Quoted:
Again if spraying something on the contacts would keep sights operational this is something that BELONGS IN THE MANUAL to accompany a bottle of the said spray at armorer level or within the sight's box, and the sight should come with the treatment applied. The soldier doesn't know-- the manual should inform him.
|
I don't disagree that it SHOULD be taught as S.O.P. and provided.
But we both know many, many things in the Army are not taught formally, and are not provided by uncle sam. I have been told by returning coworkers, for example, that there were not even enough weapon cleaning materials to go around, they had to ask family and friends to send them. Fucked up? Sure. But this is so typical of the Army I remember. And the Army my father told me about. And the Army my grandfather told me about. Some things never change.
Veteran soldiers will learn the right way to do things, and the field expedient method that works and pass it on to green troops. Like tieing all your shit down with 550 parachute cord. No manual will tell you to do that. And yet when some raw recruit loses a $15,000 set of 3rd Gen NVGs in the brush because he didn't do it, the value of these practices becomes evident.
This is why the experienced NCO corps is critical. Of course there will always be those who say "It wasn't provided. I could not do anything." Well to a good soldier the maximum range of an excuse is Zero.
In my unit, we made do, and we made it work, no matter what. What the gov't didn't give us, we bought with our unit fund or our own dollars. In that respect soldiering has not changed.
Sure, they should bring it up in AARs, do everything they can to make it change for the better, but in the end, the maximum range of an excuse is
still zero.