Quoted:Quoted:Quoted:I don't think it blows the ACOG out of the water, I had two SN4s over the years, always ended up selling it. Still have my 4 4x32 ACOGs
USO glass is superior to what Trijicon uses in ACOGS. I honestly don't see how you can say otherwise with a straight face. Now, if the question is which is the better combat optical sight, ACOG wins hands down, due to it's simplicity and ruggedness.
Go with the ACOG optics or Nightforce 1 /4 NXS –– I have owned a few differnet USO scopes over the years ( Got sucked into all the Hype ) with in weeks of owning them I sold them- I was not impressed with the Glass
Hype? USO glass is all Schott glass, same source for Zeiss (who owns Schott), Swarovski, and Schmidt & Bender. Their simply is no better glass out there then Schott. If you had an issue with the glass, you should have contacted USO, there was something probably wrong with the scope, either tube contamination due to leaks or someone didn't follow the specific lens cleaning instructions USO provides and used a lens cleaning cloth and/or solution, which is a "no-no" with high end glass coatings.
I don't want to turn this into another pointless "my scope is better then your scope" argument, you're happy with your Nightforce, and that's really all that matters. NF is a good scope, good glass, and I wouldn't try to knock it down. I simply prefer my USO's for variable power scopes in any power range.