User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 10/12/2017 2:02:51 AM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 1811:
Anyone use or see a Colt 10.3 factory barrel (with markings) in a heavy socom version? |
|
|
|
KS, USA
|
Posted: 10/12/2017 5:05:53 PM EDT
[Last Edit: CMP1194]
[#2]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By DwayneHicks:
 That is exactly what I am going for. For the time being gave up finding an old Surefire FA 212 can.... but that rifle with and atpial IS my exact planned build. Thank you for the motivation!My apologies, I was unaware. |
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 10/12/2017 9:20:18 PM EDT
[#3]
Built up from recent Brownells DD MK18 stripped upper. Obviously not clone correct but I love it and it meets my needs.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/12/2017 9:27:47 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Gunfighter236:
Built up from recent Brownells DD MK18 stripped upper. Obviously not clone correct but I love it and it meets my needs. https://i.imgur.com/LuH6j0o.jpg 
Still got me scratching my head as to why they switched to a plastic dust cover on a URG they put out to mimic the issued CQBR |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/12/2017 9:47:52 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MILSPEC556:
Nice build man, looks close enough to me. Definitely needs a standard dust cover tho
Still got me scratching my head as to why they switched to a plastic dust cover on a URG they put out to mimic the issued CQBR Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MILSPEC556:
Originally Posted By Gunfighter236:
Built up from recent Brownells DD MK18 stripped upper. Obviously not clone correct but I love it and it meets my needs. https://i.imgur.com/LuH6j0o.jpg
Still got me scratching my head as to why they switched to a plastic dust cover on a URG they put out to mimic the issued CQBR 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/12/2017 10:12:14 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By SecretSquirell:
Have you seen their "version" of the Mk12? They don't know clone. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By SecretSquirell:
Originally Posted By MILSPEC556:
Originally Posted By Gunfighter236:
Built up from recent Brownells DD MK18 stripped upper. Obviously not clone correct but I love it and it meets my needs. https://i.imgur.com/LuH6j0o.jpg
Still got me scratching my head as to why they switched to a plastic dust cover on a URG they put out to mimic the issued CQBR 
Can't tell if zero effort given or zero fucks given. Id like to think they know what parts are actually on the issued guns they supply parts for |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/12/2017 10:20:34 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MILSPEC556:
I (probably purposely) forgot about that thing. And not to mention the "M4A1 SOCOM" upper Brownells has for sale/pictured with the plastic dust cover and a mid length barrel.
Can't tell if zero effort given or zero fucks given. Id like to think they know what parts are actually on the issued guns they supply parts for |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/12/2017 10:22:56 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MILSPEC556:
I (probably purposely) forgot about that thing. And not to mention the "M4A1 SOCOM" upper Brownells has for sale/pictured with the plastic dust cover and a mid length barrel.
Can't tell if zero effort given or zero fucks given. Id like to think they know what parts are actually on the issued guns they supply parts for Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MILSPEC556:
Originally Posted By SecretSquirell:
Originally Posted By MILSPEC556:
Originally Posted By Gunfighter236:
Built up from recent Brownells DD MK18 stripped upper. Obviously not clone correct but I love it and it meets my needs. https://i.imgur.com/LuH6j0o.jpg
Still got me scratching my head as to why they switched to a plastic dust cover on a URG they put out to mimic the issued CQBR
Can't tell if zero effort given or zero fucks given. Id like to think they know what parts are actually on the issued guns they supply parts for |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/12/2017 10:55:29 PM EDT
[#9]
I don't understand the whole plastic port cover thing, either. Changing out that goofy bastard was the first thing I did.
Just a random desert shooting report, I put 11 mags through the DD Mk18 SOCOM upper a few days ago using a 4oz T2 buffer, and not a hiccup. Fired Wolf WPA 55gr .223, AE 55gr .223 and tested out some Hornady Black 75gr 5.56 as well. I used my last spare tungsten weight to turn the H2 into an H3 in my bastard Mod 0, so I couldn't try out an H2. I ordered a complete H2 from Damage Industries during the sale recently, so I'll give it a good workout with that next time. Weight on the Damage Industries H2 is more like 4.55oz and not 4.6, but close enough I suppose. |
|
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 10/12/2017 11:16:28 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Gunfighter236]
[#10]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MILSPEC556:
Nice build man, looks close enough to me. Definitely needs a standard dust cover tho
Still got me scratching my head as to why they switched to a plastic dust cover on a URG they put out to mimic the issued CQBR Only about 400 rounds thru it so far running G Super 42 weighted up to H2 with no problems and 4-430 ejection. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/12/2017 11:19:19 PM EDT
[Last Edit: DontBuryMe]
[#11]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Gunfighter236:
Bro, I spent an hour trying pull the poly cover off and replace it but could not get the damn thing off. Could not for the life of me get the pin out far enough. Not sure what the problem was but it seemed to be hanging up early on the forward assist. Maybe one of these days I’ll work on it again but for now it’s ran great as is. Only about 400 rounds thru it so far running G Super 42 weighted up to H2 with no problems and 4-430 ejection. ETA: Although you should be able to slide it far enough rearward to swap the cover... hmm. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/12/2017 11:51:24 PM EDT
[#12]
I took mine out backwards, towards the RE. It was tight, and if I recall I either taped the FA to keep it from scratching or I put a cleaning patch between the pin and FA. It seems like it won't clear the FA at first, but you kind of have to angle it downwards and it will just barely slip past it enough to remove the door. I didn't remove the pin completely, just enough to swap the door.
|
|
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 10/12/2017 11:55:07 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By krdt:
I took mine out backwards, towards the RE. It was tight, and if I recall I either taped the FA to keep it from scratching or I put a cleaning patch between the pin and FA. It seems like it won't clear the FA at first, but you kind of have to angle it downwards and it will just barely slip past it enough to remove the door. I didn't remove the pin completely, just enough to swap the door. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/13/2017 1:34:53 AM EDT
[#14]
Got the brownells upper this morning, gutted it and replaced the rail on my first SBR. Not entirely clone correct, but close enough for what I like.
Before.  Attached FileAfter.  Attached File |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/13/2017 7:40:29 AM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By fridge72:
Got the brownells upper this morning, gutted it and replaced the rail on my first SBR. Not entirely clone correct, but close enough for what I like. Before. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/318446/4EAC6FE8-FFBF-4EFF-89CF-5E92CC030C1F-332093.JPG After. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/318446/116D2E3D-FDC0-435A-AF00-414853D60D78-332094.JPG |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 10/13/2017 8:25:51 AM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Gunfighter236:
Built up from recent Brownells DD MK18 stripped upper. Obviously not clone correct but I love it and it meets my needs. https://i.imgur.com/LuH6j0o.jpg Are you nitpicking things like Gen2 stock Vs Gen1? Or do you mean the upper itself? I thought it was confirmed that DD had provided complete .070 uppers to the MIL? To me, your rifle seems like at close at it can be without being full on COLT or FN. |
|
|
TX, USA
|
Posted: 10/13/2017 9:13:17 AM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Roadblock:
Why is this not "clone correct"? Are you nitpicking things like Gen2 stock Vs Gen1? Or do you mean the upper itself? I thought it was confirmed that DD had provided complete .070 uppers to the MIL? To me, your rifle seems like at close at it can be without being full on COLT or FN.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/13/2017 9:26:48 AM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Roadblock:
Why is this not "clone correct"? Are you nitpicking things like Gen2 stock Vs Gen1? Or do you mean the upper itself? I thought it was confirmed that DD had provided complete .070 uppers to the MIL? To me, your rifle seems like at close at it can be without being full on COLT or FN. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Roadblock:
Originally Posted By Gunfighter236:
Built up from recent Brownells DD MK18 stripped upper. Obviously not clone correct but I love it and it meets my needs. https://i.imgur.com/LuH6j0o.jpg Are you nitpicking things like Gen2 stock Vs Gen1? Or do you mean the upper itself? I thought it was confirmed that DD had provided complete .070 uppers to the MIL? To me, your rifle seems like at close at it can be without being full on COLT or FN.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/13/2017 9:27:33 AM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By walkinginadangerzone:
Here we go again. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By walkinginadangerzone:
Originally Posted By Roadblock:
Why is this not "clone correct"? Are you nitpicking things like Gen2 stock Vs Gen1? Or do you mean the upper itself? I thought it was confirmed that DD had provided complete .070 uppers to the MIL? To me, your rifle seems like at close at it can be without being full on COLT or FN. 
|
|
|
|
IN, USA
|
Posted: 10/13/2017 10:00:27 AM EDT
[Last Edit: aaron580]
[#20]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By SecretSquirell:
https://media.giphy.com/media/YPIrsRqqO7oB2/giphy.gif 
I am working on MK18s, just in the parts gathering phase. Got cans first like I should have done with the mk12
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/13/2017 12:24:36 PM EDT
[#21]
so im sure its been covered before but i cant find it...im either blind or stupid...maybe both.
Got another mk18 upper and it has the bigger gas port, combined with a surefire rc2 which buffer do you suggest i get for it? h2 or h3? Wont be able to shoot it to find out for a week or so 
|
|
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 10/13/2017 12:46:25 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Gunfighter236]
[#22]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Roadblock:
Why is this not "clone correct"? Are you nitpicking things like Gen2 stock Vs Gen1? Or do you mean the upper itself? I thought it was confirmed that DD had provided complete .070 uppers to the MIL? To me, your rifle seems like at close at it can be without being full on COLT or FN. Specifically for me is the lower is BCM as I don’t own any Colt SBR lowers and also the dust cover. As far as small parts/accessories those are always interchangeable. Spent 8 years in the infantry and not everything “as issued” met my needs and was replaced by personal purchases. I don’t look at some of those items as being “correct” just because they are issue. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/13/2017 1:10:49 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By SecretSquirell:
He's far closer than other folks that have posted their "clones". And I have a 100% clone correct upper rg (used TC's guide on Page 1 for parts for my block 1) and all i hear is that the rattle can job sucks.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/13/2017 5:59:50 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Jlgil73]
[#24]
I found these photos from of an ex Seal Team 4 member that gave me permission to use them on here.
Looks like block 1 moving to 1.5. I was surprised to see the Surefire M900. I dont think these have been on here. When I asked him if I could post them, he didn't even know what arfcom is . there are a lot of others, but these are the cqbr photos I was able to find.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/13/2017 7:34:18 PM EDT
[#25]
Man, I want that corn cob.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/14/2017 12:00:51 AM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Jlgil73:
I found these photos from of an ex Seal Team 4 member that gave me permission to use them on here. Looks like block 1 moving to 1.5. I was surprised to see the Surefire M900. I dont think these have been on here. When I asked him if I could post them, he didn't even know what arfcom is . there are a lot of others, but these are the cqbr photos I was able to find.
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4477/37630639296_74a08c4ec8_o.jpg https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4477/37646850792_9d31dcde14_o.jpg https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4446/37646831522_6130c25dbc_o.jpg https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4504/36969443644_6637004c11_o.jpg https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4496/36969414214_96bfee9fc4_o.jpg |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/14/2017 1:51:44 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By JohnnySasaki20:
SBR Thread Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By JohnnySasaki20:
Originally Posted By fridge72:
Got the brownells upper this morning, gutted it and replaced the rail on my first SBR. Not entirely clone correct, but close enough for what I like. Before. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/318446/4EAC6FE8-FFBF-4EFF-89CF-5E92CC030C1F-332093.JPG After. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/318446/116D2E3D-FDC0-435A-AF00-414853D60D78-332094.JPG |
|
|
|
OK, USA
|
Posted: 10/14/2017 2:19:50 AM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Jlgil73:
I found these photos from of an ex Seal Team 4 member that gave me permission to use them on here. Looks like block 1 moving to 1.5. I was surprised to see the Surefire M900. I dont think these have been on here. When I asked him if I could post them, he didn't even know what arfcom is . there are a lot of others, but these are the cqbr photos I was able to find.
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4477/37630639296_74a08c4ec8_o.jpg https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4477/37646850792_9d31dcde14_o.jpg https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4446/37646831522_6130c25dbc_o.jpg https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4504/36969443644_6637004c11_o.jpg https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4496/36969414214_96bfee9fc4_o.jpg |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/14/2017 1:28:12 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Jlgil73:
I found these photos from of an ex Seal Team 4 member that gave me permission to use them on here. Looks like block 1 moving to 1.5. I was surprised to see the Surefire M900. I dont think these have been on here. When I asked him if I could post them, he didn't even know what arfcom is . there are a lot of others, but these are the cqbr photos I was able to find.
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4477/37630639296_74a08c4ec8_o.jpg https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4477/37646850792_9d31dcde14_o.jpg https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4446/37646831522_6130c25dbc_o.jpg https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4504/36969443644_6637004c11_o.jpg https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4496/36969414214_96bfee9fc4_o.jpg |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/14/2017 1:36:34 PM EDT
[Last Edit: JJREA]
[#30]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Gunslinger97:
Is.....is that a block 1.5 with an A1/2 stock in the first pic? And in the rest of the pics, OH my LORD tons of AA eotechs. No way.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/14/2017 1:47:15 PM EDT
[Last Edit: DontBuryMe]
[#31]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Alaskanforfreedom:
Far left second to last pic is that 2 mags with a clamp? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/14/2017 2:01:31 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Gunslinger97:
Is.....is that a block 1.5 with an A1/2 stock in the first pic? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Gunslinger97:
Originally Posted By Jlgil73:
I found these photos from of an ex Seal Team 4 member that gave me permission to use them on here. Looks like block 1 moving to 1.5. I was surprised to see the Surefire M900. I dont think these have been on here. When I asked him if I could post them, he didn't even know what arfcom is . there are a lot of others, but these are the cqbr photos I was able to find.
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4477/37630639296_74a08c4ec8_o.jpg https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4477/37646850792_9d31dcde14_o.jpg https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4446/37646831522_6130c25dbc_o.jpg https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4504/36969443644_6637004c11_o.jpg https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4496/36969414214_96bfee9fc4_o.jpg |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/14/2017 3:21:49 PM EDT
[#33]
Any more good Brownells codes for the DD mk18 uppers? Last I saw was $35 off. Shouldn't have dragged my feet last time.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/14/2017 3:38:37 PM EDT
[#34]
Best code I see at the moment is $20 off (H7L) plus 4% off with Active Junky. Of course another $10 off that if you get invited to AJ. So around $690 to $700. Still not a bad deal - it's less than I paid for mine :\.
|
|
|
|
NC, USA
|
Posted: 10/14/2017 4:09:06 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Lawdog-1]
[#35]
An Ex US NAVY SEAL is a SEAL Kickout the SEALS Teams. A Retired SEAL is a US NAVY SEAL got in his 20 years or didn't Reeup with the US NAVY when he came time to reenlist in the US NAVY. I am not being a smart ass. I saw or Read this from a retired US NAVY SEAL Team member who was very firm about clearing that statement up.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/14/2017 4:21:36 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Lawdog-1:
An Ex US NAVY SEAL is a SEAL Kickout the SEALS Teams. A Retired SEAL is a US NAVY SEAL got in his 20 years or didn't Reeup with the US NAVY when he came time to reenlist in the US NAVY. I am not being a smart ass. I saw or Read this from a retired US NAVY SEAL Team member who was very firm about clearing that statement up. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/14/2017 4:34:17 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Lawdog-1:
An Ex US NAVY SEAL is a SEAL Kickout the SEALS Teams. A Retired SEAL is a US NAVY SEAL got in his 20 years or didn't Reeup with the US NAVY when he came time to reenlist in the US NAVY. I am not being a smart ass. I saw or Read this from a retired US NAVY SEAL Team member who was very firm about clearing that statement up.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/14/2017 4:50:13 PM EDT
[#38]
Do SEALs get together and work out these specific technical terms, or is it just something guys on the internet worry about? I can see them all sitting around a conference table with their lawyers, "Now, in reference to the 4th clause in Article 3, one may only refer to oneself as 'retired' if the requirements in subsection F are met, otherwise, and in keeping with the specified amendments to paragraph 3, subsection B, they shall only use the term 'Ex' or 'Former', unless specifically exempt as outlined in... All in favor?"
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/14/2017 4:59:25 PM EDT
[Last Edit: MILSPEC556]
[#39]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By krdt:
Do SEALs get together and work out these specific technical terms, or is it just something guys on the internet worry about? I can see them all sitting around a conference table with their lawyers, "Now, in reference to the 4th clause in Article 3, one may only refer to oneself as 'retired' if the requirements in subsection F are met, otherwise, and in keeping with the specified amendments to paragraph 3, subsection B, they shall only use the term 'Ex' or 'Former', unless specifically exempt as outlined in... All in favor?"
Time to get back back to CQBR's. Or clones of retired CQBR's. Ex CQBR clones?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/14/2017 5:00:06 PM EDT
[#40]
On a separate note, I think I was #cloneblocked for the foreseeable future when my 8 year old got up during breakfast, went and pulled my ATPIAL-C out, put in on the kitchen table, and said "how much does this part cost daddy?"
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/14/2017 5:03:12 PM EDT
[Last Edit: rlex]
[#41]
You are retired from the US NAVY when you get your retirement orders whether you are a SEAL or not - there is not some divine or immaculate event for them. Ugh....if I thought I was in GD when I read this.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/14/2017 5:28:07 PM EDT
[Last Edit: DontBuryMe]
[#42]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Lawdog-1:
An Ex US NAVY SEAL is a SEAL Kickout the SEALS Teams. A Retired SEAL is a US NAVY SEAL got in his 20 years or didn't Reeup with the US NAVY when he came time to reenlist in the US NAVY. I am not being a smart ass. I saw or Read this from a retired US NAVY SEAL Team member who was very firm about clearing that statement up. 
Guys that do 10 years and choose to get out are not retired, and "ex" is commonly interchanged with "former". You know what he means. We all know what he means. No need to make it into an issue. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/14/2017 8:39:12 PM EDT
[#43]
Well here's my CQBP, gotta stop being lazy and stamp the lower someday. just bought a g33 for the T1 so I can aim with a comma. They look surprisingly good pared together. Other than the lower, all upper parts are correct down to roll pins.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/14/2017 8:52:19 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Blackfoot_7]
[#44]
Does anyone know if there's a low profile riser that's a match for the Wilcox low profile front sight riser in terms of height? Looking at the YHM but it looks to be a bit too high. I know the short answer is to contact Wilcox direct to see if they'll sell the front riser by itself, but looking to get some input from the group first. Thanks.
Wilcox Low Profile Front Riser (lower right): 
YHM Front Sight Riser (clearly too high): 
Then there's the YHM GB front sight riser (looks like it might be a good match): 
What I'm ultimately trying to achieve in terms of riser compatibility (MK18 inspired SBR): 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/15/2017 12:36:41 AM EDT
[Last Edit: WUPHF]
[#45]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/15/2017 3:29:54 AM EDT
[Last Edit: demoMouse]
[#46]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Lawdog-1:
An Ex US NAVY SEAL is a SEAL Kickout the SEALS Teams. A Retired SEAL is a US NAVY SEAL got in his 20 years or didn't Reeup with the US NAVY when he came time to reenlist in the US NAVY. I am not being a smart ass. I saw or Read this from a retired US NAVY SEAL Team member who was very firm about clearing that statement up. Why do you keep caps-locking NAVY? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/15/2017 3:47:16 AM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NickOTime:
Mine too, with the larue carbine length rail. I know not technically correct, but IIRC there were some on a couple 14.5's in the Block II or PR thread somewhere.
I actually had mine in that config w/ larue rail before I hacked up a RISII FSP. That build is why i bought my 553. I don't think I have any pics though. Still got the larue rail and a 16" Colt Socom FSGB that needs to be chopped. But I got too many projects to pursue that atm. Thanks for planting that seed BOONEA...
ETA: I stand corrected, page 433: https://farm1.staticflickr.com/292/20358419891_c23c97fd7a_o.jpg 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/15/2017 3:58:57 AM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Dejavu:
Forgive my ignorance, but why are the 99051s backwards?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/15/2017 4:06:17 AM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By ShaneWang:
Well here's my CQBP, gotta stop being lazy and stamp the lower someday. just bought a g33 for the T1 so I can aim with a comma. They look surprisingly good pared together. Other than the lower, all upper parts are correct down to roll pins. https://i.imgur.com/LqXaEsm.jpg just curious, didnt the ATF say they would slap your peepee if you modify the shockwave brace? its what im using and the cheekweld sucks...and i definitely wouldnt know how it feels when shouldered..... also posted earlier but it got buried under all the "ex vs retired vs former SEAL" talk out of nowhere, new mk18 build happening, has larger gas port and suppressed, think i should go ahead and get a h2 buffer for it? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/15/2017 4:41:05 AM EDT
[Last Edit: krdt]
[#50]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By RJeff21:
So it begins (again)...... Back from ADCO with a little fresh paint. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/294984/0ACE47E8-3517-41F4-AC25-5C7E8D96BFA9-333661.JPG Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By RJeff21:
So it begins (again)...... Back from ADCO with a little fresh paint. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/294984/0ACE47E8-3517-41F4-AC25-5C7E8D96BFA9-333661.JPG Originally Posted By Jormungandr:
also posted earlier but it got buried under all the "ex vs retired vs former SEAL" talk out of nowhere, new mk18 build happening, has larger gas port and suppressed, think i should go ahead and get a h2 buffer for it? |
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
Attached File
