Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Posted: 3/12/2006 11:39:30 PM EDT
Looking for someone who has tried this.
Link Posted: 3/16/2006 10:53:13 PM EDT
Back to the top.
Link Posted: 3/16/2006 11:07:33 PM EDT
The mags are just being shipped, so I doubt anyone except CProducts employees have had a chance to check it out. JMO.


TS
Link Posted: 3/30/2006 2:47:11 PM EDT
Anyone?
Link Posted: 3/30/2006 2:55:41 PM EDT
Link Posted: 3/30/2006 4:10:59 PM EDT
They do.
Link Posted: 3/30/2006 7:26:20 PM EDT
Mine fit just fine.
Link Posted: 3/30/2006 10:15:55 PM EDT
Thanks, for the info!
Link Posted: 3/31/2006 4:38:17 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 3/31/2006 7:24:43 AM EDT by edhall]
The MagPul Ranger Plates fit the Both the Stainless Steel and the aluminum Mags, with one issue.

On my Mags, the SS with Ranger Plates takes out some of the extra room for seating the mag into a closed bolt, BUT IT WILL STILL CLOSE WITH MINIMUAL PRESSURE. Much better than a standard USGI Mag loaded with 30 rounds.

The aluminum Mag however, just lets the last bullet fit in place with VERY LITTLE ROOM left. You should make sure you are comfortable with this situation, BEFORE you rely on it.

I tried the CProducts aluminum Mag in my weapons and they would still chamber a round with out problem.

I have only tried the 1 aluminum mag so far though.


I really like the CProducts SS Mag with Marlude. It has been inserted into a (Closed Bolt) Mag well over 100 times now It is showing minimal wear. It also seats easy on a closed bolt!



REMEMBER, Larry at CProducts has the NEW TaticalPul for the magazines. It looks to me like it uses less of a plate insert than the Magpul Ranger Plate, so it should take up less space inside the Mag wich would allow better seating, not that the seating is hard now with the Ranger Plates.
Top Top