Gay. Gay. Gay. This is extremely unpractical and exists only because of a perceived notion and is sold only for air-soft types in uniform. If you are an operator and use a Masterkey, Im not knocking you. You probably know what works for you..... My experience with underbarrel weapons has been disapointing. I hate M203's and I hate under barrel shotguns even more. I acknowledge the need for a grenade launcher though, it just interferes with being a "rifleman" in my opinion. I would much rather trust the 203 work to a designated grenadier than have me be lousy with a grenade and lousy with my rifle because it has a 203 slung under it. Underbarrel shotguns are nearly impossible to aim with...granted you aren't enaging people at 40 meters with such a
weapon, but if it has such limited use, whats the advantage of hanging on your weapon. IMO, a much better solution is to use a pistol gripped 14 or even 18.5 inch shotgun, especially with a folding stock. This will be compact enough to accomplish breaching tasks and will be usefull as a defensive weapon. Having a shotgun while clearing a house isn't only useful but its a huge advantage, especially if you are issued a 20 inch weapon. Shotguns rule CQB, provided you are opposing un-armored suspects....like third world Arabs. Remingtons new MCS is an excellent idea.
You can configure it however your mission dictates, which gives a great deal of flexibility. Added weight, limited utility and improbable hits....even against a door, make guns like the Masterkey a poor second choice to a seperate breaching weapon. The XM26 is a waste of development dollars
and effort. I can't think of one advantage something like this would offer over a Remington 18.5 Pmag with a top folding stock. Just about every operator I have ever worked with shared my sentiment....Whats next, hanging MRE's and extra chonies off your weapon?!?! please. just my .02