OK, I have seen the aluminium machined covers for the TA11. I considered buying one simply to protect the glass; but it mentions the primary purpose as being for OEG use. I've also seen discussion of taping over the objective to get the same effect.
When I run a TA11 in a Larue or TA51 mount, I use a nose to the charging handle cheek weld. If I put my nose behind the charging handle, I have a nice "chipmunk cheek" thing going on with the Magpul stock and can keep a pretty good cheek weld in most circumstances and see a full view.
When I want to go OEG, I move my head a hair so that the bottom of the tip of my nose is touching the top of the charging handle. At this point I can no longer see through the TA11 as I am at the edge of the exit pupil; but I can still see the donut and use it as an OEG for close-range (15-20yds) blasting where I just need shots to fall into a 6" circle.
I still haven't got a lot of time with this system; but so far it has worked well in just playing around. With the ARMS #19s I used to run, the mount was just a hair higher where it was more difficult to keep a good reference point while trying to look over the top of the TA11.
I'm assuming though that there is some reason that people prefer the $80 aluminium cap for OEG use though since I am sure they would ditch the extra weight and time to flip the cap if they felt there was a way around it. Since I know we still have a few knowledgable shooters who put rounds down range on a regular basis here, I thought I would ask their opinion on this issue. What has been working for you or not working for you when using this method?