Quoted: Hello,
People lump the BH 55gr FMJ blue box in with XM193 and I'd like to know why. Obviously it is a similar weight bullet.Which of the two is better for a SHTF situation? The costs are pretty close, so why one over the other, especially if XM193 are "seconds?"
|
Who are these people?
The difference is - BH does not have a sealed primer, bullet, and typically not crimped or not crimped to the degree M193 is. But the biggest difference is velocity. M193 needs to be able to maintain 3250fps out of a 20" barrel.
www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=3&f=16&t=273003My results comparing M193 to BH 55gr... out of a 16" carbine:
Q3131A (2005)
3194
3198
3203
3176
3191
AVG: 3192
Black Hills 55grFMJ
2997
3025
2966
2945
2994
AVG: 2985
Black Hills is one of the slowest 55gr rounds I tested, only Wolf Russian steel case 55gr was slower. Since velocity is a factor in fragementation, this BH 55gr is not as desireable for SHTF engagements. That being said - since you need to maintain above 2700fps for reliable fragmentation, this still would be acceptable ammunition for close quarters enagements, which civilians would be more likely to encounter. All things being equal, I will take real M193, thanks.
Second question: Is there an advantage to the 55gr FMJ over the Hornady 75gr TAP other than a lower price? Would you not rather have 1000 rounds of 75gr TAP as opposed to 55gr XM193 or similar?
|
In most cases - yes. The TAP is just proven more effective in gel testing. Now - will it really make THAT much difference in your life and death situation? My guess is not. But there is nothing wrong with wanting the *best* ammunition for stopping a threat to you and your family. We do it for our handguns, why wouldn't we apply the same theory to our rifles?
That being said, having seen all the data out there, and acknowledging there are better rounds, including the 77 and 75gr TAP, I am very comfortable using M193 out of my 16" and 20" weapons for defense.