide is the answer to our concealed carry prayers?  Sure, it might offer a slight overall improvement but I think it is way oversold.  I don't notice a practical difference in speed of handling or accuracy between my G17 and G19.  If there is any difference at all in terms of handling it is slightly in favor of the 19.

The shorter slide makes sense in a duty holster.  My first duty gun was a Beretta 92.  There is a huge difference in comfort level when sitting in a patrol car (or other vehicle I imagine, I was never in the military) with a 5" barreled gun as opposed to a 4" barreled gun.  Sure, its an inch, but in the case of a duty holster it is an extra inch sticking into the seat and pushing the holster up or banging into the seat belt anchor in the seat.  My G23 duty gun is a lot more comfortable than the Beretta 96 it replaced when seated in a car.

The 19x also makes sense, just like a 17 or 19, for home defense.  There is nothing wrong with choosing a shorter slide/longer frame for that role and it might work for some people.  Nothing wrong with more choices.

If I am ever in a position where I have to provide my own duty gun I would seriously consider this; shorter slide for comfort when seated, full size grip and two extra rounds.  I'll probably buy one anyway just because I like the way it looks.  I don't "need" it, but I don't "need" most of my guns.  On the other hand, the whole 19 frame/17 slide thing doesn't appeal to me at all.  Different strokes for different folks.

Quoted:
There seems to be a lot of misconception that this pistol is somehow intended for concealed carry.  It certainly could work in that role but its primary function (in the MHS format) was a duty pistol.  Concealed carry is hardly the only market there is for handguns and despite what is posted here I doubt most concealed carriers carry a gun even as large as a G19.  At any rate Glock already makes a great gun for concealed carry for those who can live with its size, some may have heard of it, it is called the 19.  I don't really buy into the utility of a G17 slide on a G19 frame.  I'm not against Glock making it, the more the merrier, if it sells then great.  However, are we really convinced that an extra 1/2" of barrel/slide is the answer to our concealed carry prayers?  Sure, it might offer a slight overall improvement but I think it is way oversold.  I don't notice a practical difference in speed of handling or accuracy between my G17 and G19.  If there is any difference at all in terms of handling it is slightly in favor of the 19.

The shorter slide makes sense in a duty holster.  My first duty gun was a Beretta 92.  There is a huge difference in comfort level when sitting in a patrol car (or other vehicle I imagine, I was never in the military) with a 5" barreled gun as opposed to a 4" barreled gun.  Sure, its an inch, but in the case of a duty holster it is an extra inch sticking into the seat and pushing the holster up or banging into the seat belt anchor in the seat.  My G23 duty gun is a lot more comfortable than the Beretta 96 it replaced when seated in a car.

The 19x also makes sense, just like a 17 or 19, for home defense.  There is nothing wrong with choosing a shorter slide/longer frame for that role and it might work for some people.  Nothing wrong with more choices.

If I am ever in a position where I have to provide my own duty gun I would seriously consider this; shorter slide for comfort when seated, full size grip and two extra rounds.  I'll probably buy one anyway just because I like the way it looks.  I don't "need" it, but I don't "need" most of my guns.  On the other hand, the whole 19 frame/17 slide thing doesn't appeal to me at all.  Different strokes for different folks.

Quoted:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/54857/if-it-is-glock-perfection-why-do-they-keep-changing-it-407347.JPG

Quoted:
Threads like this show why people think the Glock community is so toxic...

Glock makes the 42 - People bitch because it’s not a 9mm

Glock makes the 43 - People bitch because it's bigger than the .380

Glock makes the Gen5 without finger grooves (like the community asked for) - People bitch because they want the finger grooves back

Glock introduces the 19X (because people showed interest in the MHS) - People bitch because it' not what THEY wanted...

I have never seen a community that will literally bitch about absolutely ANYTHING that a company does.

http://e.lvme.me/ub1smht.jpg

Quoted:
Threads like this show why people think the Glock community is so toxic...

Quoted:

Very true, it does make a little bit of a difference when seated wearing a duty holster. The difference isn't huge but it is there. That is kind of the point though, .47" isn't a big deal much of the time. Given that I fail to see the problem so many seem to have with this pistol. Is a .47" longer slide really the answer to the much pursued "perfect defensive pistol?"  If this gun had come to market with a G17 slide to match the G17 frame we wouldn't even be having this discussion. Glock probably should have called it the 17K instead of the 19X, then people would be falling all over themselves to get one.

As for holsters with attached lights, I've never been a fan. Perhaps that is because through most of my law enforcement career that wasn't a serious option and I have never warmed to the idea. I just don't like the extra bulk and the draw stroke with an attached light. For someone who uses an attached light this pistol has less to offer. I also agree that it isn't likely to see much duty use unless it is available in Black. FDE May look "cool" but most department administrators are not going to sign off on guns so colored.

Quoted:
If the gun is more expensive than a 17 Gen 5, then it makes no sense at all. And why does it have to be FDE?

Quoted:
Is this gun built of Gen 3, 4, or 5 architecture?

Quoted:

The Glock community is toxic but not because Glock owners think the 19X is retarded. It's toxic because people like to dress up their $500 pistols and pretend they are a storm trooper or other fictional character with a $3,500 plastic pistol.

Quoted:

The Glock community is toxic but not because Glock owners think the 19X is retarded. It's toxic because people like to dress up their $500 pistols and pretend they are a storm trooper or other fictional character with a $3,500 plastic pistol.

Quoted:

I'm sorry what I do with my money triggers you.

https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4580/27042134179_44f99ca97f_o.jpg2017-12-03_07-00-02 by The One and Only "B"!, on Flickr

Quoted:
There seems to be a lot of misconception that this pistol is somehow intended for concealed carry.  It certainly could work in that role but its primary function (in the MHS format) was a duty pistol.  Concealed carry is hardly the only market there is for handguns and despite what is posted here I doubt most concealed carriers carry a gun even as large as a G19.  At any rate Glock already makes a great gun for concealed carry for those who can live with its size, some may have heard of it, it is called the 19.  I don't really buy into the utility of a G17 slide on a G19 frame.  I'm not against Glock making it, the more the merrier, if it sells then great.  However, are we really convinced that an extra 1/2" of barrel/slide is the answer to our concealed carry prayers?  Sure, it might offer a slight overall improvement but I think it is way oversold.  I don't notice a practical difference in speed of handling or accuracy between my G17 and G19.  If there is any difference at all in terms of handling it is slightly in favor of the 19.

The shorter slide makes sense in a duty holster.  My first duty gun was a Beretta 92.  There is a huge difference in comfort level when sitting in a patrol car (or other vehicle I imagine, I was never in the military) with a 5" barreled gun as opposed to a 4" barreled gun.  Sure, its an inch, but in the case of a duty holster it is an extra inch sticking into the seat and pushing the holster up or banging into the seat belt anchor in the seat.  My G23 duty gun is a lot more comfortable than the Beretta 96 it replaced when seated in a car.

The 19x also makes sense, just like a 17 or 19, for home defense.  There is nothing wrong with choosing a shorter slide/longer frame for that role and it might work for some people.  Nothing wrong with more choices.

If I am ever in a position where I have to provide my own duty gun I would seriously consider this; shorter slide for comfort when seated, full size grip and two extra rounds.  I'll probably buy one anyway just because I like the way it looks.  I don't "need" it, but I don't "need" most of my guns.  On the other hand, the whole 19 frame/17 slide thing doesn't appeal to me at all.  Different strokes for different folks.

Quoted:
They sold out but can be notified when they come back in.

https://www.gtdist.com/glock-19x-9mm-gns-5-5lb-le-pistol.html

Quoted:
I am holding one in my hand right now if anyone has questions.

Quoted:
Buds taking pre-orders, 629 cash discount price.

Quoted:
They should be the same price as a 17 Gen 5.

Quoted:

It's going to be a few bucks more since it has night sights.  $629 seems like a good price.

Quoted:

@thetacticalcoyote tell us about it.

How is the balance?

Worth the price?

Quoted:

I'm sorry what I do with my money triggers you.

https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4580/27042134179_44f99ca97f_o.jpg2017-12-03_07-00-02 by The One and Only "B"!, on Flickr

Quoted:

@Finslayer83

I would say we finally have our Glock Commander. Balance is great, feels more in the hand and less nose heavy, even with an empty magazine.

It will take Glock 19 Gen 5 slides, the lanyard loop comes out, and I think if one were to trim the front edge off, Gen 4 magwells will fit on it.

I will be taking it home tonight.

Quoted:

Do you have a Gen5 17 slide you can try to put on it?  I'm guessing the X is a modified 19 frame and not a modified 17, and a gen 5 17 slide won't fit it?