Quoted:
Thanks a ton Mike! I've been having trouble getting any accurate finds with the search engine on this site. Doesn't work like most BB's.
Can you use Gem-Tech's distributor list?? They have a company listed here in Austin under that list....so if they installed it would the Gem-Tech warranty carry over??
Also, on a first build....without yet having any sort of Lvl II permit for the Gem-tech, would you recommend just going with a Vortex and then getting the bi-lock after you were accepted for the Lvl II license to hold the M4-96D?? Seems like that would be a smarter move just in case....
Max
View Quote
Max, I suggest calling Gemtech directly to ask them about licensed distributors mounting the Bilock for use with a suppressor. In general Phil told me they prefer the Colt or Bushy barrels (that was some years ago, they may accept others no) no shorter than 11.5". They will mount it on a shorter barrel, but may not warranty it.
If you are not real close to buying and getting the paperwork done on the M4-96D, or any other can for that matter, I would personally stick on the Vortex - it's just outrageously effective. Once you get the FH/Suppressor setup of your choice, swap. You can keep the Vortex for another rifle, or easily sell it. They are so good I RARELY see anyone wanting to sell theirs.
However, that's just me. If you are really budget conscious, go ahead and get the bilock. Don't even worry about Gemtech mounting it until you get the M4-96D. If you get the money to buy that can, you will surely be able to afford Gemtech remounting the Bilock for you, it's well worth it for the warranty. If Gemtech mounts the bilock and blesses it, they will fix just about ANYTHING bad that happens from the bilock forward, even if it's your fault.
P.S. I agree, I think the search function sucks on this board, I want to be able to search thread content as the thread titles are not always indicative of post content. However, some search function is better than none. And since non-members don't even get to have the search function, I forgive them quite a bit for repeat threads. (Hear that, DevL? [;D]