You guys are making this far too difficult.
Here is how I would do it:
First, I would pinch myself
Second, I would wake up from this really bad dream
Lastly, I would be glad that it was only a really bad dream
Problem solved!

open borders will not work if they are not guarded. not closed borders either. a controlled intake is prefereble; just ask the non-mexicans who live in montana [:D]

if you get rid of the IRS, then the BATF would follow since they are a part of the treasury dept. they inforce laws that break tax violations. no US tax code 26. hehe

whats wrong with the Food and Drug adminstration? they just need to lighten up on new medicines.

explosive? given away to just anybody? 40mm grenades in the hand of citizens; even if they never have criminal intent is dangerous due to fire codes and insufficient storage area desighned to house explosive devices. if someones house or shed caught on fire. a firefighter would face a fatal fireworks. the possessor of such an explosive device would likely be held accountable.

Reduction of Armed Forces could prove disastrous. America should at least have the fighting capability to fight a war on two fronts and win. winning means being able to kick the enemies butts two times over with extra to spare.

it would not be necessary to bring home all overseas forces. to do so would make it difficult to deploy to a theatre in an effort to "head off" enemy forces.


pro-military/anti-interference lib


"the problem is trying to convince crazy people that im not crazy"

difficult? [:D][:D]haha!




"i've given up my search for truth and will settle for a good fantasy"

What about "armed neutrality"?  I don't think we should be going around meddling with other countries in a very broad attempt to possibly "head" off a potential attack years in the future.

On the other hand, I agree with the military actions in Afghanistan.

But I consider that to be a strict retaliation, and less of a "domino effect" type of strategic move.