Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Posted: 8/10/2010 5:28:54 PM EDT
anyone use this? comments?
Link Posted: 8/10/2010 5:52:50 PM EDT
cracked open one box (25 rounds I think) - clean looking, everyone went bang - did not do much of an evaluation ( no chrono ) - just wanted to make sure everything worked - this was a few months ago and my recollection was accuracy was good (for mil quality ammo) and shot pretty clean to me.
not much of an evaluation i know - I was asking about it as well some months ago with no real responses.
Link Posted: 8/11/2010 4:18:28 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 8/11/2010 4:19:27 AM EDT by CAR_16]
It seems to be too expensive and too pretty for anyone to do a comprehensive evaluation.

Personally, I would like to see a Molon-syle range report on this ammo.
Link Posted: 8/11/2010 1:15:20 PM EDT
Comes in 50rd boxes packed in nice, new 50cal ammo cans w/wire seals. I think the ammo can is your price difference. I shot one box, my mission that day was to see how I liked the new (to me at that time) IMI M855. I found the GGG to be
very close to the M855 Israeli. I don't have a chrono, we were shooting at the swinging steel targets Wideners is selling. POI of IMI vs GGG was close enough to ring the bell consistantly at 110yds.
It was consistant, clean and on par with the IMI. Off topic but Wideners has the M855 IMI on sale $390 for 1200rd case.
Molon: I second the motion for your review of the GGG. If you're game, IM me, I'll donate a box.
Link Posted: 8/12/2010 3:54:47 PM EDT
GGG 62 gr groups better that the IMI.
Link Posted: 8/12/2010 6:07:28 PM EDT

Originally Posted By dropd57:
GGG 62 gr groups better that the IMI.

pics?
Link Posted: 8/12/2010 6:58:53 PM EDT
No pictures but it grouped better than the IMI for me. Rifle used was a 13.7", 1:7 twist, Noveske Infidel.
Link Posted: 9/6/2010 5:23:58 PM EDT
I found it to shoot clean and accuracy was on par with some old Spanish SS109 I've had on hand for a long time. For the price, however, the accuracy really wasn't all that great.

I've still got about 150rds of it, and I intend to do some chrony work to get some comparative data. I have some IMI M855 to compare it to as well but I'm not sure when I'll get around to that though. The rifle I was shooting is a new M16A4 clone I put together so it's strictly a service type rifle. I need to get it shot in some I think because 2-3 MOA performance is not at all what I was expecting. Maybe it was the ammo, but I'm betting it was a little of both.

Expensive stuff for sure, but it definately has a bit of bark behind it. Definately not a commercial muzzle report.


Saleen
Link Posted: 9/7/2010 3:56:06 AM EDT
I'd love to get some in the ammo can. But its just too expensive just to put holes in paper.
Top Top