User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 2/9/2002 4:52:09 PM EDT
[#1]
I think It's pretty much a fact that it did indeed happen. It was reported by the NY Times, the Dudge Report, and most other news sources.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/9/2002 10:23:49 PM EDT
[#2]
Quoted: Did the White House really end up getting vandalized by disgruntled Klinton commie employees, and did stuff from Air Force One and the White House really end up being sold on EBAY? Having a little discussion with my significant "other" about these events. She claims they did not ever happen, and were a Republican smear capaign to discredit the Commiecrats. I need links with facts, not fiction. Please help the conservative cause !!!!! Dude, you're the one who married a liberal. The only thing I can do is give you a bullet to put you out of your misery. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/9/2002 10:25:33 PM EDT
[#3]
Redmanfms - that's harsh
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/9/2002 10:41:40 PM EDT
[#4]
Clinton did some heinous things. Partial birth abortion? Scissors to the base of the skull of a child? Its legal? Occurs in the mothers passage? The world is horrified!
The missing "W" keys is not worth mention. In Roman history you can find long successions of Emporers that were stabbed in the guts by the successor. The media claims now that this was a Bush succession ploy. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/9/2002 10:46:53 PM EDT
[#5]
Second wind. Clinton ran a "White House" of creativity and personal indulgence. The American public was apethetic. Now we have Bush.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/9/2002 11:17:07 PM EDT
[#6]
Here is the article from Drudge.
[url=]http://www.drudgereport.com/wh93a.htm[/url] Here is another article from Salon (liberal leaning) saying that it didn't happen. [url=]http://www.salon.com/politics/feature/2001/05/23/vandals/index.html[/url] It seems that it did happen and Bush covered it up or the Bush team made it up to make Clinton look bad. Both seem plausable to me, so I don't know. The GSA looked at the offices and said that they weren't that bad. [url=]http://www.kcstar.com/item/pages/home.pat,local/3accae7d.517,.html[/url] |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2002 12:16:13 AM EDT
[#7]
The story was out before the Bush Team's feet had hit the ground. Its all dirty shit in all politics. Having lived in Russia I have a slightly warped perspective. Its Red politics, its Brown politics, its White politics. The saying in Russia is "Yes, I am, are you one too, Comrade?"
In the interest of continued bread and water I have converted,under duress,to the Republican Firefighters and Policeman's Party. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2002 2:27:24 AM EDT
[#8]
Soon, but not [u]too[/u] soon, we will see an article steadfastly denying that there was ever a Presidential 'seal' of semen on Monica's blue dress!
It was all a conscious move on the part of a noble former president to admit the existence of such a stain, simply to bring a quick end to a sad and painful episode of hysteria on the part of an overweight and emotionally fragile young woman! He falsely admitted his sin to spare a young woman, so much like his own daughter, of any further humiliation at the hands of a vast right-wing conspiracy! Film at 11:00! Eric The(WiseBeyondHisEars)Hun[>]:)] |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2002 8:07:07 AM EDT
[#9]
I'm pretty sure that Hillary admitted to these thefts.
Who cares? The Clintons and their employees are dirtbags anyway. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2002 11:24:24 AM EDT
[#10]
Quoted: Here is the article from Drudge. [url=]http://www.drudgereport.com/wh93a.htm[/url] Here is another article from Salon (liberal leaning) saying that it didn't happen. [url=]http://www.salon.com/politics/feature/2001/05/23/vandals/index.html[/url] It seems that it did happen and Bush covered it up or the Bush team made it up to make Clinton look bad. Both seem plausable to me, so I don't know. The GSA looked at the offices and said that they weren't that bad. [url=]http://www.kcstar.com/item/pages/home.pat,local/3accae7d.517,.html[/url] "The condition of the real property was consistent with what we would expect to encounter when tenants vacate office space after an extended occupancy," according to a GSA statement. Real property refers to the buildings themselves, not the contents. That is what the GSA report covers. A lot of people, myself included, got conned by this one. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
