O_DubhGhaill,
Thanks, I could give many more examples and some of the axioms I've come up with over the years, but then I'd just get pissed off all over again. You have obviously experienced some of these same problems.
TXN,
While I have not personally seen a Miltech ad using the 507 ambush, I have seen MUCH official and personnal email traffic at work relating to the incident infering that Miltech would have been a better choice. Obviously, someone is trying to pull some strings and stir the pot on this one.
Some of the traffic I've read makes the accusation that Miltech has been shut out from GSA, DLA, etc. contracts unfairly, and go on to state that the troops are begging for their product.
Others come from those in procurement, R&D, or who otherwise have some influence that have somehow jumped on the pro Miltech/anti CLP bandwagon. Most of these, fall into two categories, A) Those who either believe the press, or who have otherwise bought(been bought)it. or B) Those old die-hards who refuse to believe that CLP is better than the old RBC and LSA that they use to clean their M14 with, but they somehow like Miltech, funny.
Not that I don't like either RBC or LSA, they are each fine products in there perspective areas I.E. RBC to clean with and LSA to lube with afterwards. I myself still use them on occasion. But, they have to be used as a pair to be effective. Logistically speaking, you have to lug around both of them and the use of one without the other leads to failures. And Miltech, well, test results have shown it to be second rate.
Dollar for dollar, ounce for ounce, CLP/BreakFree is still the best multi-purpose cleaner and lubricant our troops could use. We just need re-enforce it's PROPER use, and the importance of weapons maintenance in general to the troops.
Damn, now I'm pissed again.
Wpns Man