Sorry folks,
I've been pestering people over at the Galil/Valmet forum and everywhere else. Now it's your turn. Here's the deal:
I own two ARs and now I want an AK system rifle - this would be shot monthly and maybe used in tactical class on occasion. I don't like the "feel" of normal AKs - I'm tall and have long arms and they don't fit me at all, no matter how I try to adapt to them. So this leaves out all the Arsenal, Vepr, Poly Tech, Bulgarians, etc.
I saw a Galil at the range and loved it but I'd have to sell a kidney to get one. Unfortunately, this type of AK variant has the ergonomics that I need. I've researched Galil, Valmet, Krebs KTR, Robinson, and most recently Daewoo. All seem to have strengths and weaknesses. I want a 7.62 but I'll take a .223 - I don't need or want a 308.
I like the Krebs KTR because it is made in the USA and it has places to mount optics, etc. but they are expensive and probably will not keep their value. Pluses are that I could get it chambered in the 7.62 and mags are cheap.
Ditto on the Robinson's.
The Galil is expensive even in .223 (forget the 7.62 - obscenely expensive) and has no way to mount optics - mags are expensive and parts? They will never lose value and will probably appreciate. Parts?
Ditto the Valmet although they are not quite as expensive.
I don't know anything about the .223 Daewoos (I've asked about them on the AR forum) except I saw one recently and it was pretty nice - I know they are a hybrid and are the least expensive of the bunch but parts may be an issue. They can use AR15 mags I guess, which is a plus.
My question is do I get the Krebs/Robinson shooters and to hell with appreciation (if I love it, I won't be selling it anyway) or save for the Valmet/Galil and put up with iron sights but have a classic battle rifle?
Thanks for reading my ramblings!
John