First, I have personally inspected representative samples of every Hesse product except for the galil receiver. I wouyldn't touch any of them with a ten foot pole. I have been accused of "arrogance" (I am arrogant, damnit, I earned the right) for refusing to build on low-quality Hesse junk. But why should I spend hours upon hours trying to force an out-of-spec piece of shit into a one-of gun that may work, but has no parts interchangeability? As to the AK receivers - I guess the poster hasn't seen the warped and twisted AK receivers that hesse won't warrany replace. I think he is a criminal fraud, but there is always someone willing to buy whatever is cheapest.
The big question is, can somone make just enough galil receivers to maike a profit? Are there enough interested buyers? My experience, and it is shared by several other manufacturers with whom I have discussed the issue, is only 20% of the "you make it and I'll buy it" crown actually pony up the money.
I made 100 postban galil brakes. It was a sizeable investment in tooling, and programming, and I am thrilled with the results. But I also expected to sell most of them in the first few weeks. Thus far, sales have been much lower than anticipated. The same results with a costly receiver couyld bankrupt a company.
By the way - shameless plug - see the US galil brake (flashider replica) at
www.arizonaresponsesystems.com/smith/ak/pagesmithak.htmThe reason Hesse casts his recievers is that, despite a high initial investment in the moulds ($50K+) the per unit cost is low. Suppose the cost is only in the mould and the units are free (not true of course, but for comparison). At $500 a pop, that is still 100 units to sell just to pay for the mould.
The lowest price DSA has ever retailed one of their receivers for is $350. I figure its about the same complication. Slightly more so maybe because the headspace is not adjustable, and with chrome-lined barrels, is really tough to compensate for even a .004" tolerance (difference between a GO and NOGO).
All my builds thus far have been on IMI Sporter receivers and all have headspaced and timed with only minimum fitting.
Then there is the liability issue. How much insurance? Don't have to have done anything wrong to get sued because someone's receiver blew up. And it will cost tens of thousands of dollars to be found not guilty.
So yes, it can be done, but when DSA started making receivers, they already had 100,000 kits and plenty of import recievers and parts to use to keep cash flow going while the production ran. Then they slowly started replacing their import parts with US made parts. I just don't think there is enough demand or parts availability to make it worth while. I'd certaitly like to see it. Maybe if the AW ban is not renewed and ATF eases their arbitrary imported parts restrictions, there would be enough interest. But I charge $500 for my builds. Of course, you get a gun built to the same exacting specs as the original, but how many people are willing to drop the $1500 for a high quality gun?
Century guns suck, but there are lots of people who will pay $500 for garbage. Not as many willing to pay $1500 for quality.
And anyone willing to take the time to machine one from a forged billet is probably not going to skimp on quality. There is too much per-unit cost to eat for bad machining.
So while I have hopes for otherwise, I suspect cast receivers are all we are going to see.