Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Posted: 2/16/2002 8:57:09 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 2/16/2002 9:14:23 AM EDT by sharky30]
know how the anti-gunners keep talking about an amendment to get rid of the 2nd Amendment? Here's my version "A well armed militia consisting of all citizens, being necessary for the security of a free and peaceful state, the right of all citizens to keep and bear arms shall not in any way be infringed" edited due to suggestions from other posts, just like a real Consitutional Convention [:)]
Link Posted: 2/16/2002 8:59:50 AM EDT
It's "bear" arms.
Link Posted: 2/16/2002 9:01:28 AM EDT
this admendment is better, "all citizens can have guns and all anti-gunners are now considered terrorists. subsection c of the admentment abolishes them to afganistan!"
Link Posted: 2/16/2002 9:03:48 AM EDT
Originally Posted By sharky30: know how the anti-gunners keep talking about an amendment to get rid of the 2nd Amendment? Here's my version "A well armed militia consisting of all able bodied citizens, being necessary for the security of a free and peaceful state, the right of all citizens to keep and bare arms shall not in any way be infringed"
View Quote
I would take out the part about able bodied, because those assholes would find some way to nit pick that such as too old, too young, mental health, amputees, etc.
Link Posted: 2/16/2002 9:12:48 AM EDT
thanks I knew I should have checked my pocket Constitution guide before posting
Originally Posted By KBaker: It's "bear" arms.
View Quote
Link Posted: 2/16/2002 9:25:32 AM EDT
It is the duty of all persons of this nation to contribute to national and state level security at all times and in all places. The duty to contribute to national and state level security may be waived by applying for a permit to not carry firearms. The price of this permit shall not excide the average weekly pay of the city or town in which the person resides. Permits are valid for a period of two years.
Link Posted: 2/16/2002 9:55:35 AM EDT
A variation of SDAVID's idea: It is the duty of all citizens to protect their country and their families. Each citizen is require to have in their possession, a minimum of one pistol, one shotgun and one military assault weapon capable of full automatic fire. Failure to have the above will result in the forfeiter of all rights and privileges.
Link Posted: 2/16/2002 10:22:54 AM EDT
2nd Amendment: Benjamin0001 Style 27 Amendment: 2nd Amendment: Stays the same but I kind like OWN A GUN, USE A GUN 27 Amendment: Would Read: Only Democrats are subject to laws passed by Democrats and Only Republicans are subject to laws passed by Republicans.
Link Posted: 2/16/2002 12:03:03 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 2/16/2002 12:06:24 PM EDT by deadman]
27 Amendment: Would Read: Only Democrats are subject to laws passed by Democrats and Only Republicans are subject to laws passed by Republicans.
View Quote
Can't say that I think that's a good idea. How about we only use and follow the best laws that each side comes up with, get the best of both worlds? Mix and match the best features of the Republicans(guns) and the Democrats(the environment). Throw it all into a blender, and enjoy a nice, tasty milkshake of a perfected America. Guns 'n' trees. Mmmm, mmmmm good.
Link Posted: 2/16/2002 12:24:37 PM EDT
Link Posted: 2/16/2002 5:38:15 PM EDT
Since every so often governments become overbearing and need to be overthrown, the right of the people to own and carry firearms shall not be infringed by any person or governmental entity.
Link Posted: 2/16/2002 8:09:27 PM EDT
Link Posted: 2/16/2002 8:41:54 PM EDT
If you're honest and literate, then the existing 2nd amendment is very adequate. If you're not BOTH honest and literate, it doesn't really matter anyway, and that's how the antigunners and many judges are now. But if it were to be re-written with extreme clarity, I'd do it like this: "The rights of the individual people to keep any type of arms and to bear any type of arms shall never be infringed by any person, government, or agency, whether local, state, or federal. Any such infringement shall be a capital offense, punishable by mandatory death sentence." Could I be any clearer? [;D] This could be interpreted to mean that anti-gunners could be put to death if they tried to interfere with your having a gun. I like it! CJ
Link Posted: 2/16/2002 10:21:03 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 2/16/2002 10:22:24 PM EDT by rule303]
God forbid it was ever changed for the worst, then it would be time to take out every left wing liberal bastard that supported the change. Thats it,,
Top Top