This is some stuff I posted on another board. I am hoping to get a little more play on here. I realize that the various BUIS have been discussed at length on this board prior to this, but I often don't read stuff only to become interested in the subject months later.
One thing to keep in mind when chosing between fixed or folding BUIS is, what are you using for a primary sight ? For instance, an ACOG not only needs a folding sight, it also needs a very low profile folding sight.
This past weekend I took the Frontsight Practical Rifle, Two day skill builder. I have taken this class twice before: once with an Aimpoint ML2 and once with a TA31F ACOG. This time, I took the class using only my Troy duel aperature BUIS.
This was two days, somewhere around 700 rounds, 7-200 yards, with VERY tight time constraints. Times range from 1.5 second head shots at 15 yards out to 6.5 second COM shots at 200 yards.
Bottom line: I did horrible. By FAR the worst I have ever done in any class or competitive venue.
I used the large aperature all the time. This was the advice of the instructor. I did fire a couple groups with each aperature and it seemed like they both were not on the same plane. This could have just been how bad I was shooting, but at this point, I don't know. If they were both on the same plane, I think I would have done better with the smaller aperature, but I don't know since I didn't try it.
I think that one of my major problems was that I wasn't getting a consistant cheek weld. I blame this on my use of optics for years. With a dot optic, cheek weld doesn't matter. With iron sights it is critical. I think that if I took the same class again, starting tomorrow, I would do OK. But, this kind of shooting with iron sights takes some serious training: and I don't have it.
I do have a couple negative comments about the Troy sight. One thing about the Troy BUIS that I consider a huge disadvantage is that I was unable to adjust the windage on mine with a bullet (I knew this before the class). I used a pen both times I adjusted mine. This is unacceptable to me. The sights should adjust with whatever you have on your person when you are firing the rifle: not a special tool. This usually means a bullet. The second thing is that ONCE during this class I looked down at my weapon and found that the rear sight aperature had rotated to half way between the large and small aperature.
If you were in combat or whatever, this would be a bad situation: you would have no rear sight.
So, there is more to the discussion besides whether or not the BUIS locks when open or it locks when closed. We also need to know about the aperature. After this experience, I would have to say that I think having a single aperature would be better. First of all, it can't rotate like mine did. Second, why do we need two aperatures anyway ? I suppose if you bought a flat top and didn't have the money for an optic and were using this sight as your only sighting system, having two aperatures makes sense. But as a BUIS, I would think that having only the large aperature makes more sense. If you were going to use the sight a lot: more than just a back up, I can see where having two, same plane aperatures would be a plus. But, not if it is possible for the aperatures to rotate so that you can't see through either one.
On the standard carry handle M16/AR15 we have two aperatures: one is for zero to 200 and the other is for use beyond 200: on the A2 the small aperature is used with the range knob. So, if we only had the large aperature designed for use at 0-200 yards, I think we would be fine. Simple is better.
The guy shooting next to me had a GG&G MAD BUIS on his gun. I liked the look of it. I think I might give it a try. It locks in the up and down positions as I understand it. It also has two aperatures, BUT the aperatures arn't on an "L" shaped piece of metal that flips one way or the other. The MAD aperatures are selected by rotating a "wheel" type thing. So, can this wheel get rotated so that it is inbetween aperatures ? Another plus with this MAD sight is that the two aperatures are on the same plane. So instead of one being the short range sight and the other being the long range sight: we can use either, at any range depending on lighting and on the need for speed. If we were shooting on a range at paper targets, we could use the small aperature for greater accuracy. If we had a 300 yard shot at an unsuspecting, stationary enemy with lots of time and a solid rest, we could dial up the small aperature for a precision shot. During a class such as the one I took this weekend, I could have tried the smaller aperature and if it didn't work out, I could have switched to the big one while maintaining my zero.
There is a sticky at the top of the first page concerning BUIS, but it just lists the various sights and their features. It don't really have much comment on the various sights.