User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 9/12/2010 4:18:20 AM EDT
[#1]
yes
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2010 4:24:10 AM EDT
[#2]
It will fit, and is considered better than a semi auto BCG by many.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2010 4:25:13 AM EDT
[#3]
Only difference in the auto carrier and a standard one is the auto carrier has more mass and as a result is heavier.......
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2010 5:50:04 AM EDT
[#4]
Quoted:
Only difference in the auto carrier and a standard one is the auto carrier has more mass and as a result is heavier....... +1 Both carrier types have same overall dimensions and are interchangeable. The cutout in the M16 carrier is smaller so it is heavier. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2010 7:08:33 AM EDT
[#5]
Quoted:
Only difference in the auto carrier and a standard one is the auto carrier has more mass and as a result is heavier....... Hey, that's a good one - 'has more mass and is heavier'. That's like 'It's more expensive and is costlier'. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2010 8:38:02 AM EDT
[#6]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Only difference in the auto carrier and a standard one is the auto carrier has more mass and as a result is heavier....... Hey, that's a good one - 'has more mass and is heavier'. That's like 'It's more expensive and is costlier'. Mass includes inertia and density... Just because it has more mass doesn't mean it's heavier, although it is the case this time. Back on topic, why would a heavier bolt carrier be considered better? Does it allow for more reliable feeding? ETA: failed at chemistry myself... |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2010 8:40:55 AM EDT
[#7]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Only difference in the auto carrier and a standard one is the auto carrier has more mass and as a result is heavier....... Hey, that's a good one - 'has more mass and is heavier'. That's like 'It's more expensive and is costlier'. Mass is weight X density... Just because it has more mass doesn't mean it's heavier, although it is the case this time. Back on topic, why would a heavier bolt carrier be considered better? Does it allow for more reliable feeding? Yes, especially in select fire weapons or rifles using heavier than standard ammunition, i.e. 64-80 grain loads. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2010 9:05:29 AM EDT
[#8]
I just like having the rifle as close as possible to the same design spec..like un notched hammers.
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
