User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 11:05:42 PM EDT
[#1]
SEALs during Balikatan 22
 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/13/2022 2:16:10 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TinyCrumb: Thx dude, appreciate it. I honestly forgot that I used those, but you're right, I do remember picking a few up like 10 years ago and put them on some of my lowers. I think at the time I was frustrated with 4-position tubes because the sopmod stock is so long that with kit on I needed a position between 1 and 2. They've just sort of been on my lowers ever since. They do seem to fit most of my stocks pretty well. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/13/2022 3:45:12 PM EDT
[Last Edit: TCBA_Joe]
[#3]
Bunch of MK18 MOD 0 porn here
IG link |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/13/2022 5:37:35 PM EDT
[#4]
Still some more work to do but is coming along
 Also, day 84 for SF Socom eFile, so hope to have that soon.  Attached File |
|
|
|
AZ, USA
|
Posted: 5/13/2022 8:12:46 PM EDT
[Last Edit: AZ_SBR]
[#5]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TinyCrumb: Thx dude, appreciate it. I honestly forgot that I used those, but you're right, I do remember picking a few up like 10 years ago and put them on some of my lowers. I think at the time I was frustrated with 4-position tubes because the sopmod stock is so long that with kit on I needed a position between 1 and 2. They've just sort of been on my lowers ever since. They do seem to fit most of my stocks pretty well. Joined the Teflon gray gang today. The fit and finish is so nice compared to my Colt 4-position receiver extension. No more slop in the stock; snug fitment like God intended it. And yes, that's a Damage Industries enhanced spring because "SPROING!" is annoying.  
|
|
|
PA, USA
|
Posted: 5/14/2022 1:29:26 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryVery elegant. A weapon for a more civilzed time. |
|
|
AZ, USA
|
Posted: 5/14/2022 3:00:46 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Novak: Very elegant. A weapon for a more civilzed time. Anything less would be uncivilized.
|
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 5/14/2022 3:49:21 PM EDT
[#8]
One of my favorite setups...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2022 5:16:27 PM EDT
[#9]
Sighted it in today. Not an exact clone, but close enough for me. Need to figure out a light and then decide on an optic. Pockets aren't deep enough for an elcan.
 Attached File |
|
|
|
IN, USA
|
Posted: 5/15/2022 10:34:45 PM EDT
[#10]
Colt 10.3 barrels are onsale on midway $179 only 17 left.
|
|
|
VA, USA
|
Posted: 5/15/2022 11:11:37 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By BlueDevilBrew: One of my favorite setups... https://i.postimg.cc/V6SPHV0J/IMG-3655.jpg Every time I see a setup like this I want to ditch my elcan for it, but afterwards I'll see an elcan setup and want to go back to it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2022 11:20:03 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By apocalypserisin: Every time I see a setup like this I want to ditch my elcan for it, but afterwards I'll see an elcan setup and want to go back to it. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By apocalypserisin: Originally Posted By BlueDevilBrew: One of my favorite setups... https://i.postimg.cc/V6SPHV0J/IMG-3655.jpg Every time I see a setup like this I want to ditch my elcan for it, but afterwards I'll see an elcan setup and want to go back to it. |
|
|
|
IA, USA
|
Posted: 5/15/2022 11:31:20 PM EDT
[#13]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/16/2022 1:13:51 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By JLAudio: Members of U.S. Naval Special Warfare Task Unit Europe (NSWTU-E) gear up for night-time DA (Direct Action) training alongside Croatian SOFCOM – Zapovjedništvo specijalnih snaga (ZSS) during Exercise Trojan Footprint 22 in Split, Croatia, May 8, 2022 https://i.imgur.com/OiO9033.jpg https://i.imgur.com/Bp56L3M.jpg https://i.imgur.com/nUuZVWo.jpg Streamlight ProTac Rail Mount 2 in the first pic? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/16/2022 1:43:28 AM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Weasel_Master: Sighted it in today. Not an exact clone, but close enough for me. Need to figure out a light and then decide on an optic. Pockets aren't deep enough for an elcan. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/78037/20220514_153228_jpg-2383822.JPG I would suggest either a T1 or T2. CD |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/16/2022 11:55:52 AM EDT
[#16]
Guys, I havent been as active on this thread lately due to me
Old Pic... 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/16/2022 8:19:48 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TigerHawk: https://i.imgur.com/T8IKoeE.jpg @TigerHawk Can you estimate how much the set up weighs like it is in the picture? Thanks Bronc |
|
|
|
IA, USA
|
Posted: 5/17/2022 9:31:41 AM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 77Bronc: @TigerHawk Can you estimate how much the set up weighs like it is in the picture? Thanks Bronc Around 10lbs on the bathroom scale. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/17/2022 12:24:12 PM EDT
[#19]
With 77s and sling included, 10lbs, 15.5oz
|
|
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 5/17/2022 1:26:14 PM EDT
[#20]
PRI gas buster or Geissele ACH?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/17/2022 2:23:04 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Combat_Diver: I would suggest either a T1 or T2. CD I appreciate the recommendation. I was on the fence about an EOTech but the battery life and reliability of the Aimpoints are important to me. I can see the severe benefit of an RC2 in enclosed spaces. Shooting this under my covered range was quite a decent concussion. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/17/2022 2:36:06 PM EDT
[#22]
The date went well... We picked up right where we left off...
 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/18/2022 3:51:12 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Dyzastr]
[#23]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By AstraPat: Streamlight ProTac Rail Mount 2 in the first pic? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By AstraPat: Originally Posted By JLAudio: Members of U.S. Naval Special Warfare Task Unit Europe (NSWTU-E) gear up for night-time DA (Direct Action) training alongside Croatian SOFCOM Zapovjednitvo specijalnih snaga (ZSS) during Exercise Trojan Footprint 22 in Split, Croatia, May 8, 2022 https://i.imgur.com/OiO9033.jpg https://i.imgur.com/Bp56L3M.jpg https://i.imgur.com/nUuZVWo.jpg Streamlight ProTac Rail Mount 2 in the first pic? Originally Posted By Combat_Diver: Originally Posted By Weasel_Master: Sighted it in today. Not an exact clone, but close enough for me. Need to figure out a light and then decide on an optic. Pockets aren't deep enough for an elcan. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/78037/20220514_153228_jpg-2383822.JPG I would suggest either a T1 or T2. CD Originally Posted By Jlgil73:The date went well... We picked up right where we left off... https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52080556911_a90f973565_k.jpg https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52080557668_025e5b0ae1_k.jpg |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 5/18/2022 3:59:07 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Dyzastr: I've been seeing some great deals on used T1's. I'm considering going this route. I recently replaced the eotech on mine with a t1 for the battery life. Only bad thing I have to say about the t1 is you don't get a very clear dot if you use a magnifier behind it. |
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 5/19/2022 3:20:01 PM EDT
[#25]
Can’t seem to find it. Which is more “correct” for a CQBR lower, the square or the rectangle UID?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2022 7:26:37 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By skywalkindude: Can't seem to find it. Which is more "correct" for a CQBR lower, the square or the rectangle UID? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2022 9:36:34 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By skywalkindude: Can’t seem to find it. Which is more “correct” for a CQBR lower, the square or the rectangle UID? Depends. The rectangle is usually associated with USASOC guns and the square MARSOC. I'm not sure if that's a hard and fast rule, but I can't recall ever seeing an Army-style rectangle on any clearly MARSOC guns. I've got a square on both my Block IIs and a custom-sized rectangle on my Block I (to mimic some old UIDs I've seen on Army depot serviced lowers/guns). The square on my NT4 host Block II would be the correct one, but at the time I put the square on my RC host, I wasn't really thinking about or concerned over whether it was branch-specific -- I just went with the style I preferred. In hindsight, I probably should've done an Army-style rectangle; I've got one for it, but I've yet to feel the motivation to change it, heh. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2022 11:59:39 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By krdt: Depends. The rectangle is usually associated with USASOC guns and the square MARSOC. I'm not sure if that's a hard and fast rule, but I can't recall ever seeing an Army-style rectangle on any clearly MARSOC guns. I've got a square on both my Block IIs and a custom-sized rectangle on my Block I (to mimic some old UIDs I've seen on Army depot serviced lowers/guns). The square on my NT4 host Block II would be the correct one, but at the time I put the square on my RC host, I wasn't really thinking about or concerned over whether it was branch-specific -- I just went with the style I preferred. In hindsight, I probably should've done an Army-style rectangle; I've got one for it, but I've yet to feel the motivation to change it, heh. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/20/2022 1:15:40 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By mdavis: Good reading for those of you with Warcomps who shoot with a RC/RC2 who haven't been aware of this topic from almost a year ago. https://pewscience.com/sound-signature-reviews-free/sss-6-52-surefire-556rc2-mk18-556 ETA: For the TL;DR crowd, if you shoot suppressed the majority of the time, ditch the Warcomp and get the FH (or brake). Thank you for highlighting my work. I hope it is useful for the community at large. Jay PEW Science |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/20/2022 7:30:29 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By krdt: Depends. The rectangle is usually associated with USASOC guns and the square MARSOC. I'm not sure if that's a hard and fast rule, but I can't recall ever seeing an Army-style rectangle on any clearly MARSOC guns. I've got a square on both my Block IIs and a custom-sized rectangle on my Block I (to mimic some old UIDs I've seen on Army depot serviced lowers/guns). The square on my NT4 host Block II would be the correct one, but at the time I put the square on my RC host, I wasn't really thinking about or concerned over whether it was branch-specific -- I just went with the style I preferred. In hindsight, I probably should've done an Army-style rectangle; I've got one for it, but I've yet to feel the motivation to change it, heh.  Attached File |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/20/2022 8:01:13 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By LsuJon: From the marine corps museum, popped up in the clone group on FB at the right time lol. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/316069/5077EEF1-8779-4AF4-A158-DCDE60AC4319_jpe-2391035.JPG Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By LsuJon: Originally Posted By krdt: Depends. The rectangle is usually associated with USASOC guns and the square MARSOC. I'm not sure if that's a hard and fast rule, but I can't recall ever seeing an Army-style rectangle on any clearly MARSOC guns. I've got a square on both my Block IIs and a custom-sized rectangle on my Block I (to mimic some old UIDs I've seen on Army depot serviced lowers/guns). The square on my NT4 host Block II would be the correct one, but at the time I put the square on my RC host, I wasn't really thinking about or concerned over whether it was branch-specific -- I just went with the style I preferred. In hindsight, I probably should've done an Army-style rectangle; I've got one for it, but I've yet to feel the motivation to change it, heh. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/316069/5077EEF1-8779-4AF4-A158-DCDE60AC4319_jpe-2391035.JPG Did they weld the upper and lower together? 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/20/2022 8:11:26 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By SecretSquirell: Did they weld the upper and lower together?  per OP of the original post, MARSOC did that before turning over the rifle. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/20/2022 8:17:29 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By LsuJon: Why yes, yes they did per OP of the original post, MARSOC did that before turning over the rifle. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By LsuJon: Originally Posted By SecretSquirell: Did they weld the upper and lower together? per OP of the original post, MARSOC did that before turning over the rifle. I'll bet there's no BCG in it. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/20/2022 11:52:29 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Dyzastr]
[#34]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By joegoos: I recently replaced the eotech on mine with a t1 for the battery life. Only bad thing I have to say about the t1 is you don't get a very clear dot if you use a magnifier behind it. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By joegoos: Originally Posted By Dyzastr: I've been seeing some great deals on used T1's. I'm considering going this route. I recently replaced the eotech on mine with a t1 for the battery life. Only bad thing I have to say about the t1 is you don't get a very clear dot if you use a magnifier behind it. Originally Posted By LsuJon: Originally Posted By krdt: Depends. The rectangle is usually associated with USASOC guns and the square MARSOC. I'm not sure if that's a hard and fast rule, but I can't recall ever seeing an Army-style rectangle on any clearly MARSOC guns. I've got a square on both my Block IIs and a custom-sized rectangle on my Block I (to mimic some old UIDs I've seen on Army depot serviced lowers/guns). The square on my NT4 host Block II would be the correct one, but at the time I put the square on my RC host, I wasn't really thinking about or concerned over whether it was branch-specific -- I just went with the style I preferred. In hindsight, I probably should've done an Army-style rectangle; I've got one for it, but I've yet to feel the motivation to change it, heh. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/316069/5077EEF1-8779-4AF4-A158-DCDE60AC4319_jpe-2391035.JPG That elcan! |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 2:51:50 PM EDT
[#35]
Did they military ever used the black version of the Daniel Defense RIS II for the MK18? Or did they only use the FDE colour?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 3:19:05 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Semafoor: Did they military ever used the black version of the Daniel Defense RIS II for the MK18? Or did they only use the FDE colour? |
|
|
|
MO, USA
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 5:24:17 PM EDT
[#37]
How about a black RC2?
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 6:55:42 PM EDT
[Last Edit: leerx]
[#38]
Hey gang, its been a while
How rare are the Eotech SU-231a NAVSEA's now? 
|
|
|
IA, USA
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 7:48:53 PM EDT
[Last Edit: TGWLDR]
[#39]
How about a favor for a gun whore?
I'm planning a cut down on a 6921 bbl, I just wanted to confirm a dimension....looking for a measurement from the journal step ahead of the FSBGB to the shoulder where the MD seats. Tig Edit: .700" sound accurate 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 9:49:15 PM EDT
[Last Edit: FONTY]
[#40]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TGWLDR: How about a favor for a gun whore? I'm planning a cut down on a 6921 bbl, I just wanted to confirm a dimension....looking for a measurement from the journal step ahead of the FSBGB to the shoulder where the MD seats. Tig Edit: .700" sound accurate @TGWLDR Hey Tig, did a quick measurement for you and come up with roughly .370 just under 3/8. Couldn’t hold the micrometer and take pic. Lmk if you need any more measurements or pic’s.  Attached File Attached File |
|
|
|
IA, USA
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 10:00:57 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By FONTY: @TGWLDR Hey Tig, did a quick measurement for you and come up with roughly .370 just under 3/8. Couldn’t hold the micrometer and take pic. Lmk if you need any more measurements or pic’s. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/236598/7CC8E8AE-15F2-410C-BBB7-BC9A7FC5330C_jpe-2393819.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/236598/3A52E710-2464-4734-9D4F-B7EEE525820B_jpe-2393820.JPG @FONTY Thanks man, much appreciated. You're good people.  Somehow I got ahold of a drawing for a Criterion barrel with a .700" dimension and that seemed all sorts of wrong. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 10:09:17 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TGWLDR: @FONTY Thanks man, much appreciated. You're good people. Somehow I got ahold of a drawing for a Criterion barrel with a .700" dimension and that seemed all sorts of wrong. Your welcome anytime  Here’s a drawing posted here awhile back by members.  Attached File |
|
|
|
IA, USA
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 10:22:30 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By FONTY: Your welcome anytime Here’s a drawing posted here awhile back by members. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/236598/B88FE33E-FAB9-4E25-99B3-9A8611FDA800_jpe-2393855.JPG Perfect. Again, much appreciated. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 10:25:41 PM EDT
[Last Edit: krdt]
[#44]
Originally Posted By LsuJon: From the marine corps museum, popped up in the clone group on FB at the right time lol. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/316069/5077EEF1-8779-4AF4-A158-DCDE60AC4319_jpe-2391035.JPG Nice -- good to know. Extra bonus points if you can track down a square on a known USASOC gun, lol. Originally Posted By FONTY: Your welcome anytime Here’s a drawing posted here awhile back by members. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/236598/B88FE33E-FAB9-4E25-99B3-9A8611FDA800_jpe-2393855.JPG I should point out (and should've done so on the drawing) that the update was based on a factory Colt 10.3" and some measurements taken by CD -- but it's worth mentioning that DD barrels are a bit shorter and Crane cutdowns might be as well. There was a whole discussion about it, but I can't recall all the details. To cover all the bases, here is an updated drawing based on the further discussion (I can't find the original drawing from pezboytate or I'd post that as well):  Edit: Nm, found it. 
|
|
|
|
IA, USA
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 10:32:08 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By krdt: Nice -- good to know. Extra bonus points if you can track down a square on a known USASOC gun, lol. I should point out (and should've done so on the drawing) that the update was based on a factory Colt 10.3" and some measurements taken by CD -- but it's worth mentioning that DD barrels are a bit shorter and Crane cutdowns might be as well. There was a whole discussion about it, but I can't recall all the details. To cover all the bases, here is an updated drawing based on the further discussion (I can't find the original drawing from pezboytate or I'd post that as well): https://i.imgur.com/ApEkn5m.jpg Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By krdt: Originally Posted By LsuJon: From the marine corps museum, popped up in the clone group on FB at the right time lol. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/316069/5077EEF1-8779-4AF4-A158-DCDE60AC4319_jpe-2391035.JPG Nice -- good to know. Extra bonus points if you can track down a square on a known USASOC gun, lol. Originally Posted By FONTY: Your welcome anytime Here’s a drawing posted here awhile back by members. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/236598/B88FE33E-FAB9-4E25-99B3-9A8611FDA800_jpe-2393855.JPG I should point out (and should've done so on the drawing) that the update was based on a factory Colt 10.3" and some measurements taken by CD -- but it's worth mentioning that DD barrels are a bit shorter and Crane cutdowns might be as well. There was a whole discussion about it, but I can't recall all the details. To cover all the bases, here is an updated drawing based on the further discussion (I can't find the original drawing from pezboytate or I'd post that as well): https://i.imgur.com/ApEkn5m.jpg Thank you as well krdt. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 10:34:34 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By krdt: Nice -- good to know. Extra bonus points if you can track down a square on a known USASOC gun, lol. I should point out (and should've done so on the drawing) that the update was based on a factory Colt 10.3" and some measurements taken by CD -- but it's worth mentioning that DD barrels are a bit shorter and Crane cutdowns might be as well. There was a whole discussion about it, but I can't recall all the details. To cover all the bases, here is an updated drawing based on the further discussion (I can't find the original drawing from pezboytate or I'd post that as well): https://i.imgur.com/ApEkn5m.jpg Edit: Nm, found it. https://i.imgur.com/681ZKJE.png My FN SOCOM was the shortest I measured at 10.700" OAL, the DD's I measured were at 10.720" OAL. I haven't measured any CRANE cut down barrels. I haven't seen any evidence Colt 10.3"s were issued, but they were longer than the DD FWIW. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 10:36:09 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By krdt: Nice -- good to know. Extra bonus points if you can track down a square on a known USASOC gun, lol. I should point out (and should've done so on the drawing) that the update was based on a factory Colt 10.3" and some measurements taken by CD -- but it's worth mentioning that DD barrels are a bit shorter and Crane cutdowns might be as well. There was a whole discussion about it, but I can't recall all the details. To cover all the bases, here is an updated drawing based on the further discussion (I can't find the original drawing from pezboytate or I'd post that as well): https://i.imgur.com/ApEkn5m.jpg Edit: Nm, found it. https://i.imgur.com/gKkB5eY.png The bottom drawing was the initial 10.3" RIS II documentation I found. It is probable that they mistakenly down .60" for the thread length instead of .63". |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 10:45:14 PM EDT
[Last Edit: krdt]
[#48]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By pezboytate: My FN SOCOM was the shortest I measured at 10.700" OAL, the DD's I measured were at 10.720" OAL. I haven't measured any CRANE cut down barrels. I haven't seen any evidence Colt 10.3"s were issued, but they were longer than the DD FWIW. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By pezboytate: Originally Posted By krdt: Nice -- good to know. Extra bonus points if you can track down a square on a known USASOC gun, lol. I should point out (and should've done so on the drawing) that the update was based on a factory Colt 10.3" and some measurements taken by CD -- but it's worth mentioning that DD barrels are a bit shorter and Crane cutdowns might be as well. There was a whole discussion about it, but I can't recall all the details. To cover all the bases, here is an updated drawing based on the further discussion (I can't find the original drawing from pezboytate or I'd post that as well): https://i.imgur.com/ApEkn5m.jpg Edit: Nm, found it. https://i.imgur.com/681ZKJE.png My FN SOCOM was the shortest I measured at 10.700" OAL, the DD's I measured were at 10.720" OAL. I haven't measured any CRANE cut down barrels. I haven't seen any evidence Colt 10.3"s were issued, but they were longer than the DD FWIW. Ah, that's right -- I couldn't remember where I got the 10.700" OAL at the low end from. FN. I think the factory Colt was the longest and where I got the 10.75" OAL. For reference, here is a Crane cutdown next to a factory FN SOCOM (photo by CD). Looks like it'd be around the DD measurement and I'd assume they vary within the acceptable range.  Attached FileEdit: To summarize all that clone babble, lol... as long as you land somewhere between 10.70" and 10.75" OAL with a 10.35" measurement from the bolt face, you'll be good Tig. I'd probably go for the DD measurement of 10.72" if you're going to use it with a RIS II -- that'll give you a shoulder that lines up perfectly with the end of the rail. |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 5/22/2022 11:55:38 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Dyzastr: Did you get the 2moa? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Dyzastr: Originally Posted By joegoos: Originally Posted By Dyzastr: I've been seeing some great deals on used T1's. I'm considering going this route. I recently replaced the eotech on mine with a t1 for the battery life. Only bad thing I have to say about the t1 is you don't get a very clear dot if you use a magnifier behind it. Yah 2 moa. Someone did a t1 vs t2 comparison I saw that shows the t1 dot is more like a comma than a period under magnification so was aware of it when I got it. I only use a magnifier to zero and don't like how t2s look so wasn't a deal breaker for me. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2022 1:25:27 AM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By joegoos: Yah 2 moa. Someone did a t1 vs t2 comparison I saw that shows the t1 dot is more like a comma than a period under magnification so was aware of it when I got it. I only use a magnifier to zero and don't like how t2s look so wasn't a deal breaker for me. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By joegoos: Originally Posted By Dyzastr: Originally Posted By joegoos: Originally Posted By Dyzastr: I've been seeing some great deals on used T1's. I'm considering going this route. I recently replaced the eotech on mine with a t1 for the battery life. Only bad thing I have to say about the t1 is you don't get a very clear dot if you use a magnifier behind it. Yah 2 moa. Someone did a t1 vs t2 comparison I saw that shows the t1 dot is more like a comma than a period under magnification so was aware of it when I got it. I only use a magnifier to zero and don't like how t2s look so wasn't a deal breaker for me. (Not sure why had my aimpoint so close to the rear sight)  Attached File |
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
