User Panel
Posted: 9/8/2017 4:49:44 PM EDT
So the new Aimpoint CompM5 has been released.
Unfortunately the first production batch(es) are bound for .gov sales so it sounds like the first units for commercial sale won't fit the shelves for a few moths yet. The CompM5, for those who haven't heard, is close in size to the T1/T2 but runs on a AAA battery. It uses the T1 format mounting holes so any of the Scalarworks or other cool mounting options will apply to the M5. The M5 also has an additional piece of glass up front--or maybe a thicker front lens?--to improve the optic's durability in case of severe impact. Otherwise, it sounds like the optic is pretty much the same stuff we've come to expect. Long battery life, 4 NV 10 Daytime settings, etc. |
|
As I understand this the M5 is being made at the request of groups who work OCONUS who want a small T1-type but might have a hard time finding batteries overseas. The little lithium button battery is easy to find here but probably ain't super common in Africa or the Middle East.
An "S" model certainly would have seemed the most logical choice. Unless there's some kind of compatibility issues with a low compartment and legacy T1 mounts. |
|
|
Needs a 25mm window and on their choice of battery compartment position
Do they not see what's happening with the MRO that has slight magnification, fisheye, couldn't be uglier, but has a slightly larger ocular lens for cheekweld tolerance which creates its demand? |
|
Quoted:
Needs a 25mm window and on their choice of battery compartment position Do they not see what's happening with the MRO that has slight magnification, fisheye, couldn't be uglier, but has a slightly larger ocular lens for cheekweld tolerance which creates its demand? View Quote |
|
The M5 takes AAA batteries?
I still say the M2, M3 Carbine, or PRO is the best choice all around. What was wrong that they had to switch from the cr 1/3n to the AA in the first place? The Cr 1/3ns are tiny, not expensive when you buy them online; last a very long time and don't corrode like alkaline AAs do. I love the Aimpoints I have. |
|
I feel like some of our market demand analysis from a few minutes of reading makes their full time employees focused on this stuff seem negligent
|
|
Nothing is wrong with the CR 1/3N but is it an international standard?
That's the idea with the M5. To provide an optic that uses a battery that's common in far corners of the globe. |
|
Quoted:
Nothing is wrong with the CR 1/3N but is it an international standard? That's the idea with the M5. To provide an optic that uses a battery that's common in far corners of the globe. View Quote I am still on the original battery in a couple of my Aimpoints from at least 8 years ago. I bought a bunch of extra cheap online a while ago but will probably expire before I need to use them. |
|
Quoted:
Whether it's common or not, the Cr 1/3n can be purchased anywhere, as far as I know and lasts an extremely long time in Aimpoints; so.you only need one for several years and that's if you leave the Aimpoints on all of the time. I am still on the original battery in a couple of my Aimpoints from at least 8 years ago. I bought a bunch of extra cheap online a while ago but will probably expire before I need to use them. View Quote This was created at the REQUEST of the State Department. Your opinion on their needs isn't really pertinent. http://soldiersystems.net/2017/05/07/aimpoint-m5-in-the-wild/ http://soldiersystems.net/2016/08/06/a-new-aimpoint-aa-powered-micro-variant/ ETA: About the time this was first announced there was also suddenly AA and AAA weapon lights and IR laser systems announced that points to there being groups of people who need the ability to use cheap standard batteries where lithium batteries can't be found or shipped to. |
|
Quoted:
The M5 takes AAA batteries? I still say the M2, M3 Carbine, or PRO is the best choice all around. What was wrong that they had to switch from the cr 1/3n to the AA in the first place? The Cr 1/3ns are tiny, not expensive when you buy them online; last a very long time and don't corrode like alkaline AAs do. I love the Aimpoints I have. View Quote |
|
Originally Posted By Alaskanforfreedom:
Who the hell buys a $600+ Aimpoint and puts a 50 cent AA in it? View Quote I put alkalines in one of my Eotechs and it leaked but no real damage. After that happened, I put in lithiums. |
|
Quoted:
Who the hell buys a $600+ Aimpoint and puts a 50 cent AA in it? Lithium AAs are like only $6 for a 2 or 4 pack. Also here in AK I can't find the damn 2L76 batteries anywhere. I could order them online but no-one seems to want to send lithium batteries to my PO Box. View Quote |
|
|
So they junked up a nice optic to be mil-spec? The cloners will pay out for 'em after some 'in the wild' pics get posted.
|
|
$1000.00 MSRP. Check their FB page. I have a post asking questions about it under sean hoody.
Nope. So much nope. |
|
Quoted:
$1000.00 MSRP. Check their FB page. I have a post asking questions about it under sean hoody. Nope. So much nope. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
They said the MSRP with a standard mount is $922. I believe the MSRP on the T2 with a standard mount is $872 so it looks like a $50 difference. You can get the T2 with a LaRue mount for $759 so this one could possibly be as much as $809. View Quote |
|
|
|
Quoted:
I agree. That's what I haven't bought nor will ever buy anything else than a M2 ,M3, or PRO. ( Or perhaps a Carbine optic with a better mount) View Quote I remember when the SRS was first announced and everyone shit their pants because of the price. (NOT trying to start an optic war here. Simply price statement) |
|
Quoted:
I agree. That's why I haven't bought nor will ever buy anything else than a M2 ,M3, or PRO. ( or perhaps a Carbine optic with a better mount) View Quote Just have to know where to look and be patient. |
|
I totally get the "why" of this optic.
But I'll agree with those who see little point to it for the civilian shooter. I've also noticed that AP seems to slowly raise their prices about $75 with each feature release and slowly raised them to stupid cash levels. |
|
I agree with the post above on the why. Even for civilian use. But at some point one has to begin to wonder... a lot of this technology is ancient. This should have been a 600 optic.
|
|
There is no reason other then $ that AP's cost so much..... You KNOW they must make a ton of $ on each one.
But I'll keep my M4s. I like that when I run out of bullets, I can release the quick mount & then bash the M4s into a BG's head knock them out, remount it then go get more ammo. |
|
Quoted:
There is no reason other then $ that AP's cost so much..... You KNOW they must make a ton of $ on each one. View Quote That being said, the PRO is, the by far best bang for your buck; with the modern Aimpoint offerings. I'd even buy a Carbine optic and used mount over the more expensive Aimpoints The carbine is the old ML2 and Pro is the almost M3. It's like an M 2.5 lol. The micros and other offerings don't justify the much higher price tag. ( Imo) The government and military has the green;so cost isn't an issue to them. |
|
I'll wait patiently for the inevitable M5s variant. Until then my T2 and M4s still reign supreme in the RDS world.
|
|
Concerning Aimpoint cost... Aren't they made in Sweden?
Have you guys ever looked at the exchange rate between the USD and Swedish Kroner? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like internally it's the same as a t2 with the added length being used for a sacrificial window. You can see the slanted and red coated lens back inside and then a flat clear lense out front.
Kinda cool you can clean the lense without worrying about scratching the shit out of the coating. Wonder if the ocular has a similar set up? |
|
You can scour the EE and find very lightly used T2's with larue mounts for $600-$625
|
|
|
Last successive post but interesting - the M5 product page shows a 1.0 magnification with a +/- 3%. What I'm reading is this is basically saying 1.03 magnification. The first you'll see on an AP product page. This is probably in line with their other RDS's as most know they aren't true 1x
|
|
Quoted:
Last successive post but interesting - the M5 product page shows a 1.0 magnification with a +/- 3%. What I'm reading is this is basically saying 1.03 magnification. The first you'll see on an AP product page. This is probably in line with their other RDS's as most know they aren't true 1x View Quote |
|
Quoted:
I totally get the "why" of this optic. But I'll agree with those who see little point to it for the civilian shooter. I've also noticed that AP seems to slowly raise their prices about $75 with each feature release and slowly raised them to stupid cash levels. View Quote |
|
|
|
Yep, a 25mm Micro with a AAA battery compartment built into the mount, preferably lower third would be perfect for the T3. But even keeping the 2032 batteries are not an issue CONUS.
|
|
Quoted:
The M5 takes AAA batteries? I still say the M2, M3 Carbine, or PRO is the best choice all around. What was wrong that they had to switch from the cr 1/3n to the AA in the first place? The Cr 1/3ns are tiny, not expensive when you buy them online; last a very long time and don't corrode like alkaline AAs do. I love the Aimpoints I have. View Quote I have convinced myself the M3 is the best all around Aimpoint. I foolishly sold mine to buy Micros, but then I realized my mistake and have been hoarding M3 Aimpoints whenever I can find them. |
|
The problem with the M4 is it is too bulky and has no provision for a rubber overcover.
The T2 will reign supreme over the M5 due to the M5 having a high AAA battery compartment that obstructs view. |
|
what size is the lens on the M5? I feel like its a major fail if its a similar size to the T2 rather then the M4. I mean who needs another T2 variant. Well whatever, I am not a T2 fan the window is just to small for picking up the dot quickly but I am pretty picky and want the best of both world when I purchase things.
|
|
Quoted:
The problem with the M4 is it is too bulky and has no provision for a rubber overcover. The T2 will reign supreme over the M5 due to the M5 having a high AAA battery compartment that obstructs view. View Quote |
|
Did you guys not read the thread? This was designed to be a micro that takes a common battery for users in various environments that have a hard time getting 2032 batteries. IMO it was not designed to compete with the MRO or another Aimpoint product. It was a specific product developed to cater to a very specific user issue.
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.