Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Posted: 11/22/2002 5:26:29 PM EDT
I was looking between the bushmaster A2 and the A3. What is the difference between the 2? Just the upper assembly?
Which is better in your opinion?

I was leaning towards the A3 in 20 inch.....
Would like to mount a Bushnell 4-16X50 scope on it....
Is this possible on the A3?
Link Posted: 11/22/2002 6:18:25 PM EDT
Hello Timmy, The major difference between the A2 and the A3 is it's removable carry handle, and rear sight setting with 6/3, and not 8/3. The A3 has a rail top, and you can attach many scope, red dot, or other optics at your desired.
Link Posted: 11/22/2002 7:33:00 PM EDT
Timmy~ I got the Bushy A3, and would reccommend it. Especially if you are going to opt for optics. You can still put optics on your A2, but it'll be a little more uncomfortable, and a little more of a hassle. I don't find that I use the carry handle much, anyway. That's what a sling is for. Best bet would be to buy one of each!
Link Posted: 11/22/2002 7:52:57 PM EDT
I also would opt for the a3, a few extra bucks, but versatility.
Link Posted: 11/23/2002 8:43:13 PM EDT
Chiming in with "Get the A3". It's like buying a convertable car... you get the top too, but you can take it off as desired.
Top Top