User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 10/14/2003 8:27:42 PM EDT
Here is a new creation by the RB Precision team here are the specs:
-Custom 1:9 twist full fluted barrel under guards and on barrel -Yankee Hill free float Quad rail handguard -9 Ergo covers (sides and bottom) and 3 DPMS flush mount (top) -RRA approved tactical muzzle brake with HK like wire cutters and noggin bashing grooves. Pinned and welded per ATF rules... -Rock River A4 upper and carrier group I am seriously considering mass producing this and would like your opinions.. Price shipped $575.00 Thank you Robert and Krista www.rbprecision.com    |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/14/2003 8:30:46 PM EDT
[#1]
Look nice to me, maybe in a 1:8 though?...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/14/2003 8:53:01 PM EDT
[#2]
Thanks AB82, I can do 1:8 in non fluted now, Will see what I can do "flute" wise soon. A 1:7 chrome line is on the horizon.
Robert |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/14/2003 9:03:03 PM EDT
[#3]
I just built one just like it, I would have rather bought it already put together. I did mine with a fake brake to cut down on noise and such, but I really like your project, would it be chrome lined
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/14/2003 9:10:59 PM EDT
[#4]
would that that $575 with bolt or no?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/14/2003 9:19:48 PM EDT
[#5]
Quoted: would that that $575 with bolt or no? That is with bolt carrier and charging handle. Robert |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/14/2003 9:29:37 PM EDT
[#6]
How loud is that brake? you got my interest sofar.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/14/2003 9:37:51 PM EDT
[#7]
Quoted: How loud is that brake? you got my interest sofar. It is a excellent muzzle rise compensator, I am not going to lie and tell you it is music to the ears, it is nowhere near the Armalite three port of old or the Y comp, I would say in the lines of the Wilson three port mil style. It has 6 30-40 degree forward porting holes and two angled main ports Robert |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/14/2003 11:04:03 PM EDT
[#8]
Would a standard front sight be available as an option? I can't stand folding fronts.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/15/2003 12:29:50 AM EDT
[#9]
Quoted: Quoted: would that that $575 with bolt or no? That is with bolt carrier and charging handle. Robert Heck, I'd be in for one. IF they are 5.56 chambered w/chrome lined barrels. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/15/2003 1:49:22 PM EDT
[#10]
Quoted: Would a standard front sight be available as an option? I can't stand folding fronts. Yes I will deduct 15 for use of a standard front sight I have the barrels in stock with front sight ready to build, I will also build them on my new RRA engraved uppers, can use a UTE also Robert [url]www.rbprecision.com[/url] |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/15/2003 1:53:38 PM EDT
[#11]
Robert,
I don't want to guess. What's the barrel length ?? |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/15/2003 2:01:33 PM EDT
[#12]
Looks good - I'd buy it at that price.
(Of course, I'd buy it quicker if it cost less... [:D] - JK, the price seems very fair.) |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/15/2003 2:24:49 PM EDT
[#13]
Sounds like a deal to me.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/15/2003 2:27:14 PM EDT
[#14]
tagged, very interesting
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/15/2003 3:39:20 PM EDT
[#15]
Another vote for a faster twist; 1/8 or better.
Otherwise it looks great. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/15/2003 7:04:24 PM EDT
[#16]
Quoted: Robert, I don't want to guess. What's the barrel length ?? 16", Plus the additional length of the perm attached brake, I also have these in preban and preban with no lug (for those who want to put on a different brake) Robert |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/15/2003 8:00:05 PM EDT
[#17]
Quoted: Heck, I'd be in for one. IF they are 5.56 chambered w/chrome lined barrels. I'd buy one too. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/15/2003 10:31:26 PM EDT
[#18]
looks good...
i'd buy one with the regular front sight tower as well... can u post a pic of the upper on a.... lower [:D] one more thing... the color of the upper looks SUPER black, that is good... however the color of the handguards appears to be a lighter shade in the pics... is it just the pics? maybe my monitor... |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/15/2003 11:32:25 PM EDT
[#19]
Quoted: Another vote for a faster twist; 1/8 or better. Otherwise it looks great. ditto |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/15/2003 11:41:49 PM EDT
[#20]
I'd like to see one in 1/7 since most of my handloads tend to use heavier bullets. Looks great though [:)]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/16/2003 5:50:20 AM EDT
[#21]
hey id like to know if this could be done in a 20" upper
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/16/2003 6:44:03 AM EDT
[#22]
I'd Buy one!!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/16/2003 7:09:29 AM EDT
[#23]
Can you tell me how much it weighs?
Tnx |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/16/2003 7:19:01 AM EDT
[#24]
Looks like a grat upper. I would consider it for my next purchase.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/17/2003 7:16:32 PM EDT
[#25]
Quoted: looks good... i'd buy one with the regular front sight tower as well... can u post a pic of the upper on a.... lower [:D] one more thing... the color of the upper looks SUPER black, that is good... however the color of the handguards appears to be a lighter shade in the pics... is it just the pics? maybe my monitor... TPS there is a variation between the upper and the tube, we just met with YHM and are going to be offering some trick products on our customs, they have some serious, serious cool stuff in hiding. AR15.com will be the first to see them. Robert |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/17/2003 7:31:54 PM EDT
[#26]
Very nice, I'd buy one for sure.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/17/2003 7:33:06 PM EDT
[#27]
I'd buy one in a faster twist 20" chrome-lined!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/17/2003 10:54:56 PM EDT
[#28]
Looks like a nice set-up!
I might suggest a standard front sight post; The upper looks like a CQB accessory and a front sight post is alway a nice option for co-witnessing (with a 1x optic) or for using the front post alone as a "quick" aiming system for fast target aquisition at close range. (a prior service excercise). It also save money for the end user in that they would not have to lay out an additional $75-$100 for a front post to mount on the 'pic' rail. If a long range optic is used it will see "past" the standard front sight post anyways. -just a thought but it does look like a high quality and good looking upper... i would be proud to show it off. As a side note: I must admit that I have a CQB type Carbine with a fluted H-bar (among others), but I have often wondered if I should have built it with an M4 barrel? I don't think there is a right or wrong answer but, when I compare it some of my M4's they weigh less and are easier to manuver (a plus for a carbine). They are all semi-auto so I have not seen problems with an overheated "barrel whip"? .... But fluted does look way COOL! What is your preference? |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/19/2003 9:46:24 AM EDT
[#29]
Tagged , veryy interesting
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
