There is basically two ways to look at optics – relative and/or absolute. Relative is how good it is compared to another. This scale is less useful as unless you buy the best and most expensive, it is always not quite as good. Absolute is more useful as it looks as how good it is as a function of what you need it to do.
On the relative scale, the Trijicon Accupoint scopes are definitely not the best or the most expensive – that is a no brainer. On the absolute scale, the Trijicon are not your cheap optic, mine cost over $800 and so it is expected to provide good glass, robust construction, and reliable service – it scores very good on all three parameters. I shoot up to 600 yards high power matches with it and don’t find it deficient and can hit the x-ring with this scope. When I miss, it is mostly a reflection of my skills (or lack of), environmental conditions, and imperfection in the ammunition that I still need to work on. Buying a more expensive scope will help, but only in a very limited sense and in my opinion pretty much a waste of effort with limited returns.